1. GRAMIS

2. Johan van der Auwera Antwerpen Liesbeth Degand Louvain-la-Neuve

10. Grammaticalization

11. He sings well. He might as well be home. well. well Grammaticalization

12. He sings well.well. MANNER ADVERB MODAL MARKER Grammaticalization He might as well be home.well

13. He sings well.well. MANNER ADVERB MODAL MARKER Grammaticalization Subjectification He might as well be home.well

14. He sings well.well. MANNER ADVERB MODAL MARKER Well, he is home now.Well, Grammaticalization Subjectification He might as well be home.well

15. Grammaticalization He sings well.well. MANNER ADVERB MODAL MARKER Subjectification Well, he is home now.Well, DISCOURSE MARKER He might as well be home.well

16. Grammaticalization He sings well.well. MANNER ADVERB MODAL MARKER Subjectification Well, he is home now.Well, DISCOURSE MARKER Intersubjectification He might as well be home.well

17. 20112007

18. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007

19. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 WP 1 - Modality ‘Jespersen cycle’ne …. ne pas …. pas van der Auwera, J. (2009) ‘The Jespersen cycles’, In: E. Van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change, 35–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins. van der Auwera, J. (2010) ‘On the diachrony of negation’, In: L. R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Devos, M., Kasombo Tshibanda, M. & van der Auwera, J. (in print) ‘Jespersen cycles in Kanincin: Double, triple and maybe even quadruple negation’, Africana Linguistica Devos, M. & van der Auwera, J. (under revision) ‘Jespersen cycles in Bantu: Double and triple negation’ Conference presentations in Tervuren, Berkeley, Caen, Berlin, Manchester, Osaka

20. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 WP 4 - Discourse New Reflections on Grammaticalization in Leuven, 2008 B.Cornillie, H. Cuyckens & T. Mortelmans L. Degand & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, a workshop called ‘Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization and/or (Inter)Subjectification: Methodological issues for the study of discourse markers’. L. Degand & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen Joint paper, separate papers G. Diewald Paper Now in print in Linguistics

21. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens

23. A Leuven

24. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Brems, L. 2007 The synchronic layering of size noun and type noun constructions in English.

25. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve

26. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German including modal ones Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve Leuven Antwerpen

28. A A Leuven A Gent

29. 2008 2011 … 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 20072007 English complementation Leuven - Cuyckens English NP Leuven - Davidse Discourse particles in English, French, Dutch & German including modal ones Gent Hannover Louvain-la-Neuve Leuven Antwerpen Modality Gent Leuven Antwerpen

31. A A Leuven A Gent

32. WP1: Modality WP2: Evidentiality WP3: Mood WP4: Discourse WP5: Complementation WP6:Nominal modification WP7: Theoretical implications Polarity Argument structure Scalarity, indefiniteness

33. WP1: Modality WP2: Evidentiality WP3: Mood WP4: Discourse WP5: Complementation WP6:Nominal modification WP7: Theoretical implications Polarity Argument structure Scalarity, indefiniteness

34. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses

35. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues:

36. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification

37. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization - Subjectification ?

38. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification Grammaticalization - (Inter)subjectification ?

39. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification (De)grammaticalization - (Inter)subjectification - Pragmaticalization?

40. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification (De)grammaticalization - (Inter)subjectification - (De)pragmaticalization?

41. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification (De)grammaticalization - (Inter)subjectification - (De)pragmaticalization - Analogical change?

42. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification (De)grammaticalization - (Inter)subjectification - (De)pragmaticalization - Analogical change? - Desubjectification - De-intersubjectification?

43. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW?

44. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ① Already partial answers

45. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ① Already partial answers Degand, L. Diewald, G. ‘Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions’, Linguistics

46. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ② International conference on Nov 11-13 2010

48. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ③ Projects in preparation

49. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? ③ Projects in preparation Nuyts, J. & P. Byloo Modal and other qualifications in language and thought. The Dutch modals and (inter)subjectification.

50. WP7: Theoretical implications 2+ years’ worth of relatively specific data and hypotheses now need to be made more relevant for general issues: Grammaticalization Subjectification Intersubjectification HOW? BUT 2016