Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 1 Agenda –5/02/2014 Wed. Unit 84 Howard J Rattliff, Jr. – Principles of Technology.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 1 Agenda –5/02/2014 Wed. Unit 84 Howard J Rattliff, Jr. – Principles of Technology."— Presentation transcript:

1 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 1 Agenda –5/02/2014 Wed. Unit 84 Howard J Rattliff, Jr. – Principles of Technology - Course # 130227200 -

2 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 5/02/2014 Unit #84 - Friday: Last Lecture on Wed 4/30 Unit 83 >> : Exam Review and Discussion with Students. Exam Review and Discussion with Students. Today’s Objectives: Team Project Peer Assessment FeedbackTeam Project Peer Assessment Feedback The (Nominal Group Technique) NGT group processThe (Nominal Group Technique) NGT group process Note: “To Be” Resume’ project that was due on 4/25 is still being graded. 2

3 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 3 Legend: Instructor Class Individuals Assignment/ Discussions SME = Subject Matter Expert Unit 84 Agenda,, Rm 219 - On Campus Dress: Business Casual,, Rm 219 - On Campus Dress: Business Casual StartEndTopic/Discussion Teacher / Instructor Duration Time Elapse Time Counter 1:251:30 Meeting Final Checks (and Dial in -Not Applicable Mr Rattliff 0:000:00 1:301:30 > -- Welcome - Introductions of any Guests? > -- Welcome - Introductions of any Guests? Mr Rattliff 0:000:00 1:301:35 Class Roster (1st 5 minutes of Class) - Mr Rattliff 0:050:05 1:351:35 Agenda for Today & Logistics Agenda for Today & Logistics Mr Rattliff 0:000:05 1:351:40 Today’s Class Objectives: 1.Newsletter Team Peer Assessment Feedback “” 0:050:10 1:401:45 Quick Review Last Lesson “” 0:050:15 1:451:50 Use Excel etc as a tool to summarize Voting – eg. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Voting Techniques and Forms in Excel “”0:050:20 1:502:10 Animation Lab – Self Paced 0:200:40 2:102:25 Peer Assessment worksheet feedback 0:150:55 2:252:25 Next steps and assignments (Unit 85 – Monday Use of Animation cont’d “” 0:000:55 See Reading Assignment.

4 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 4 Assignment --- No New Reading Assignment Today. Recent Reading Assignments – was due Monday 4/21 PP2.9 to PP2.20 working with tables in Powerpoint. And Enhancing Objects (rotation (PP 2.30), cropping (PP 2.23), shapes (PP 2.27), text box or placeholder (PP 2.32), slide background (preview function before selecting PP 2.40)). Possible Quiz on Monday (April 21st) on reading assignment. Most Recent Reading Assignments – Due Friday 4/25 pages PP2.42 – PP2.46> working with and editing the Master Slides in Powerpoint. PP 2.47 thru PP 2.60. > Using Animation & Sound effects, PP 2.73 – PP2.74 Customized Print settings and printing slides. No New Reading Assignment Today.

5 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. Group Processes  Team Measurement and Performance Feedback is Often Difficult in a Team Environment.  Excel is a good tool to use to capture, calculate and summarize this data.  There are several methods used but the Voting techniques such as the Nominal Group Techniques (NGT [1] ) are very commonly used for choice selection or competing alternatives. –Everyone has an equal vote or input –Grassroots and stakeholder driven –In the basic method, the numbers (votes, etc.) each alternative receives are totaled, and the alternative or choice with the highest (i.e. most favored) total ranking is selected as the final decision. –The basic scoring technique to can be modified to incorporate other measurement techniques such as Rubric and Weighting scores to reflect key requirements. –In practice, Management typically retains the final decision but user input significantly influences the choice.  Bottom-line – Very Flexible and Useful Technique. Widely Use! [1]. This technique was originally developed by Delbecq and VandeVen, Delbecq A. L. and VandeVen A. H, (1971). "A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning, " Journal Of Applied Behavioral Science VII (July/August, 1971), 466 -91 Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_group_technique

6 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. Newsletter Project Peer Assessment Results - Team or Group Measurement Technique - Raw Test Statistics for Assignment: Fnl Grade Book Metrics Student number14 Class Avg Grade90.07 Highest Grade99 Lowest Grade76 Grade Distribution in the 90's8 in the 80's3 in the 70's3 in 60's0 below 60's0

7 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. Newsletter Peer Assessment  Individual feedback sheets provided based upon the team assignment  I have generalized and summarized the information provided –The specific feedback provided is confidential  Teacher available to discuss the feedback remarks to help you improve!

8 Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 8 End


Download ppt "Authored - H Rattliiff © 2014. All Rights Reserved. UME Prep Use Only. 1 Agenda –5/02/2014 Wed. Unit 84 Howard J Rattliff, Jr. – Principles of Technology."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google