1. Numbers we have to report AND Goals we have to set 14a. Successful student course completion rate for the fall 2012 semester 14b. Institution-set standard for student course completion rate 15a. Percent of students retained from fall 2011 to fall 2012 semesters 15b. Institution-set standard for student retention percentage 16a. Number of students who received a degree in the 2011-12 academic year 16b. Institution-set standard for student degree completion number 18a. Number of students who completed certificate requirements and received a certificate in the 2011-12 academic year 18b. Institution-set standard for student certificate completion number

2. Proposed PRBC Agenda for the Spring March 6 th : Program Review Process, Accreditation goal setting, Title V presentation March 13th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups March 20th: Strategic Plan Initiative Reports, feedback on program review process/insights to date; shared governance effectiveness process proposal March 27 th : Initiative workgroups, program review reading groups April 10th: Shared governance structure, document, Initiative workgroup reports April 17th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups April 24th: Program review conclusions session, preparation for 4/30 Flex Day May 1st: Flex feedback, connecting program review to resource allocation May 8th: Environmental scan, Classified prioritization May 15th: Assessing our effectiveness, planning for the future, summer retreat Dates in bold are PRBC Meeting dates.

3. Good of the Order Jennifer: anything to say about April Flex Day Opportunity for BSILI, conference opportunity and time to plan and develop projects with support. We have been asked to “opt-in” early, and we’d like to send teams—initiative groups (e.g., pathways, college up, diversity, etc) are possibles. This is a really great opportunity: interest? SLOAC: noticed on the Flex day planning, a note about impact of “outside changes.” Something we need to know?

4. PRBC Process for Program Review Deans review program reviews and summarize them. AND shared governance committees review pertinent sections and dean's summary. Deans and committees generate response. GOAL: INTEGRATION AND FEEDBACK Deans' summary and committee responses will use templates (accreditation style, noting excellence, good work, weaknesses, recommendations, and required action) AS WELL AS prioritize:1) short term and doable, 2) possible action but with challenges, 3) documented need, but no resources. GOAL: CONSISTENCY and PRIORITIZATION. Aggregate deans' summaries and committee responses. PRBC reviews draft, available to whole campus. DATE NEEDED: GOAL: TRANSPARENCY In progress: online library of submissions, templates, and cues. Paper copy provided to each shared governance committee. Deans and committees will work through April 24, with Dean's summaries due to committees as soon as possible. Final responses from committees will be due XXXXX. GOAL: PAPER TRAIL, INTEGRATION, FEEDBACK, TRANSPARENCY Discussion of draft at April XXXX meetings includes prioritization and recommendations, finalized on April 24 and made available. GOAL: COMPLETE IN TIMELY WAY, TRANSPARENCY Background: a READING GROUP will commit to dividing up and reading ALL program review documents. GOAL: ENSURE INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE (Accreditation requirement)