Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science Center Lansing, Michigan Great Lakes Water Conservation Conference Madison Wisconsin October 18-19 2010

2

3 Abundance of Water 20 percent of world’s fresh surface water 800,000,000,000,000 cubic feet Regional bedrock aquifers Glacial aquifers > 1000-ft thick 100,000,000,000,000 cubic feet

4 Water Use in Michigan Michigan is was 8 th in population 15 th in total water use 33 rd in water use per capita 25 th in ground-water use

5 Perspective St. Clair River Flow—121,000 MGD Precipitation on Lake Michigan—33,000 MGD Evaporation from Lake Michigan—27,000 MGD Streamflow to Lake Michigan—25,000 MGD Chicago Diversion—2,100 MGD Lower Peninsula Groundwater Use—700 MGD Pfizer—32 MGD Lansing BWL—20 MGD Agricultural Irrigation Well—1 MGD Nestle Waters/Ice Mountain—0.36 MGD

6 Regional abundance gives us our landscape Makes our lakes Great. Streams too. But says nothing about how much water is available for human use.

7 Regional abundance does not mean a lack of local shortages or competing uses …consider total assets and cash flow

8 Competition for water can be regional too

9 Hydrology and Ecology— A Missing New Link Hydrology is a principal driver of aquatic ecology Hydrologists know little ecology and Ecologists know little hydrology Aquatic ecosystems are a focus of most water availability discussions How much water do we need to leave in the stream?

10 There is No Unused Water All water is being used by someone or something Humans change what the water is being used for All human use of water has an effect on someone or something—often local Often the effect is not noticeable or is perceived to be outweighed by a benefit (Chicago Diversion)

11 There is No Unused Water Human uses of water redistribute water in time and place A dam may alter the high and low flows of a river A city with an intake in a Great Lake may discharge used water to a stream that is tributary to the lake A groundwater use will always have an effect on a surface-water body, though the effect may be too small to measure

12 Groundwater –Surface Water A Single Resource

13 Water Use—Effects on Distribution Reduced flow to SW—59% Induced GW flow from outside area—18% Reduced Storage—11% Reduced flow to Lake MI—8% Induced flow from Lake MI—4% Pumping from Deep Bedrock Aquifer in SE Wisconsin Sources of Water to Wells

14 What is Water Use? Detroit land cover change 1905-1992 Changes in land cover affect: recharge streamflow wetlands water quality

15 What is Water Use? Drain Tiles Lower water tables Less recharge Faster movement to streams Fewer wetlands More useable land

16 Does the amount of a water use matter or just the IMPACT of the use: changing where water goes, when it goes there, and its quality

17 Withdrawals and Consumptive Uses: …no significant individual or cumulative adverse impacts to the quantity or quality of the Waters and Water Dependent Natural Resources of the Watershed Great Lakes Compact

18 Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool and Process Assist Michigan in implementation of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Compact and Agreement Michigan legislation defines and prohibits Adverse Resource Impacts (ARI) to water- dependent natural resources in streams Process designed to ensure proposed withdrawals are legal—with burden on proposer

19 WWAT—Three Models Flow—How much water is in the stream? Withdrawal—How much will a proposed withdrawal reduce streamflow? Fish—How will reduced streamflow affect fish? The WWAT evaluates the impact of the water use, not the amount. If the impact is not “adverse”, then it is ok

20 Ecological Response Curves Response Curves predict how characteristic fishes will respond to changes in index flow

21 Development of WWAT Compact and Michigan Legislation provided the need to define “adverse” resource impact Science provided the context within which to define “adverse” State government made policy definition of “adverse” Water Resource Conservation Advisory Council provided a collaborative context for policy makers and scientists to iteratively inform each other

22 Does the amount of a water use matter or just the IMPACT of the use: changing where water goes, when it goes there, and its quality …then is water conservation also is more than just the amount conserved? Isn’t it about the IMPACT of the conservation?

23 Water Use and Conservation The effect matters, not the amount

24 Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land—Aldo Leopold


Download ppt "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google