Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management Climate Change Response ProgramNational Park Service July 14, 2014 SCB, Missoula,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management Climate Change Response ProgramNational Park Service July 14, 2014 SCB, Missoula,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management Climate Change Response ProgramNational Park Service July 14, 2014 SCB, Missoula, MT John GrossAndy Hansen Tom OlliffBill Monahan Dave TheobaldForrest Melton Scott GoetzNathan Piekielek Tony ChangPatrick Jantz

2 Pinyon mortality at Bandelier National Monument. Photo: Craig Allen

3 What should we do?

4 4 Mitigation: Reducing causes of climate change, mostly reducing GHGs. Adaptation: Adjusting to and coping with actual or expected climate changes.

5 Managing Natural Resources under Climate Change Time horizon longer than planning and management horizons Relevant areas larger than management units High uncertainties in science (climate change, ecological response) and management effectiveness Coordination among multiple management units and jurisdictions Approach and methods rapidly evolving Challenges

6 Goal Demonstrate the four steps of a climate adaptation planning strategy using NASA and other data and models, in two LCCs. 1. Identify Conservation Targets 1. Identify Conservation Targets 2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change 2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change 4. Implement Management Options 4. Implement Management Options 3. Identify Management Options 3. Identify Management Options Monitor, Review, Revise (Stein & Glick 2011) Landscape Climate Change Vulnerability Project (LCC-VP )

7 NASA Applied Sciences Program Project Team (LCC-VP) Montana State University A. Hansen, N. Piekielek, T. Chang, L. Phillips, E. Garroutte NPS / Great Northern LCC T. Olliff NPS I&M & CCRP Programs B. Monahan, J. Gross CSU Monterey Bay / NASA Ames F. Melton, W. Wang Conservation Science Partners D. Theobald Woods Hole Research Center S. Goetz, P. Jantz, T. Cormier, S. Zolkos Great Smoky Mountain NP

8 Western US Great Northern LCC - Tom Olliff NPS I&M Greater Yellowstone Network - Kristen Legg NPS I&M Rocky Mountain Network - Mike Britten Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee Whitebark Pine Subcommittee - Karl Buermeyer & Virginia Kelly Grand Teton National Park - Kelly McClosky Yellowstone National Park - Ann Rodman Rocky Mountain National Park - Ben Bobowski Eastern US NPS I&M Appalachian Highlands Network - Robert Emmott NPS I&M Eastern Rivers and Mountains Network - Matt Marshall NPS I&M Mid-Atlantic Network - Jim Comiskey Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area - Richard Evans & Leslie Morelock Great Smoky Mountains National Park - Jim Renfro Shenandoah National Park - Jim Schaberl Agency Collaborations

9 SYM 7 Wildland Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Pioneering Approaches to Science and Management in the US Northern Rockies and Appalachians A conceptual framework for linking climate science with management John Gross, NPS Exposure across the GNLCC and APLCC: Climate, land use, ecosystem process Forrest Melton, NASA Ames and CA State University Potential impacts of climate change on vegetation in the Appalachian LCC Patrick Jantz, Woods Hole Research Center Potential impact of climate change on vegetation in the Great Northern LCC Andy Hansen, Montana State University

10 Tree and shrub species habitat suitability across Greater Yellowstone under climate change Nathan Piekielek, Montana State University Climate change management evaluation and implementation, with a focus on whitebark pine Tom Olliff, Great Northern LCC Panel: Linking climate science and management discussion panel: Key opportunities and challenges in protected areas. Bill MonahanNPS (Moderator) Ben BobowskiRocky Mountain NP Dave HallacYellowstone NP Virginia KellyGreater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee Patrick JantzShenandoah National Park / Woods Hole SYM 7 Wildland Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Pioneering Approaches to Science and Management in the US Northern Rockies and Appalachians

11 - Reduce Exposure - Reduce Sensitivity - Increase Adaptive Capacity - Exposure - Sensitivity - Adaptive Capacity - Species - Ecosystem - Biomes - Policy - Practice - Institutional Changes 1. Identify Conservation Targets 1. Identify Conservation Targets 2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change 2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change 4. Implement Management Options 4. Implement Management Options 3. Identify Management Options 3. Identify Management Options Monitor, Review, Revise From: Stein and Glick 2011. Chapter 1. Introduction in Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A guide to climate change vulnerability assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC.

12 Revisit planning as needed Adjust actions as needed Re-assess vulnerability as needed 1. Identify conservation goals and objectives 2. Assess climate impacts and vulnerabilities 3. Review/revise conservation goals and objectives 4. Identify adaptation options 5. Evaluate and prioritize adaptation actions 6. Implement priority adaptation actions 7. Track action effectiveness and ecological responses Generalized Adaptation Framework Stein et al. 2014. Climate-Smart Conservation: Putting Adaptation Principles into Practice

13 13 Identify conservation targets What’s going to be different in the future? How does CC challenge existing goals? Which high priority resources should be the focus?

14 14 CC issues identified by collaborators : Access to existing and emerging knowledge Projections for dominant forest types and systems 5-needle pines (whitebark, limber pine) Cove forests, eastern spruce-fir, other hardwoods

15 15 Vulnerability Potential Impact Adaptive Capacity ExposureSensitivity What’s at risk and why?

16 Assessing Vulnerability Exposure of US National Parks to Land Use and Climate Change 1900-2100 Hansen et al. 2014 Ecological Applications 1. Define the surrounding Protected Area Centered Ecosystem (PACE; Hansen et al. 2011). 2.Quantify past exposure. 1900-2010 Vulnerability Potential Impact Adaptive Capacity Exposure Sensitivity Land Use Change Climate Change Invasive Species

17 1900-2000

18 Assessing Vulnerability Exposure of US National Parks to Land Use and Climate Change 1900-2100 Hansen et al. 2014 Ecological Applications 1. Define the surrounding Protected Area Centered Ecosystem (PACE; Hansen et al. 2011). 2. Quantify past exposure. 3. Quantify potential future exposure and potential impact. 4. Consider implications for management. 2010-2100 Vulnerability Potential Impact Adaptive Capacity Exposure Sensitivity Land Use Change Climate Change Potential Biome Type

19 19 Ecological Forecasting

20 Multi-scale assessment of vulnerability SpeciesEcological SystemLCC-Scale ExposureCC Projections; TOPS variables CC Projections; TOPS variables CC Projections; TOPS variables SensitivitySDMs; Life history traits Climate variation; LPJ modeling Biome BGC responses; NPP controls Adaptive Capacity Species & habitat traits; Life history traits Connectivity; Refugia; Topography ES diversity; Connectivity; Land forms 20

21 21 Informing Resource Management Decision Collaboration with GYCC WBP Subcommittee Whitebark pine VA feeds into adaptation process Use forecasts to evaluate current strategy Identify new options based on forecasts and potential responses

22 22 Questions? Comprehensive framework for adaptation Applying multi-scale, state-of-the-art science to resource management Expect end-to-end accomplishments


Download ppt "1 A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management Climate Change Response ProgramNational Park Service July 14, 2014 SCB, Missoula,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google