1. The Future of High Energy Physics R. Aleksan CPPM/IN2P3 and DAPNIA/CEA (aleksan@hep.saclay.cea.fr)aleksan@hep.saclay.cea.fr EPS HEP2005 Lisbon, July 23, 2005  History and organization  Approved project  What is coming next  On the short term  On the medium/long term EU-supported Accelerator R&D activities

2. History and Organization “an improved educational programme in the field of accelerator physics and increased support for accelerator R&D activity in European universities, national facilities and CERN” 1) ECFA 2001 Report “The Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics in Europe” 2) Absence of HEP in the FP of the EU The ESGARD should develop a proposal to optimize and enhance the outcome of the Research and Technical Development in the field of accelerator physics in Europe byto optimize and enhance the outcome of the Research and Technical Development in the field of accelerator physics in Europe  promoting mutual coordination and facilitating the pooling of European resources  promoting a coherent and coordinated utilization and development of infrastructures  promoting inter-disciplinary collaboration including industry This proposal is aimed at preparing and conducting a coherent set of bids to apply for EU funding in the 6 th Framework Programme. http://esgard.lal.in2p3.fr

3. Accelerator R&D projects ESGARD Strategy:  Develop a general multipurpose program  From which specific projects would emerge 3 Networks4 Joint Research Activities First step http://care.lal.in2p3.fr

4. CARE Coordinated Accelerator Research in Europe http://care.lal.in2p3.fr …and many (580) associates CARE has demonstrated that the ESGARD objective (i.e. carrying Accelerator Research by integrating the European resources in a collaborative mode as we are used to do for detectors) is getting a reality return 22 institutes from 9 countries having signed the EU contract

5. A lot has already been done in one year… ELANBENEHHHSRFPHINHIPPINEDTotal Notes265620039 Pub1214 reports11111128 conf1818619254 …demonstrating that the work has indeed started vigorously 2004 CARE papers and a large number of talks at conferences Amongst which papers in NatureNature, NIM, Phys. Rev… return Summary of work in 2005 will be presented at CARE05 at CERN on September 23-25

6. ProjectTypeBeam Type Start date Duration Years Total Cost EU contribution CAREI3All1/1/04555 M € 15.2 M € EUROTE V DSe +,e - (LC)1/1/05329 M € 9 M € EURISOLDSIon, p  beam) 1/1/05433 M € (3.3 M €) 9.16 M € (1 M €) Total>117 M € 33.2 M € Summary of Accelerator R&D projects These projects are well structured, with clear objectives, deliverables and milestones. They represent a fantastic strength for the HEP European community in order to play a leadership role  In the improvement of present accelerators  In the development of new accelerators

7. Connection To CARE BDS: Beam Delivery System DR: Dumping Rings PPS: Polarized Positron Source DIAG: Diagnostics ILPS: Integrated Luminosity Performance Studies METSTB: Metrology and Stabilization GANMVL: GAN Multipurpose Virtual Laboratory 23 participants from 6 countries A 3-year program, with: Coordinating lab: DESY Admin. Coord.: E. Elsen Scientific co-chairs of SC G. Guignard & N. Walker return

8. EURISOL with  beams (reminder) 4-year program. Coordinating lab: LNL Scientific & Admin. Coord.: G. Fortuna 21 participants from 15 countries Total Expected Budget (k€) Requested EU Funding (k€) Total33 2939 162  beams 3 2931 010 Leader: M. Lindroos (CERN) Connection To CARE return

9. ProjectTypeTopicsStart date Duration Years Total Cost EU contribution EUDETI3Detectors for e +,e - (LC) 1/1/06 ? 3?? M € 7 M € ILIASI3Astroparticle general 1/4/04410 M € 7.5 M € KM3netDSAstroparticle  telescope 1/1/06 ? 424.2 M € 9 M € Other HEP non-accelerator R&D projects

10. ProjectTopicsDuration Years Total CostEU contribution EUROLEAPPlasma acceleration34.1 M € 2 M € Next Steps Short term applications (FP6) NEST calls (New Emerging Science and Technology) The goal is to produce electron beams in the GeV energy range, with an energy spread less than 1%, in a reproducible way over a distance less than 10 cm. 3 projects submitted, one has been selected for a second stage evaluation

11. Next Steps Long term (FP7) Two proposed main lines of action  Continuation and improvement of the current (mainly “bottom-up”) approach for optimizing the access to and the utilization and performance of existing infrastructures  Implementation of a «strategic» approach for developing future infrastructures of pan-European interest (incl. major upgrades) ESFRI will develop a roadmap for construction of new RIs for the next 10-20 years 3 Steering Groups are being set up : Physical Sciences and Engineering Biological and Medical Sciences Social Sciences and Humanities Establish a list of infrastructure to be supported by the EC (list of opportunities)

12. Conclusions A strategy for developing accelerator R&D has been set up Good relation with the EC have been established This past 2 years were very busy and successful with A multipurpose research program exists, It is well established and visible in the HEP and EU landscape and Specific programs for Design Studies approved  Getting ready for the short term developments  Preparing the longer term In the evaluation process  Developing novel acceleration technology For the longer term, the preparation to FP7 and to its calls is on our agenda