1. MAP Final Results Theresa Hinkebein Cape Girardeau School District Curriculum Coordinator November 15, 2010 Slide 1

2. MSIP Standard 6.2 MSIP Standard 6.2 requires the school board to annually review disaggregated performance data for all subgroups with 5 or more students in order to monitor student achievement and dropout/graduation rates. Subgroup achievement data is available for review on the school board portal.  AYP Summary  AYP 2010 for each school site  Achievement level subgroup report for each school site Slide 2

3. Data Analysis Plan CSIP I.C.1. Annually complete the district Data Analysis Plan 1.AYP Overview  2007-2010  Upward movement  Downward movement  Flatline  Peaks and valleys 2.Content Item Analysis  GLEs below 70%  Frequency of QT and DOK  Frequency of GLE code  Discuss and summarize Slide 3

4. Data Analysis Plan CSIP I.C.1. Annually complete the district Data Analysis Plan 3.Instructional Goals  Short term  Long term 4. Professional Development  Current plan  District/Building  2011-2012 5.Safe Harbor 6.Local and State comparison Slide 4

5. MAP-Like vs. MAP Predictor MAP-Like Communication Arts (75% DRA + 25% writing assessment ) Math (benchmarks) DRA  Reading engagement  Accuracy (miscue analysis)  Fluency  Comprehension (before, during, and after reading)  questioning/prediction  literal comprehension  Summarization  Interpretation  Reflection  Metacognitive awareness  Continuum (scoring guide)  Focus for instruction District Writing Assessment  Writing prompts across writing genres  Scoring guide developed by literacy coaches and MAP graders based on MAP scoring guide  Includes 6+1 traits of writing Math  Began with benchmarks from math textbook resources  Math coach aligned to pacing Slide 5

6. Reasons to Use Caution When Using Local Assessment Data to Predict MAP Scores 1.1 test 1x a year 2. Advanced and Proficient only  Basic  Average students 3. Anxiety/Stress  Teacher/Student  Test-takers Slide 6

7. Reasons to Use Caution When Using Local Assessment Data to Predict MAP Scores 4. Strictly timed portions  Practice  Quality (knowledge) vs. Quantity (how fast) 5. Changing test  GLEs  Question Type  DOK  Suspension of PE  CCS-A 6. Teach-the-Test  We do not teach the test. We teach the entire curriculum.  Prepare all year long, give tools, test-taking strategies Slide 7

8. Reasons to Use Caution When Using Local Assessment Data to Predict MAP Scores 7.Criterion-Referenced Assessments  Our local assessments are intended to be criterion-referenced; designed to provide a measure of performance that is interpretable in terms of clearly defined learning tasks.  MAP is a combination of norm-referenced and criterion- referenced. Norm-referenced assessments are designed to provide a measure of performance that is interpretable in terms of an individual’s relative standing in some known group. 8. Test Security  Strict guidelines  Cannot discuss test items  Cannot paraphrase test questions  No oral reading  Cover-up all content and process cues Slide 8

9. Local Assessment Committee CSIP I.C.2.a Form a local assessment committee  Evaluating current district required assessments  Addressing concerns  Decision making Slide 9

10. Local Assessment Schedule  3 windows  Benchmark 1 data presented in January w/findings CSIP I.C.2.f Report local and state assessment data to the school board 2010-2011 District Assessment Schedule Slide 10

11. Common Core Standard-Assessment Two Consortiums  SBAC  PARCC CCS-A  2 summative assessments  Expect online assessments  Expect MC, CR, PE  Optional benchmark assessments  Tools for informal assessment of student progress  Target field test-spring 2013  Operational test-spring 2014 Slide 11

12. Status  CGPS is improving scores on state testing  MAP-like required assessments to monitor student progress (3x)  Using local and state data to inform instruction  Targeting student strengths and weaknesses based on data  Professional development based on needs identified from data Slide 12 State Targets20102011 CA67.475.5 MA63.372.5