Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for."— Presentation transcript:

1 ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION

2 Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for all data for any level of NSF funding Supplementary 2-page document (max) Optional: Also part of 15-page (max) Project Description BASICS Source: Special Information and Supplementary Documentation, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j

3 Must address both physical and digital data Must include sufficient information for assessment “Efficiency and effectiveness” of the DMP will be considered BASICS+

4 stimulate new advances allow prompt evaluation “Such dissemination of data is necessary for the community to stimulate new advances as quickly as possible and to allow prompt evaluation of the results by the scientific community. “ – NSF (italics mine) Part of Openness trend in government (data.gov) NIH Public Access Policy (2008) H.R. 5037 – Data accessibility applies to all federal research agencies (2010) “Phase one” of effort to make sure data obtained by federal monies is available to general public WHY?

5 Data is expected to “explain and defend results” Archiving and accessibility standards determined by Community of Interest (COI) and institution Data should be made available in reasonable amount of time (COI) Data availability must meet COI standards of privacy and confidentiality of human subjects DMP must explain legal issues involved in cases of non-release of proprietary data (COI) SHARING EXPLAINED

6 Data Management Plans are required even if a project is not expected to generate data that requires sharing DMP should clearly explain non-sharing in light of COI standards (peer review) Between the lines: Not sharing will require justification and close scrutiny by NSF Sharing is preferred NOTHING TO SHARE?

7 Factual material (physical or digital) necessary to validate findings as defined by COI Minimal level of data retention defined by specific Directorates, Offices, Divisions, and Programs More robust data retention/access standards defined by COI should be followed and explained in DMP WHAT DATA IS COVERED?

8 Analyzed data (incl. images, tables and tables of numbers used for making graphs) Metadata that defines how data was generated, such as experiment descriptions, computer code, and computer-calculation input MINIMAL DATA RETENTION EXAMPLE 1: ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE Source: Requirements by Directorate, http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsphttp://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp

9 Investigators are expected to preserve/share primary data, samples, physical collections, & supporting materials Provide easily accessible information about data holdings, including quality assessments and guidance/finding aids Data may be made available through submission to national data center, publication in journal, book, or accessible website of institutional archives MINIMAL DATA RETENTION EXAMPLE 2: DIVISION OF EARTH SCIENCES

10 Principal investigators are required to submit all data collected to a designated National Data Center (e.g., National Oceanographic Data Center) Physical samples (cores, sediment, dredge) must be archived, curated and made available to investigators on request Metadata must be prepared and made available where no data or sample repository exists MINIMAL DATA RETENTION EXAMPLE 3: DIV. OF OCEAN SCIENCES

11 Data sets: fully cleaned and documented data should be placed in data archive or library Researchers “should consider whether and how” to keep or store physical data materials (e.g., handwritten reports, video tapes, microfilm) Tabulated data from experimental research should be made available to investigators requesting data MINIMAL DATA RETENTION EXAMPLE 4: DIRECTORATE FOR SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL & ECONOMIC SCIENCES

12 COI defines data parameters For example (from Engineering Directorate): Raw data (preliminary analysis) Paper drafts Peer reviews Communications with colleagues WHAT DATA MAY NOT BE COVERED?

13 1.Expected Data: types, physical/electronic collections, materials to be produced 2.Standards to be used for data and metadata format and content 3.Policies for access and sharing including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENT

14 4.Policies and provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives 5.Plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for preservation of access to them DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENT+

15 DMP costs can be included in proposal budget Costs must be justified according to applicable cost principles (i.e., they make sense according to the nature and scope of the proposal) Costs are necessary to implement DMP per COI standards COSTS

16 Minimal standards for types of data and retention/sharing may not exist at this point Check with specific office or directorate responsible for proposal area for guidance and review Data Management & Sharing FAQs: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmpfaqs.jsp http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmpfaqs.jsp WHERE DO I START?


Download ppt "ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google