1. IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Akira OMOTO Director, Division of Nuclear Power a.omoto@iaea.org Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development how to harmonize efforts to face the challenges?

2. IAEA WS, 2009 December2 Background: International support to new countries  Various international initiative and suppliers are willing to support GNEP, EC, G8, WANO, WNA, Bilateral arrangement Players in the market (Suppliers, Consultants)  Agency’s support has limitation due to available resources details in implementation by practitioners technology specific support by Suppliers  Coordination may be necessary, with the following objectives To make sure recipients needs are addressed appropriately Effective use of international resources Avoid overlap & speak in one voice International confidence building on the country’s NP programme

3. IAEA WS, 2009 December3 Key to successful coordinated support : information  Information from Supplier/Recipient on what is going on  Results from infrastructure assessment indicating infrastructure status and distance to the goal Agency’s independent Assessment (INIR) Recognized status & distance to milestone Self-assessment a)Country: Effective use of integrated assistance b) IAEA: Reflect on TCP c) International concerted efforts to to address the recognized gaps d) Confidence building by meeting suppliers/bankers expectation (“nuclear-worthiness”) Collected information From Supplier/Recipient

4. IAEA WS, 2009 December4 Various approach conceivable  Issue specific global WG  Global forum for sharing experiences & LL from infrastructure building and infrastructure assessment  A group approach centered around a specific recipient country Sharing information of a) infrastructure assessment & b) assistance by International Non-Gov Organs 1,2 and bilateral agreement with provider countries A, B, C Country A Country X Country B Country CIAEA INO 1 INO 2

5. IAEA WS, 2009 December5 Need further discussion 1.If coordination or harmonized action is necessary or not ? 2. If it is needed, What is the objective of harmonization / coordination? What is the role of the Agency and added value by Agency’s involvement? Is there willingness to share information from both sides ? How the collected information can be used? Extent of sharing of information? Modality of coordination

6. IAEA WS, 2009 December6 BTW, something I forgot to say in my presentation on the first day For long-term planning of future energy system including nuclear power, consider the use of IAEA tools: a) For consideration of SD; EISD (Energy Indicator for Sustainable Development ) b) For energy planning; Energy Planning Tools CA (Comparative Assessment) c) To achieve higher goals in safety, security, economics, waste, environment, proliferation-resistance and infrastructure for nuclear power and fuel cycle: INPRO assessment methodology

7. IAEA WS, 2009 December7  Many attributes of nuclear energy have potential to contribute to improve indicators of sustainable development  Potential to improve EISD of a nation by having NE in the energy portfolio  29 EISD indicators : Society (4) Economy (15) Environment (10)  usable to Analyze past trends and current situation Measure distance to target Formulate strategy Energy Indicator for Sustainable Development (EISD)

8. IAEA WS, 2009 December8 IAEA tools for Energy Modeling and Comparative Assessment Model for the Analysis of Energy Demand MAED WASP MESSAGE FINPLAN SIMPACTS ENPEP Energy and Power Evaluation Programme Wien Automatic System Planning Package Model for Energy Supply System Alternatives and their General Environmental impacts Financial Analysis of Electric Sector Expansion Plans Simplified Approach for Estimating Impacts of Electricity Generation

9. IAEA WS, 2009 December9 Networking: INPRO -- Forum of technology holders and users jointly to consider innovation

10. IAEA WS, 2009 December10 Basic Principal User Requirement Structure of INPRO methodology Criterion (Indicator +Accept. Limit)

11. IAEA WS, 2009 December11 Issues in harmonization/coordination What is the objective? Benefit for the recipients Effective use of resources, avoid overlap, speak in one voice International/regional confidence building on the country’s NP programme What is the potential added value by Agency’s coordination? Impartial coordination Located at the crossroad of information on new countries development through TCP and others. A unique authority in verification and establishing standards for safety and security. Through Agency’s involvement in the coordination, obligations and pre- requisites are recognized among all the providers of support, which will benefit ensuring safe and secure and nuclear power programme with due regards to proliferation-resistance in new countries.

12. IAEA WS, 2009 December12 …Thank you for your attention