1. Topics for today Events of the day/week IGOs and theories of IR UN and EU Study Questions, Nau p. 392  Do you know the answers? Why is the United Nations relatively less successful than the European Union? 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

2. States – and what else? International Governmental Organizations (IGOs)  United Nations, European Union, UNESCO, NATO, FAO, WHO, WMO…. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)  Economic power: Multinational Corporations (MNCs)  Moral power: Transnational Advocacy Networks  Illicit power: Drug Cartels and Terrorists 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

3. IGOs and NGOs IGO: created and joined by governments, which give them authority to make collective decisions to manage particular global problems. NGO: not created by states or other intergovernmental organizations Examples: Oxfam, International Red Cross, Amnesty International, Greenpeace, etc. 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

4. IGOs in international relations Neorealism: Instruments of great powers Neoliberal institutionalism: Arenas facilitating cooperation Idealism/Constructivism: Actors shaping state interests and behavior 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

5. Liberalism: IGO as arenas IGOs primarily lower transaction and information costs for states:  Provide a forum for discussion  Supply information about problems/other actors  Help with monitoring/enforcement  Provide third-party mediation 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

6. Idealism: IGO as actors Shape the social environment of states:  Frame and constitute the state system  Favor cooperative solutions to global problems (forum effects)  Teach states about their interests  De-legitimize certain interests and behavior (use of violence, nuclear and biological weapons, etc.).  Empower non-state activism and (universal) norms 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

7. Classifying IGOs Who is admitted as a member? What are the responsibilities of an IGO? What are the decision-making procedures?  Majority voting, weighted voting, unanimity voting What are the competencies of administrative bodies (secretariat)? What mechanisms for dispute resolution exist? >>>> Comparing UN and EUUNEU 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

8. Classifying IGOs Mandate Membership Universal General UN Limited Specialized UNESCO, ILO, WTO, UNICEF, FAO, UNHCR, WHO OPEC EU NATO OAS G-77 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

9. Comparing the UN and the EU The United Nations  Headquarters: New York (Geneva, Vienna), Budget: $1.8 billion (2005; 4.5b for peacekeeping); ten states pay for 75% of the budget  Multi-purpose and global organization devoted to international peace and security/promotion of universal aims  Main bodies: Security Council and General Assembly The European Union  Headquarters: Brussels (Strasbourg, Luxembourg), Budget: $121 billion (2005)Budget  Mainly economic organization with regional membership  Main bodies: European Commission, Parliament, Council, Court of Justice, European Central Bank. 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

10. UN Budget for 2005 (in Million-$): top contributors United States*: 440 (24%) Japan: 346 (19%) Germany: 154 (8%) UK*: 109 (6%) France*: 107 (6%) Italy: 87 (5%) Canada: 50 (3%) Spain: 45 (2%) China*: 37 (2%) Mexico: 34 (2%) South Korea: 32 (1.9%) Netherlands: 30 (1.7%) Russia*: 29 (1.3%) Australia: 28 (1.2%) Brazil: 27 (1.2%) Switzerland: 21 (1%) 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

11. General Assembly and Security Council Security Council: 15 members; ten non- permanent, five permanent with veto power (China, US, Russia, France, and Great Britain). General Assembly: One state-one vote. Africa and Asia combine now for 56 per cent of the GA votes, rather than 24 per cent in 1945. See chart.chart 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

12. Comparing Institutions I European Commission: independent from member states, exclusive authority to initiate legislation, “guardian of the treaties,” about 25,000 civil servants for 25 member states UN Secretariat: responsible for day-today operations; services the principal organs of the UN; about 8,900 civil servants for 192 member states 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

13. Comparing Institutions II European Parliament: directly elected representatives from all member states; approves the budget (with the Council) UN General Assembly: one state – one vote; makes primarily non-binding decisions (resolutions; except: budget) 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

14. Comparing Institutions III European Court of Justice: power to interpret and enforce EU treaties; hears cases from individuals and corporations; effective in enforcing community law International Court of Justice: relies on prior acceptance by state parties; hears cases from states only; ineffective in enforcing international law 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

15. Regional IGOs Americas: Organization of American States Organization of American States (OAS) MERCOSUR Africa: African Union African Union (AU, since 2002); previously: Organization of African Unity (OAU) Asia: Association of South East Asian Nations Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Middle East: League of Arab States 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

16. Why is European integration a success? Why is European integration progressing while the UN struggles to fulfill its mandate?  Shock of World War II and the Holocaust.  United States support during in Cold War.  Economic integration as focal point. Economic growth of the 1950s/60s legitimized integration.  Cultural differences are less pronounced. Europe: A model for the rest of the world? Answer: Not likely. The United States and Germany played a unique role in the unification of Europe. 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz

17. Summary: Understanding IGO success and limits Lessons Learned  Unique conditions in Europe after World War II.  Start with a small number of countries and focus only on economic integration.  Avoid a mismatch of mandate and capabilities.  Expand mandate and membership slowly.  Pre-screen new members and create separate steps of integration; members must be democracies.  Deepen integration on the basis of consensus, even if it takes longer. 2/13/2008Hans Peter Schmitz