Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

2 Value of Water A resource is cheap when it is plentiful: –The price goes up as it becomes scarce –This is a scarcity value –The water-diamond paradox As the price goes up, we begin to substitute: –one product for another –one location for another We can also become more efficient

3

4 Role of Governments As water provider: –Many utilities are started for the purpose of providing water and wastewater services –Needed to promote industry and development Large reservoirs in the West as well as TVA in the Southeast As water regulator: –Must allocate based on efficient and equitable uses –Must protect the environment

5

6 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

7 Public vs. Private Good –Public: A shared resource that the general public directly benefits from, but does not interfere with or diminish the use by others (air, water recreation, national defense) –Private: A commodity that can’t be shared with others (milk, gas) Public vs. Private Use –Public: Use by the general public (fountains, rivers, lakes) –Private: Use by individuals (agriculture, industry, water mill)

8 Privatization The delegation of water management to the private sector –Private utilities provide 15% of US water and wastewater services In 1999, Atlanta decided to privatize their water system –United Water, a subsidiary of Suez (French company) received a 20-year lease in operate a drinking water plant, three wastewater plants, their water distribution system, as well as operation and maintenance (O&M) –United Water received $21.4 million per year, and was projected to save Atlanta $400 million during the 20-year lease January 2003, Atlanta withdrew the lease –Higher than expected O&M costs –Poor water service and water quality problems

9 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

10 Water Affordability 1.1 billion (out of world population of almost 7 billion) people don’t have access to safe drinking water Even more don’t have access to wastewater systems Average cost of water in US is small (0.5% of income) –But this is harder for low-income people In 1990s, France passed laws to guarantee access to water –Can’t cut off water to homes with children or elderly Average residential water use in the US –Toilets => 36%Bath & shower=> 28% –Outdoor => 16%Laundry => 20% Some water agencies use price incentives to reduce water use Many states (including GA) require low-flow toilets in new homes

11 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

12 Water Marketing According to most economists, letting the market put a price on water is a way to ensure it is used efficiently Water marketing is common in Western states –Between individual irrigators –Between irrigators and cities –Between irrigators and industry Conflict between desire to use local resource for economic benefit and concept that water is a public resource

13 Unregulated water markets Example: Farmers sell their water to cities –Direct impacts: Farmers makes a lot of money, cities builds a lots of new homes –Indirect impacts: The local economies go broke Local counties lose taxes that farmers paid Local businesses lose sales (fertilizer, feed, seed, farm equipment) Regulated water markets Water transfers restricted to local region Water transfers restricted to type of use –Ag => Ag, City => City, Industry => Industry Non-local water transfers must be approved by the local region

14 Murray-Darling Basin Australia’s largest river system –19 inches (500 mm) annual rainfall –50% of Australia’s cropland –75% of Australia’s irrigated land –10% of population –Three states: New South Wales, Queensland, & Victoria 1917 => Water management agency adopted –Murray-Darling Basin Commission –Unlimited water use for irrigation 1980s => shortages, low flows, soil salinization 1981 => limits imposed and trading was allowed 1990s => water selling for $86 per acre-foot per year

15

16 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

17 Water Banking The state buys and sells water resources –Takes surplus and/or unneeded water –Stores it and then sells it to users Lakes for surface water, aquifers for ground water –Can also require that a certain percentage (say 10%) of every private water transfer goes into the bank - a transfer fee.

18 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing –Surface water marketing –Ground water marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

19 Pollutant Trading An example is Cap and Trade –A cap is placed on how much point sources can emit (lbs of phosphorus per year, for example) –If a point source is emitting less than cap then they can sell excess credits (in lbs of phosphorus) Trading system in the Tar-Pamlico River, North Carolina –Nitrogen and phosphorus credits –Mostly point source trades Trading system in the Murray-Darling basin –Salinity credits

20 If a point source exceeds their cap they can: Install advanced technology to remove pollutants –Very expensive –Limited reduction in pollution –Much cheaper to reduce nonpoint sources or trade Buy credits from point source that has credits to sell –Price is determined by buyer and seller –Trades are restricted to watershed –Free market determines the most efficient way to reduce total watershed pollution –Trades between point sources are common –Trades between point sources (buyers) and nonpoint sources (sellers) less common due to uncertainty in nonpoint source control

21 Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing –Surface water marketing –Ground water marketing Water Banking Pollution Fees and Credits Environmental Values

22 What are the economic values of improved water quality or leaving more water in streams to support wildlife? –Difficult question for economists... Use studies to measure the public’s willingness to pay What are the values of ecosystem services?

23 Chapter Summary The value of water increases as it becomes more scarce Two views of water: a public resource or a private good Regulated water markets are being used to re-allocate water between users. Regulations are needed to ensure efficiency and equity. Assigning an economic value to water’s environmental benefits is difficult


Download ppt "Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google