Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Publishing and Refereeing in a Distributed World - the Views of a Physicist and a Librarian Eberhard.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Publishing and Refereeing in a Distributed World - the Views of a Physicist and a Librarian Eberhard."— Presentation transcript:

1 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Publishing and Refereeing in a Distributed World - the Views of a Physicist and a Librarian Eberhard R. Hilf (Institute for Science Networking at Oldenburg University) and Hans-Joachim Wätjen (Library and Information System of Oldenburg University) www.bis.uni-oldenburg.de/abt1/waetjen/genf/ LIBER Workshop on The Open Archives initiative (OAi) and Peer Review Journals in Europe – 22.-24. March 2001 at CERN -

2 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals A discussion in the train Scientist...Scientist... did not know what services he was deprived of. Librarian...Librarian... assumed to know what services are good for science. did ask the scientists: „What new services are needed?“ The young Elsevier...

3 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals What refereeing do we need ? Instant publishing before refereeingInstant publishing before refereeing Time stamp for prime researchTime stamp for prime research Archiving of relevant informationArchiving of relevant information Competitive refereeingCompetitive refereeing Multilevel refereeingMultilevel refereeing Full information published to be fair to refereesFull information published to be fair to referees Open refereeing [Annotation linking]Open refereeing [Annotation linking] Voluntary refereeing to be a pleasure for refereesVoluntary refereeing to be a pleasure for referees

4 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Principles for Document Services for the Sciences Must be scalable [10 Bill. Docs in Physics/a]Must be scalable [10 Bill. Docs in Physics/a] Distributed data bases [author controlled]Distributed data bases [author controlled] Free distribution [author´s right]Free distribution [author´s right] Worldwide accepted Metadata standards [DC]Worldwide accepted Metadata standards [DC] Free access to all research results [ownership]Free access to all research results [ownership] Comply with needs of scientistsComply with needs of scientists Competitive add-on servicesCompetitive add-on services

5 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals PhysNet as seen by OAi www.eps.org/PhysNet The Concept An open archive started in 1995 [cooperation with Math, IMU]An open archive started in 1995 [cooperation with Math, IMU] Transfer of Concept by CRISP1,2,3; IuK1999 at JenaTransfer of Concept by CRISP1,2,3; IuK1999 at Jena IuK, DINI, EPSIuK, DINI, EPS

6 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals PhysNet as Data Provider Collection of data providers: the authors at their local institutionsCollection of data providers: the authors at their local institutions Any information on the local web server: research, admin, teaching, homepages, journals, conf and job lists,...Any information on the local web server: research, admin, teaching, homepages, journals, conf and job lists,...

7 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals PhysNet metadata Fully DC compliant [DC:sci.cooperation]Fully DC compliant [DC:sci.cooperation] Provide author tools [MMM, pers-home]Provide author tools [MMM, pers-home] Technical cooperation with Math-NetTechnical cooperation with Math-Net DC:Frankfurt: workflow coupled to metadataDC:Frankfurt: workflow coupled to metadata OAi compliance by 8. March 2001OAi compliance by 8. March 2001 Acceptance and usage 2% of documents come with metadata 2% of documents come with metadata 1 in 1000 home pages come with metadata 1 in 1000 home pages come with metadata usage is 30.000/month usage is 30.000/month 1% of institutes joined formally 1% of institutes joined formally

8 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals PhysNet as Service Provider Distributed gatherers under local control: [about 40 local, regional, national gatherers]Distributed gatherers under local control: [about 40 local, regional, national gatherers] Distributed independent Brokers: [US, DE, Russia, Hungary, France, UK, DK, India, Japan, Australia,..., EPS] (NSF-DFG: VT, Uol, SSB)Distributed independent Brokers: [US, DE, Russia, Hungary, France, UK, DK, India, Japan, Australia,..., EPS] (NSF-DFG: VT, Uol, SSB) From Harvest to CycladesFrom Harvest to Cyclades Scheme umbrellaed by EPS, controlled by ACPusC umbrellaed by EPS, controlled by ACPusC Charter [released 29.3.2001]: unbiased cooperation, nonprofit, shared workforce Charter [released 29.3.2001]: unbiased cooperation, nonprofit, shared workforce Cooperation agreement with Math:Net Cooperation agreement with Math:Net Driven by Science needs Driven by Science needs Technical coalition: CCSD, IWI, ISN,.. Technical coalition: CCSD, IWI, ISN,..

