Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan University Of Engineering.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan University Of Engineering."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan fahad@uettaxila.edu.pk Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan fahad@uettaxila.edu.pk University Of Engineering & Technology Taxila,Pakistan

2 2 Today’s Class Chapter 13 Software Testing Strategies R.S.Pressman

3 3 Software Testing Testing is the process of exercising a program with the specific intent of finding errors prior to delivery to the end user.

4 4

5 5 What Testing Shows errors requirements conformance performance an indication of quality

6 6 Who Tests the Software? developer independent tester Understands the system but, will test "gently" and, is driven by "delivery" Must learn about the system, but, will attempt to break it and, is driven by quality

7 7 Testing Strategy unit test integrationtest validationtest systemtest

8 8 Testing Strategy We begin by ‘testing-in-the-small’ and move toward ‘testing-in-the-large’ We begin by ‘testing-in-the-small’ and move toward ‘testing-in-the-large’ For conventional software For conventional software The module (component) is our initial focus The module (component) is our initial focus Integration of modules follows Integration of modules follows For OO software For OO software our focus when “testing in the small” changes from an individual module (the conventional view) to an OO class that encompasses attributes and operations and implies communication and collaboration our focus when “testing in the small” changes from an individual module (the conventional view) to an OO class that encompasses attributes and operations and implies communication and collaboration

9 9 Strategic Issues State testing objectives explicitly. State testing objectives explicitly. Understand the users of the software and develop a profile for each user category. Understand the users of the software and develop a profile for each user category. Develop a testing plan that emphasizes “rapid cycle testing.” Develop a testing plan that emphasizes “rapid cycle testing.” Build “robust” software that is designed to test itself Build “robust” software that is designed to test itself Use effective formal technical reviews as a filter prior to testing Use effective formal technical reviews as a filter prior to testing Conduct formal technical reviews to assess the test strategy and test cases themselves. Conduct formal technical reviews to assess the test strategy and test cases themselves. Develop a continuous improvement approach for the testing process. Develop a continuous improvement approach for the testing process.

10 10 Unit Testing module to be tested test cases results softwareengineer

11 11 Unit Testing interface local data structures boundary conditions independent paths error handling paths module to be tested test cases

12 12 Unit Test Environment Module stub stub driver RESULTS interface local data structures boundary conditions independent paths error handling paths test cases

13 13 Integration Testing Strategies Options: the “big bang” approachthe “big bang” approach an incremental construction strategyan incremental construction strategy

14 14 Top Down Integration top module is tested with stubs stubs are replaced one at a time, "depth first" as new modules are integrated, some subset of tests is re-run A B C DE FG

15 15 Bottom-Up Integration drivers are replaced one at a time, "depth first" worker modules are grouped into builds and integrated A B C DE FG cluster

16 16 Sandwich Testing Top modules are tested with stubs Worker modules are grouped into builds and integrated A B C DE FG cluster

17 17 Object-Oriented Testing begins by evaluating the correctness and consistency of the OOA and OOD models begins by evaluating the correctness and consistency of the OOA and OOD models testing strategy changes testing strategy changes the concept of the ‘unit’ broadens due to encapsulation the concept of the ‘unit’ broadens due to encapsulation integration focuses on classes and their execution across a ‘thread’ or in the context of a usage scenario integration focuses on classes and their execution across a ‘thread’ or in the context of a usage scenario validation uses conventional black box methods validation uses conventional black box methods test case design draws on conventional methods, but also encompasses special features test case design draws on conventional methods, but also encompasses special features

18 18 Broadening the View of “Testing” It can be argued that the review of OO analysis and design models is especially useful because the same semantic constructs (e.g., classes, attributes, operations, messages) appear at the analysis, design, and code level. Therefore, a problem in the definition of class attributes that is uncovered during analysis will circumvent side effects that might occur if the problem were not discovered until design or code (or even the next iteration of analysis). It can be argued that the review of OO analysis and design models is especially useful because the same semantic constructs (e.g., classes, attributes, operations, messages) appear at the analysis, design, and code level. Therefore, a problem in the definition of class attributes that is uncovered during analysis will circumvent side effects that might occur if the problem were not discovered until design or code (or even the next iteration of analysis).

