Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarjorie Drusilla Willis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Keshe Technologies
2
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending The Keshe Foundation Created by Nuclear Engineer M.T. Keshe Holder of Intellectual rights International Patent Applications, more in progress. Methods related to new nuclear processes Range of Applications of these processes Concepts of static reactors Concepts of dynamic reactors. Goals: Activate Social and Economic Progress
3
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Mehran Tavakoli KESHE Born in Tehran, Iran. Aug.2,1958 UK-resident, British-travel docs. Married 1979-1981 Engineer Nuclear reactor design and technology - Queen Mary (Univ. of London) 1980 British Nuclear Fuel 1981-2004: Private study on nuclear concepts 1982-2002: Private owned international trading 2002-2006: Full private R&D on plasma reactors. Several prototypes. Invited to Belgium by FLAG
4
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Mission Statement Apply newly discovered nuclear principles for Human Benefit Deliver solutions for Global Problems: Global Warming Energy Shortage Water related problems Food Shortage Develop new Technologies and Materials
5
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending New Approach in Physics Today: I.e. Frank Wilzcek (Quarks, Gluons, Virtual Sea, Vibrations like music tones) Keshe vision: Interacting Plasmatic Magnetic Energy Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can entangle (fuse) Plasmatic Magnetic Fields can separate (fissile) “Particles” are in fact SEPMAF’s (Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields) Behavior of SEPMAF’s can be influenced in a soft way in view of a preferred outcome (I.e. at room-temperature)
6
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Visualization Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields
7
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Visualization Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields
8
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Visualization Specific Entangled Plasmatic Magnetic Fields
9
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Actual Proof of Technology Proven Confirmed Carbon separation at atomic level (sp2/sp3, superconductive properties and atomic insulation layers) (IMEC, SCK) Production of voltage and current (SCK) Production of Cold Plasma (Hydrogen) (SCK) Generation of EUV (Extreme Ultra Violet) Generation of EM Fields Lifting effects measured Indications Self-sustaining process (SCK) Magnetic shield effects
10
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Proof of Technology By static reactorsBy dynamic reactors
11
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Static reactors Tests of static reactor (CO 2, Voltage, Current) Simple basic container (Cola bottle) to be sealed Room temperature Per test filled with different compositions of liquids Low cost of materials Terminals: Cu wires Source: RA source or generated RA Isotopes Working for 5 years (if in correct container)
12
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Electrodes in a static reactor
13
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Carbon extraction source
14
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Carbon from Plastic or CO2
15
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Treatment of copper wires
16
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Treatment of copper wires
17
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Measuring properties
18
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Measuring diamond properties
19
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Testing in pure plasma
20
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Dynamic reactors Tests of dynamic reactors Steel and plastic cores Temperature independent Per test filled with different compositions of gasses Low cost of materials Easy manufacturing Rotative mechanism Source: Low RA source Working for … years (depending of RA material)
21
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Conversion systems Actual nuclear reactors are thermo-nuclear, need triggering input, and have waste problems. Mainly this is the “hard” approach. Keshe plasma reactors are bio-chemical- nuclear, a “soft” approach, applying inside the cavity a number of cosmogenic principles, such as double magnetic fields which can create “gravitational effects” to provide conditions for atomic and molecular separation (fission) and recombination (fusion) of ALL elements of the Periodic Table and their isotopes. Long term self-sustaining processes are possible
22
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Conversion systems In Keshe bio-chemical nuclear plasma reactors one or more nuclear sources is used as a longevity triggering source to provoke a chain of desired chemical, biological and bio-chemical reactions to have a preferred output. Types of output: Energy (heat, current, cooling,...), Creation of specific atoms and molecules (i.e. Atomic hydrogen, pure C) Separation of materials (i.e. Polluted H 2 O), H 2 O Electro-magnetic fields, Gravitational effects.
23
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Large Power systems
24
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Actual Power systems
25
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending New Energy Systems
26
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Keshe Power systems
27
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Keshe Generator
28
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Construction similar to Earth
29
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Fields of Earth
30
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Construction of a reactor
31
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Cooperation for Progress
32
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Application Domains/Markets Consumer electronics White and brown goods Power generation Batteries Automotive Water and Air Treatments Medical Aircarft and Space Exploration Agriculture New Materials Processing systems And much more
33
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: Battery-like/Cells
34
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: Traditional Batteries
35
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: Sales Electricity Suez: 2001 Sales (mil.): $37,755, Electrabel S.A.: 2001 Sales (mil.): $11,143, RWE: 2001 Sales (mil.): $29,498, E.ON: 2001 Sales (mil.): $70,909, Electricité de France : 2001 Sales (mil.): $36,066, Vattenfall: 2001 Sales (mil.): $6,528, Alliant Energy Corporation - 2001 Sales (mil.): $2,777.3, Ameren Corporation : 2001 Sales (mil.): $4,505.9, Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - ELETROBRÁS: 2001 Sales (mil.): $9,251 (30,000MW), Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2002 Sales (mil.): $16,804 (31,800MW), Comisión Federal de Electricidad : 2001 Sales (mil.): $11,033 (39,000MW), The Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales (mil.): $20,961 (37,500MW), The Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated: 2001 Sales (mil.): $41,622 (58,800MW),.... The Israel Electric Corporation Limited 2001 Sales (mil.): $2,381.9..... and many others.
36
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: USA Electricity
37
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: USA $ cents/KWh
38
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: CO2 Collection
39
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: CO2 Emission USA
40
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: GHG emission USA
41
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Roadmap CO2 Company
42
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Market: Graphene (sp2) $9 Billion market in FET Ballistic conductive properties Actually to high priced: 400 Euro/gr KT : Industrial acceptable prices can boost FET’s
43
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Company structure Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL) Kesh Technologies NV (B) Knowledge center Vertical domain specific cVertical domain specific IP Office Admin
44
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Asset & revenue structure Kesh Trust Fund SA (NL) Kesh Technologies NV (B) Knowledge center Vertical domain specific cVertical domain specific IP Office Admin IP owner IP top-down licensing Cost model
45
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Prime Partner Minority stake in vertical Maximum three/four external partners Revenue share Scope Limited license discount Sneak preview Access knowledge center
46
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending Collaborative business Maximum product development Global equal licensing structure No direct competition Cost share Gain share Platform level
47
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending General Remarks Impact: Sufficiency Model Demand/Offer Model Participation of United Nations is essential Blocking of technology must be excluded Emphasis on Social progress Emphasis on development of Local economies No active participation in military applications Respect for existing industrial infrastructure 1. Offering a time frame for adaptation 2. Offering licensing and cooperation 3. Offering participation in R&D 4. Offering participation in verticals
48
© Keshe Foundation 2006. All rights reserved. Patents pending The Value ? Compare … Remember Fleischmann & Pons(1989) Fleischmann (1996) about Cold Fusion: “I think that it is a question of economics … I did a first assessment of what the first successful device would be worth and it came out at about 300 trillion dollars.” “So, at that sort of value, people are prepared to take a rather high risk on the research. I don't think you should over-emphasize the value of cold fusion necessarily, but if you make your list of the ten most valuable projects, high temperature superconductors will always be on the list; fuel cells will always be on the list.” The difference: KT Replicated by Nuclear Agency
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.