9 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals What you expect from us – and we expect from you? OAi data base for smaller Physics Depts.OAi data base for smaller Physics Depts. Improve provider´s serviceImprove provider´s service Import metadata from other OAi data bases in PhysicsImport metadata from other OAi data bases in Physics Add-on servicesAdd-on services You to join existing metadata standardsYou to join existing metadata standards You to share softwareYou to share software You to add your lab and yourself to the distributed registry http://www.eps.org/PhysNetYou to add your lab and yourself to the distributed registry http://www.eps.org/PhysNet http://www.eps.org/PhysNet

10 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals But... what is the summary of the physicist´s demands?what is the summary of the physicist´s demands? what will be the scenario of tomorrow for data providers?what will be the scenario of tomorrow for data providers? –A subject based approach? –An institution based approach? what for service providers?what for service providers? what can and must be done to manage the change?what can and must be done to manage the change?

11 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals The World of Today: Scholarly Publishing, Peer Reviewing, Metadata, and Archiving Library Publisher PhysDoc Physics Dep. arXiv Peer Reviewing Document + Metadata National Library A lot of work for the author! Exclusive rights for the publisher! Some e-prints free for the community! High subscr. prices for the library! Author

12 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals The World of Today: Searching - Retrieving Library A OPAC Publisher A Server PhysDoc A+I Serv. A arXiv A lot of work for the user! Publisher B Server Library B OPAC A+I Serv. B SFX or MetaSearch Cross Ref.Links A lot of technical effort for the providers!

13 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Scenario for Tomorrow: OAi Data and Service Providers + Peer Reviewing Library Publ. Physics Dep. Referees other Univ. Referees Learned Soc. Document Metadata National Library Archiving Author Documents Reviews Metadata Service X arXiv PhysDoc Data Provider Service Provider Multi-level Peer Rev.

14 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Scenario for Tomorrow: Searching - Retrieving Competition by -quality of add-ons -level of refereeing -quality of contents -specialization -depth of search -size -comfort of retrieval -level of integration -local focus -... PublisherServer PhysDoc arXiv Library A+I Serv. A

15 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Advantages of this Scenario Less work for the author! Non-exclusive rights for the publisher! Most e-prints free for the community! Lower costs for the library! Value-added services by different providers! Easy integration of metadata into existing services! Open multi- level peer reviewing! Less printed journals but more accessible e-publications! Immediate publication! OAi = „Napster for the Sciences“ Richard Sietmann in: c´t 6/2001, S. 78

16 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Activitities in e-Archives Universities / Univ. LibrariesUniversities / Univ. Libraries –OPUS (Stuttgart...) –Eldorado (Dortmund) –e-Lib (Osnabrück) –MILESS (Essen) –COPACABANA (Oldenburg)... Regional Bibliographic Utility SystemsRegional Bibliographic Utility Systems –PiCarta GBV Göttingen –BSZ-Media Server Baden-Württemberg –DigiBib North-Rhine-Westfalia... National ProjectsNational Projects –GlobalInfo (BMBF) –DissOnline (DFG) –Virtual Subject-based Library (DFG) Institution owned free e- publications are mostly: Diss.Diss. ThesesTheses MultimediaMultimedia old digit. Materialold digit. Material but nearly no non-profit e-Journalsnon-profit e-Journals

17 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Example of an activity in a peer reviewed, non-profit, virtual University Press Cooperation of universities in North Germany (Hamburg, Oldenburg, Bremen, Kiel, Rostock, Greifswald): in evaluation of teaching and researchin evaluation of teaching and research in usage and production of multimediain usage and production of multimedia in e-publishing and establishing a joint university press for e-publicationsin e-publishing and establishing a joint university press for e-publications –pilot project of Hamburg + Oldenburg + possibly NN (North-Rhine-Westfalia) –peer reviewing between different universities –shared functions (work flow system, marketing...) –separate functions (business model, financing...)  virtual university press of an open and growing number of online and peer-reviewed university presses

18 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals National activities to support the OAi DINI German Initiative for Networked InformationDINI German Initiative for Networked Information –similar to CNI –Cooperation between Research Libraries (DBV),Research Libraries (DBV), Computer Centres (ZKI)Computer Centres (ZKI) Media Centres (AMH) andMedia Centres (AMH) and IuK Initiative of Learned SocietiesIuK Initiative of Learned Societies to improve the information infrastructure –DINI´s appeal to join the OAi (2000) –DINI workshops for German data providers to support the implementation of the OAi specification (planned for June 2001)

19 19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals We need... vision of e-paper by Xerox cooperation, persuasive power, acceptance!


Download ppt "19.03.2001Hilf / Wätjen: OAi and Peer Reviewed Journals Publishing and Refereeing in a Distributed World - the Views of a Physicist and a Librarian Eberhard."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google