19 19 Testing the CRC Model Revisit the CRC model and the object-relationship model. Revisit the CRC model and the object-relationship model. Inspect the description of each CRC index card to determine if a delegated responsibility is part of the collaborator’s definition. Inspect the description of each CRC index card to determine if a delegated responsibility is part of the collaborator’s definition. Invert the connection to ensure that each collaborator that is asked for service is receiving requests from a reasonable source. Invert the connection to ensure that each collaborator that is asked for service is receiving requests from a reasonable source. Using the inverted connections examined in step 3, determine whether other classes might be required or whether responsibilities are properly grouped among the classes. Using the inverted connections examined in step 3, determine whether other classes might be required or whether responsibilities are properly grouped among the classes. Determine whether widely requested responsibilities might be combined into a single responsibility. Determine whether widely requested responsibilities might be combined into a single responsibility. Steps 1 to 5 are applied iteratively to each class and through each evolution of the OOA model. Steps 1 to 5 are applied iteratively to each class and through each evolution of the OOA model.

20 20 OOT Strategy class testing is the equivalent of unit testing class testing is the equivalent of unit testing operations within the class are tested operations within the class are tested the state behavior of the class is examined the state behavior of the class is examined integration applied three different strategies integration applied three different strategies thread-based testing—integrates the set of classes required to respond to one input or event thread-based testing—integrates the set of classes required to respond to one input or event use-based testing—integrates the set of classes required to respond to one use case use-based testing—integrates the set of classes required to respond to one use case cluster testing—integrates the set of classes required to demonstrate one collaboration cluster testing—integrates the set of classes required to demonstrate one collaboration

21 21 Smoke Testing A common approach for creating “daily builds” for product software A common approach for creating “daily builds” for product software Smoke testing steps: Smoke testing steps: Software components that have been translated into code are integrated into a “build.” Software components that have been translated into code are integrated into a “build.” A build includes all data files, libraries, reusable modules, and engineered components that are required to implement one or more product functions. A build includes all data files, libraries, reusable modules, and engineered components that are required to implement one or more product functions. A series of tests is designed to expose errors that will keep the build from properly performing its function. A series of tests is designed to expose errors that will keep the build from properly performing its function. The intent should be to uncover “show stopper” errors that have the highest likelihood of throwing the software project behind schedule. The intent should be to uncover “show stopper” errors that have the highest likelihood of throwing the software project behind schedule. The build is integrated with other builds and the entire product (in its current form) is smoke tested daily. The build is integrated with other builds and the entire product (in its current form) is smoke tested daily. The integration approach may be top down or bottom up. The integration approach may be top down or bottom up.

22 22 High Order Testing Validation testing Validation testing Focus is on software requirements Focus is on software requirements System testing System testing Focus is on system integration Focus is on system integration Alpha/Beta testing Alpha/Beta testing Focus is on customer usage Focus is on customer usage Recovery testing Recovery testing forces the software to fail in a variety of ways and verifies that recovery is properly performed forces the software to fail in a variety of ways and verifies that recovery is properly performed Security testing Security testing verifies that protection mechanisms built into a system will, in fact, protect it from improper penetration verifies that protection mechanisms built into a system will, in fact, protect it from improper penetration Stress testing Stress testing executes a system in a manner that demands resources in abnormal quantity, frequency, or volume executes a system in a manner that demands resources in abnormal quantity, frequency, or volume Performance Testing Performance Testing test the run-time performance of software within the context of an integrated system test the run-time performance of software within the context of an integrated system

23 23 Debugging: A Diagnostic Process

24 24 The Debugging Process test cases results Debugging suspectedcauses identifiedcauses corrections regressiontests new test cases

25 25 Debugging Effort time required to diagnose the symptom and determine the cause time required to correct the error and conduct regression tests

26 26 Symptoms & Causes symptom cause symptom and cause may be geographically separated another problem is fixed cause may be due to a combination of non-errors cause may be due to a system or compiler error cause may be due to assumptions that everyone believes symptom may be intermittent

27 27 Consequences of Bugs damage mild annoying disturbing serious extreme catastrophic infectious Bug Type Bug Categories: function-related bugs, function-related bugs, system-related bugs, data bugs, coding bugs, design bugs, documentation bugs, standards violations, etc.

28 28 Debugging Techniques brute force / testing backtracking induction deduction

29 29 Brute Force Test a brute force test is a method of defeating a cryptographic scheme by trying a large number of possibilities; for example, exhaustively working through all possible keys in order to decrypt a message. a brute force test is a method of defeating a cryptographic scheme by trying a large number of possibilities; for example, exhaustively working through all possible keys in order to decrypt a message. cryptographickeys cryptographickeys

30 30 Question & Review session For any query feel free to contact fahad@uettaxila.edu.pk fahad@uettaxila.edu.pk http://web.uettaxila.edu.pk/CMS/seSE2bs/index.asp


Download ppt "1 Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan Software Engineering Muhammad Fahad Khan University Of Engineering."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google