Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

FAULT PROGNOSIS USING DYNAMIC WAVELET NEURAL NETWORKS P. Wang G. Vachtsevanos Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "FAULT PROGNOSIS USING DYNAMIC WAVELET NEURAL NETWORKS P. Wang G. Vachtsevanos Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332"— Presentation transcript:

1 FAULT PROGNOSIS USING DYNAMIC WAVELET NEURAL NETWORKS P. Wang G. Vachtsevanos Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 email: gjv@ee.gatech.edu AAAI 1999 Spring Symposium March 22-24, 1999

2 The ONR CBM Program Objective: Design, build and test an integrated hardware/software system for machinery diagnostics/prognostics The Testbed: A shipboard industrial chiller The Team: Honeywell Technology Center Predict DLI Georgia Tech NRL

3 The D/P/CBM Architecture System Time to Perform Maintenance FMEA Diagnostics Prognostics CBM Alarms

4

5

6 Diagnostics Determine accurately and without false alarms impending or incipient failure conditions

7 A Two-Prong Approach High-frequency failure modes (vibrations, etc.): The Wavelet Neural Net Approach Low-frequency events (Temperature, Pressure, etc.): The Fuzzy Logic Approach The Diagnostic Module

8 Failure Templates Fuzzify FeaturesInference Engine Fuzzy Rule Base (1) If symptom A is high & symptom B is low then failure mode is F1 (2)... (Defuzzify) Failure Mode Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Sensor DataFeatures

9 Wavelet Neural Network (WNN)

10 0 1 1 0 Wavelet Neural Network Competition Wavelet Neural Network Based Fault Classification Signal Feature Extraction Result + - Actual Fault Signature

11 Collect DataPreprocess data Extract Features & Prepare Training Data P 1 - peak of original signal P 2 - peak of its spectrum T - Fault Types C - Binary code of T P 1 P 2 C T 0.4 0.2 00 Normal 4.6 0.4 01 Vibrometer bias 0.7 4.0 10 Strong Noise 3.8 7.6 11 Bearing Crack.... P1P1 P2P2 C1C1 C2C2 Train WNN Input Data Preprocess Data Extract Features & Form Feature Vector WNN Result Off-line Learning On-line Implementation

12

13 Prognostics Objective –Determine time window over which maintenance must be performed without compromising the system’s operational integrity

14 The Prognosticator!

15 A Prognostic System

16 On Virtual Sensors Many failure modes are difficult or impossible to monitor Question: How do we build a “fault meter”? Answer: Virtual Sensor The Notion: Use available sensor data to map known measurements to a “fault measurement” Potential Problem Areas: How do we train the neural net? Laboratory or controlled experiments required

17 An Example (Ford Motor Co.) Engine Combustion Failures -- Misfire Detection Solution: Misfires may be discerned by detecting “acceleration deficits” Dynamic (Recurrent) Neural Net Crankshaft Acceleration Engine Speed Engine Load Misfire “Meter”...

18 Virtual Sensor

19 Process Demonstrator

20 An Experimental Setup

21

22 Width Depth

23 ON THE ISSUE OF UNCERTAINTY  SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY  UNCERTAINTY REPRESENTATION  UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT  ONE-STEP VS. K-STEP PREDICTION  CRITICAL CONCERNS ARISING IN FAILURE PROGNOSIS

24 Uncertainty boundaries in a prognostic task

25 Prediction of a distribution curve

26 Prognosticator using a fuzzy virtual sensor (Confidence) Interval DWNN

27 PREDICTION OF THE EVOLUTION OF A FAILURE AND ESTIMATION OF THE CONFIDENCE LIMIT UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT: SHRINK CONFIDENCE LIMITS

28 PREDICTION OF EVOLUTION OF FAILURE

29 Prediction models for sequence prediction (a) series-parallel model (b) parallel model

30 CONFIDENCE LIMITS USING RBFN OR WNN BASED PROGNOSTICATORS IF THE 95% CERTAINTY LIMIT FOR THE EXPECTED RESIDUAL VALUE ASSOCIATED WITH THE OUTPUT OF UNIT h IS: where t represents the student t-distribution and s is the local estimate of variance then: (Leonard, et al)

31 A POSSIBLE APPROACH TO SEQUENCE PREDICTION AND CALCULATION OF CONFIDENCE LIMITS

32 Current Research Thrusts Prognostics Uncertainty Management - Source of Uncertainty - Representation of Uncertainty - Uncertainty Management Learning/Adaptation Sensor Fusion

33 Issues and Concerns Large-grain uncertainty Lack of reliable failure models / failure growth prediction System-specific and operational-dependent conditions Incomplete and inadequate data sources Instrumentation and processing requirements Ability to deal effectively with multiple sensors / sensor fusion techniques Reliable, cost-effective, and efficient hardware platforms that can facilitate a parallel processing and multi-tasking environment

34 Conditioned-Based Maintenance Objective –Determine the “optimum” time to perform maintenance Problem Definition –A scheduling problem - schedule maintenance timing to meet specified objective criteria under certain constraints

35 Condition-Based Maintenance Major Objective –Extend system life cycle as much as possible without endangering its integrity Enabling Technologies –Various Optimization Tools –Genetic Algorithms –Evolutionary Computing


Download ppt "FAULT PROGNOSIS USING DYNAMIC WAVELET NEURAL NETWORKS P. Wang G. Vachtsevanos Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google