New NFA Review Process Updates CP Coffee April 13, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New NFA Review Process Updates CP Coffee April 13, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 New NFA Review Process Updates CP Coffee April 13, 2015

2 Fourteen NFAs submitted* *As of 4/7/15 **CNS Issued

3  Atlas Building  First NFA issued  Asbestos only remediation  INOD sent – minor comments only  83 days submittal to sign-off  Fairmont Creamery  INOD (8 pg) sent – 7 day response  CNS needed by 12/31 – tax abatement  70 days submittal to sign-off CNS’ Issued

4 Time  Legal group comments  Affidavit instructions  Submittal vs. issuance dates NFA Template Updates CP develops NFA CP finalizes NFA CP Issues Final NFA NFA Issuance Affidavit Volunteer reviews CP gives NFA to volunteer via transmittal letter Volunteer’s Written Notice of Submittal CP Receives Notice of Submittal CP submits to Agency for CNS NFA Submittal Affidavit

5  Risk group comments  New tables  Include exposure point/MCA data  CP suggestions  Clearer instructions  Better instructions on Table 4.1  Expand asbestos narrative in section 2.3 NFA Template Updates

6  Changes made and posted  Ver. 3/9/15  http://epa.ohio.gov/portals/30/vap/docs/NFA%20Letter%2 0template%203-9-15.docx http://epa.ohio.gov/portals/30/vap/docs/NFA%20Letter%2 0template%203-9-15.docx  Template still subject to change  Please provide more input as we go along NFA Template Updates

7  After 10 CNS’ issued evaluate entire process  Review timelines  Sufficient time allowed?  INOD/FNOD comments  Type and style of comments?  NFA submittals  Getting needed information? NFA Process Review

8  Cinci Die Cast  Foundry until 2001 – vacated 2007  Structure razed 2011  Listed six IAs  Future use is commercial/industrial New Rule NFA

9  Pathways  Direct contact – C/I  Direct contact – C/E  Groundwater – Class B upper zone  VI (potential future buildings  Developed background demo (As)  PSRA – J&E modeling for VI Site facts

10  Soil Excavation in IA-1  Soil exceeded saturation – elevated TPH  No RMP / O&M needed  EC  Limit to C/I  Prohibition on g.w. extraction Site facts

11  Letter generated  Eight pages  20 individual comments  Comments evenly distributed b/t all reviewers INOD

12  Inconsistencies  Volunteer name  Acreage  Clarity required  Number of soil samples per IA  Possible inappropriate combination of releases to single IA  Re-designation of IA  Off-property release as IA – table/text revisions INOD Comments

13  Potential O&M needed  Slab left in place – engineering control or not?  More inconsistencies  C/E dir. contact w/g.w. listed in section 3.1 not in section 2.5  VOCs listed in five IAs  VI pathway only assessed in one IA INOD Comments

14  Background  Incorrectly listed soil study value in text  Clarify which soils being compared – soil type  HHRA  No std. developed for C/E g.w. – reasonably complete INOD Comments

15  Groundwater  No POGWMUPUS demo to lower zone  Upper zone dirty, therefore POGWMUPUS applies to lower  Arsenic value not in Table 4.1  Legal  EC comments INOD Comments

16  Generated many same (i.e., number and style) comments as past NFA reviews  Focused to clarification and consistency revisions  All rule based – citations for each INOD Comment Summary

17  Re-submit revise executive summary as necessary, and  Revise supporting documentation accordingly! Be sure to:

18 Questions


Download ppt "New NFA Review Process Updates CP Coffee April 13, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google