1. College of Engineering Trikaripur Cheemeni, Kasaragode Technical Education Quality Improvement Program-Phase II 7 th Review Meeting

2. Institutional Development Plan Specific objectivesAchieved results Promotion of academic excellence: Modernizing Labs, Seminar halls, Computing facility, Digital library and WiFi. Faculty potential:- Pedagogical training, Higher qualification, Improve research capabilities. Established Smart Seminar Halls, Digital Library, Labs modified, More Computers, High speed Internet facility availed. One third of faculty availed Pedagogical training. All BTech faculty is ready for MTech. Six members are doing PhD.

3. Specific objectivesExpected Results Research promotion cell. Setting up research labs with external collaboration. Fitness of student community. Services to society and industry. Equity assurance. To be interacted with global research forums/community. To be achieved through Industry- Institute relationship. By conducting soft skill improvement programs, stress management programs and gym facilities. MoU with lead industries, job oriented training, technical support for local bodies. Counselling, Special coaching, Scholorship to assure equity.

4. Governance Development Plan Question No.Self Assessed Grade Remedial Action to Improve Grade A12The vision and mission are evolved by the college after wide discussion and will be presented in the next BoG for approval. A22The accounts are audited regularly by the competent authority. The utilization of fund are strictly as per the norms of the founding agency. The finance committees strictly adhere to the norms while giving approval to any expenditure. Now the HR is fully satisfactory. A33Preparing for accreditation which is a grading system. A42The different type of auditing – financial, performance and mentors review are different type of monitoring of the head of institution. Question No.Self Assessed Grade Remedial Action to Improve Grade B12The BoG will take necessary steps B22The BoG will be appraised of keeping a register. B32A proposal for conducting a meeting of PTA executive and students representatives with the BoG members can be considered. A-PRIMARY ACCOUNTABILITIES B - OPENNESS & TRANSPERENCY IN THE OPERATION OF GOVERNING BODIES

5. Governance Development Plan(contd.) C - KEY ATTRIBUTES OF GOVERNING BODIES D – EFFECTIVNESS & PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF GOVERNING BODIES Question No. Self Assessed Grade Remedial Action to Improve Grade C32There is no member secretary. The roles have to be specified by the competent authorities. Even without that thing are going on steadily. Question No. Self Assessed Grade Remedial Action to Improve Grade D12Reviewing properly. E – REGULATORY COMPLIENCE Question No. Self Assessed Grade Remedial Action to Improve Grade E12The governing body allows insist that the basic requirements and infrastructural facilities as per AICTE/ University norms are in the college. Additional requirements of any are also arranged.

6. Three departments viz ECE,CSE,EEE applied for accreditation Strength i. Campus infrastructure ii. Library facility iii. High Speed Internet iv. Good academic performance v. Revised Curriculum vi. Strong and relevant Vision and mission Accreditation: Strength & Obstacles

7. Obstacles : i. Faculty Contribution ii. Cadre ratio iii. Poor placement rate iv. No research activity v. Poor faculty retenion vi. No Industry-Institute-Interaction Accreditation: Strength & Obstacles (contd.)

8. Performance & Statutory Audit Report Performance Audit Report Performance Audit 1 Performance Audit 1 Auditor :Prof. T. RADHAKRISHNA Year:2013-14 Audit Date:13th May 2013 to 16 th May 2013 Performance Audit 2 Auditor :Prof. T. RADHAKRISHNA Year :2013-14 Audit Date :25 th March 2014 to 28 th March 2014 Statutory Audit Report Statutory Audit Report Statutory Audit :One per Financial year Auditor :K.A. VenkatachalamAiyer& Co. Financial year:2013-14 Report obtained:26-09-2014

9. Performance & Statutory Audit Report (contd.) Performance Audit PG course not started No improvement in Campus Placement Administrative and Management efficiency improvement is poor None of the UG program is accredited Rectified Portions Faculty vacancy and regular Principal Remedial classes EAP Implementation Pedagogical training Quality upgradation of faculty MoU with ICT Academy to improve placement activities

10. Procurement Details Procurement completed for Rs. 4,99,78,260. Delivery completed but payment pending for Rs. 12,62,416. Procurement in plan for Rs. 35,36,250 Package NameEST AmountStatus Firewall286250/-Quotation Invited FM Lab600000/-Not initiated Computers1000000/-Not initiated Wooden Table300000/-Not initiated Civil work renovation of Seminar Hall 1350000/-Not initiated Total3536250/-