1. One Platform, Two Stories

3. Willamette University Oregon State University

4. Academic CommonsScholarsArchive@OSU

5. Broadly defined, an Institutional Repository is a service that … Collects digital content produced by an institution Provides a variety of access levels to content Preserves content over time Supports stable, reliable Web access over time Enables discovery of content by various audiences Integrates with other services (external repositories, authoring tools, web sites)

6. Let’s see… Should we go with XMLUI or JSPUI?

8. Undergraduate theses (currently 1500 and growing) Moveable Type (1993-2003)

9. More complex to install and support than some options; easier than others Easier: CONTENTdm More complicated: Fedora Out-of –the-box interface that is modestly customizable and XML user interface that is highly customizable given the right skill set (css, xslt) Support for a growing number of protocols (OAI-PMH, SWORD, Dublin Core, METS, MODS, SRW/U)

10. Handle service provides stable URLs that do not change if the resource is renamed or relocated Monitoring of file integrity, item provenance, repository history File format registry Robust authorization system and support for external authentication protocols Regular software releases (current release 1.5.1, a 2.0 development branch is underway)

11. Front-end Web Server (2) Application Server (2) Database Server (1) OSU Libraries Customizations

12. Linking from Catalog to ScholarsArchive

13. Oregon Explorer Template

14. Willamette University Customizations Front-end Web Server (1) Application Server (1) Database Server (1)

15. XMLUI Design LDAP Authorization by employee_type

16. 1.Submission process that can be customized and used by departments outside the library 2.Handle server provides stable URL 3.Fine-grained authorization for item access and collection maintenance roles 4.Standards-based development and an active international developer community 5.DSpace Foundation facilitates forward-thinking, collaborative development work 6.SWORD supports integration with other systems (e.g.: Open Journal Systems e-journal publishing software) 7.Can be used to archive a wide variety of digital object types 8.User interface can be used out-of-the-box or customized and shared (e.g.: improved support for image browsing) 9.Application code can be modified and shared 10.Commercial support is available if you need it

17. ScholarsArchive Community Page COAS Home Page

18. Verify Screen Ability to Restrict Access Progress Buttons Ability to Save Submission

19. 1.Many customizations are not possible without the appropriate technical skills 2.Relatively complex to install and administer 3.Native support for image browsing is poor, but the XMLUI can help with this 4.DSpace 2.0 will introduce more modularity, but modifying the current code base can add significant complexity to upgrades 5.The authorization system is powerful but relatively difficult to use in its current incarnation 6.Contracting for hosted DSpace from a vendor solves support issues but may limit how DSpace is used at your institution 7.Not easy to integrate with external tools and Web sites

20. No Technical Support Disconnect Between Developers and Users Developers Answer to Employers/Institutions Customizations Can Wreak Havoc

21. DSpace Statistics

22. What Excites Us About the Future?

23. Michael Spalti, Head of Library Systems Division Willamette University mspalti@willamette.edu Sue Kunda, Digital Production Librarian Oregon State University sue.kunda@oregonstate.edu