Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Preparticipation Physical Examination Deb Jacobson, M.D.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Preparticipation Physical Examination Deb Jacobson, M.D."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Preparticipation Physical Examination Deb Jacobson, M.D.

3 Goals and objectives n Eval general health status n Determine fitness for competition n Foster injury prevention n Discover diseases/injuries n Counsel on health-related issues

4 Goals and objectives n Detect conditions that may be life- threatening or disabling n Determine sports specific skill level and conditioning n Meet legal and insurance requirements

5 PPE is NOT n Barrier to athlete participation n Purpose not to exclude but promote safety n Only 0.3-1.3% denied clearance n Only 3.2-13.5% require further evaluation n Not intended to substitute for regular health maintenance

6 Problems with PPE n Previously consisted of three H’s n Now has multiple objectives n No clear purpose n No standardization

7 Problems with PPE n Is PPE a good screening tool? n NO! Rarity of serious medical conditions found in millions of athletes screened n Does serve a purpose n Best guideline is PPE monograph published by Physician and Sportmed

8 Timing of PPE n Ideally should be 6-8 wks prior to preseason practice n Allows sufficient time to rehab injuries n Allows time for evaluation or correction of identified medical problems

9 Frequency of PPE n Most advocate full examination annually n Some say prior to every sports season n Some say prior to entering new school level with interim evaluation

10 Structure of PPE n Office-based vs... station-based n Advantages and disadvantages of each

11 History n Most important element of PPE n 75% of conditions evident from history n Only 39% of history given by athlete agreed with that of parent n Get parents involved!!!

12 History n Start w/ general medical questions n Hospitalizations and surgeries n Medications (including supplements, OTC, etc) n CV- 95% of sudden death in athletes under age 30 due to structural cardiac problems –history should include h/o syncope, chest pain, palpitations, dizziness w/exercise

13 History n Respiratory- wheeze, RAD, EIA, cystic fibrosis n Infectious disease- respiratory, skin, GI n Organs- paired, enlarged n Metabolic- DM, eating disorders, female triad, obesity, heat illness, steroid use, sickle cell n Neurologic- repeated concussions, seizure d/o, CP n Musculoskeletal- prior trauma or injury, rehab n Psych/soc- stress, depression, anxiety, pressure n Social- tobacco, alcohol, drugs, STD prevention

14 Exam n Vital signs, height and weight n Eyes- Visual acuity, pupils (document physiologic anisocoria) n ENT- general well-being n CV- BP, radial/femoral pulses, auscultation in supine and standing position for rate, rhythm, and murmurs. Further eval w/ maneuvers as needed. –AHA guidelines

15 Exam n Be aware of ranges of normal w/ the “athlete’s heart” –bradycardia –functional murmur –physiologic gallop –ECG abnormalities

16 Exam n Lungs- breath sounds, wheezing, ask about tobacco n Abdomen- masses, HSM n Genitalia –males- testicular presence/masses, hernia exam ONLY if indicated –females- not part of PPE n Skin- rashes, lesions, infections

17 Exam n Musculoskeletal- 90 second screening exam n see handout –Caveats n top to bottom n watch ROM n look for symmetry n focused joint exam if abnormality discovered or history suggests n can tailor exam for sports specific

18 Determining clearance n You picked up something abnormal on history or physical –What now? n Two good resources –“Contraindications to Athletic Participation”. Physician and Sportsmedicine, vol 24, no. 8 & 9 –26th Bethesda Conference: Recommendations for Determining Eligibility for Competition in Athletes with CV Abnormalities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 26(10), Supp, Oct ‘94

19 Medicolegal considerations n Failure to diagnose/improper clearance –Reggie Lewis, Hank Gathers –each state has own regulations, no universally accepted standard n Right to participate –Team M.D. often lose, courts rule with athlete under the Americans with Disabilities Act n Knapp v. Northwestern n Pahulu v. University of Kansas

20 Medicolegal considerations n Sexual harassment claims –have chaperone, document n Good Samaritan Status –does not apply in all states –must not accept any form of payment to be protected

21 Conclusion n Done correctly PPE can enhance safety of sports participation n Also provides teachable moment n Need standardization n Get involved- IT’S FUN

22 References n Glover, D.W. et al. The Preparticipation Physical Examination: Steps Toward Consensus and Uniformity. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 27(8). n Herbert, D.L. Practice Guidelines Take Center Court. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 24(3). n Mitchell, J.H. et al, editor, ACSM, ACC 26th Bethesda Conference: Recommendations for Determining Eligibility for Competition in Athletes with Cardiovascular Abnormalities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 26(10). n Moeller, J.L. Contraindications to Athletic Participation: Respiratory and Central Nervous System Conditions. Physician and Sportsmedicine, 24(8): 47-58.

23 References n Moeller, J.L. Contraindications to Athletic Participation: Spinal, Systemic, Dermatologic, Paired Organ and Other Issues. Physician and Sportsmedicine, 24(9): 57-75. n Preparticipation Physical Evaluation Monograph, second edition. Joint publication of AAFP,AAP, AMSSM, AOSSM, AOASM. Physician and Sportsmedicine, publisher, 1996.


Download ppt "Preparticipation Physical Examination Deb Jacobson, M.D."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google