Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding."— Presentation transcript:

1

2

3 Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding distributes nutrient-rich matter  Artesian conditions in underlying alluvial aquifer Logged, drained, channelized Levees built Land Characterization: > 80% Agriculture  Row crops  Rice  Aquaculture Primary concerns for sustainability:  Water Quality  Water Availability

4 Arkansas LouisianaMississippi  Agriculture / Irrigation  3 rd most intensively used aquifer in US in 2000  MS 2 nd largest user behind AR 50-150 ft Gravel/Sand Alluvial extent MS Alluvial aquifer Cone of Depression

5  Irrigation is necessary in the Delta to reach optimum productivity › 28% of annual precipitation › 4 billion gallons per day  Flow in Delta streams is at or near baseflow during the growing season (May-August) › Unknown amount comprised of irrigation return flow The Bogue Phalia (a northwest MS River) at lowest flow in July 2009 Mississippi River Alluvial Aquifer

6

7 Water-level altitude, in feet above sea level ~1 ft per year decline

8

9  Groundwater/Surface-Water Exchange Benefits: › Sustains baseflow in streams › Bank storage dampens overall flood impacts › Streambank stabilization – supplies moisture to riparian vegetation › Temperature regulation for aquatic biota › Supplies nutrients and inorganic ions to stream › Buffer the transport of contaminants through the streambed interface

10 Stream/Aquifer in ConnectionStream/Aquifer not in Connection Losing Stream Gaining Stream -Increased flow in stream -Decreased deposition of fine sediments -NO3 concentrations in stream reduced -Stream recharges alluvial aquifer -Decreased flow in stream -Increased deposition of fine sediments -NO3 concentrations in stream concentrated -What are the affects on recharge? GW dilutes NO3 in stream Anaerobic conditions in aquifer promote denitrification Disconnected Stream

11

12

13 Recharge 0.307 Mississippi River 0.011 Bluff Hills 0.052 Underlying Units -0.022 Discharge to wells -2.19 Stream Leakage 0.120 Water-Table Conditions in 2007 How have water-level declines changed the condition of the alluvial aquifer? Mississippi River -0.002 Bluff Hills 0.035 Underlying Units 0.095 Recharge 0.066 Stream Leakage -0.192 Confined Conditions in 1870 (Predevelopment)

14

15  Employ existing regional flow model to assess future groundwater supply  Develop water use conservation scenarios that vary in amount and distribution  Assess the effects of amount and location of water use conservation

16 Water- Use Reduction (%) Cone of Depression Area (approx. extent)

17

18

19

20 Study Objective Assess the role of groundwater/surface-water exchange on the transport of nutrients in the northwestern MS Assess the feasibility of monitoring groundwater/surface-water exchange at existing streamgaging locations Near-stream piezometers installed July 2010 near existing stream gages Big Sunflower at Clarksdale Big Sunflower at Sunflower Big Sunflower at Anguilla Pressure Transducer: Head Conductance, and Temperature 41.5’ EastWest ~100’ *not to scale Deck for access during high flow Existing Gage House: Stage, Conductance, and Stream Temperature DCP to relay transducer data

21 Losing Conditions: Groundwater Level < Stream Stage Pressure Transducer: Head Conductance, and Temperature 41.5’ EastWest ~100’ *not to scale Deck for access during high flow Existing Gage House: Stage, Conductance, and Stream Temperature DCP to relay transducer data

22  Loss of baseflow to streams › Groundwater is pumped into streams to sustain flow - cost $$ and could exacerbate current water situation › During the growing season, irrigation return flow can make up most of the water in streams › Overuse of surface-water for irrigation has resulted in recent fish kills

23  Increased recharge from the surface › Increases the vulnerability of the aquifer to surface contamination › Recharge is still not sufficient to replace withdrawals

24  Future concerns over water supply for irrigation › State initiated Conjunctive Water Use task force › Dissension over who actually is part of the problem – within the cone of depression versus outside of the cone of depression › Amount of irrigated acreage increasing each year along with new permits for groundwater and surface-water irrigation

25


Download ppt "Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google