Download presentation
1
COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MPA503
C P A MODELS
2
SUMMARY/RECAP C P A ISSUES EMERGENCE LINKAGE WITH US AID
SMALL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY THEORIES/RESEARCH VESTED INTERESTS OSSSIFICATION
3
RIGGS MODEL ECOLOGICAL APPROACH STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL APPROACH
IDEAL MODELS ( MODEL BUILDING)
4
RIGGS MODEL ECOLOGICAL APPROACH
DYNAMICS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM ND ITS ENVIRONMENT COMPRISING POLITICAL SOCIAL, CULTURAL & ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM IS ONE OF THE MANY SUBSYSTEMS IN SOCIETY WHICH INFLUENCE EACH OTHER (J.M.GAUS 1947,ROBERT A DAHL 1947 ROSCOE MARTIN 1952 & FRED W RIGGS 1961)
5
RIGGS MODEL STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL APPROACH EVERY SOCIETY HAS STRUCTURES WHICH PERFORM SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS PRIMARILY POLITICAL ECONOMIC SOCIAL SYMBOLIC(MOSQUE) COMMUNICATIONAL(MEDIA) THE ABOVE SET OF FUNCTIONAL REQUISITES APPLY TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUB-SYSTEM
6
RIGGS MODEL AGRARIA INDUSTRIA MODEL(1956)
SOCIETIES DOMINATED BY AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETIES DOMINATED BY INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONS ALL SOCIETIES MOVE FROM AGRARIA STAGE TO INDUSTRIA STAGE IDENTIFIED STRUCTURED FEATURES OF AGRAIAN AND INDUSTRIALISED SOCIETIES INTERMEDIATE TRANSITA MODEL
7
RIGGS MODELS CRITICISM
NOT SUFFICIENT FOCUS ON TRANSITIONAL SOCIETIES OR MIXED TYPE SOCIETIES ASSUMES UNIDIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT FROM AGRARIA TO INDUSTRIA STAGE MORE EMPHASIS ON ENVIRONMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM RATHER THAN THE SYSTEM ITSELF IT IS TOO ABSTRACT AND REMOVED FROM REALITY
8
FEATURES OF AGRARIA AND INDUSTRIA
Ascriptive values Achievement values Particularistic norms Universalistic norms Diffuse patterns Specific patterns
9
Features of Agraria and Industria
Stable local groups and limited spatial mobility High degree of social and spatial mobility Simple and stable occupational differentiation Well developed occupational system Deferential stratification system Egalitarian class system Prevalence of associations which are functionally specific and non-ascriptive
10
Features of Agraria and Industria
Deferential stratification system Egalitarian class system Prevalence of associations which are functionally specific and non-ascriptive
11
Attributes of Fused, Prismatic and Diffracted Societies
Ascription Attainment Achievement Particularism Selectivism Universalim Functional diffusion Poly-functionalism Functional specificity
12
RIGGS MODEL FUSED-PRISMATIC-DIFFRACTED MODEL
REPRESENTS UDERDEVELOPED, DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED SOCIETIES TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES RELATE TO FUSED MODEL (FUNCTIONALLY DIFFUSED) WHEREAS MODERN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES RELATE TO THE REFRACTED MODEL (FUNCTIONALLY SPECIFIC) BETWEEN THE TWO LIES THE PRISMATIC MODEL
13
RIGGS MODELS IN A FUSED SOCIETY A GIVEN STRUCTURE PERFORMS MANY FUNCTIONS IN A DIFFRACTED SOCIETY EACH STRUCTURE PERFORMS LIMITED FUNCTIONS IN THE MIDDLE LIES THE TRANSITIONAL PRISMATIC SOCIETY BETWEEN THE UNDIFFERENTIATED FUSED SOCIETY AND A HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED DIFFRACTED SOCIETY
14
RIGGS MODELS PRISMATIC –SALA MODEL
PRISMATIC REPRESENTSTHE TRANSITIONAL/DEVELOPING SOCIETY SALA REPRESENTS THEADMINISTRATIVE SUB-SYSTEM OF THE SOCIETY
15
RIGGS MODELS FEATURES OF PRISMATIC-SALA MODEL
HETEROGENEITY:SIMULTANEOUS PRESENCE OF SYSTEMS, PRACTICES AND VIEWPOINTS FORMALISM: HUGE GAP BETWEEN THE FORMALLY PRESCRIBED AND ACTUAL PRACTICE OVERLAPPINGDIFFERENTIATED AND UNDIFFERENTIATED STRUUCTURES COEXIST,ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR DOMINATED BY NON ADMINISTRATIVE CRITERIA NEPOTISM IN RECRUITMENT POLYNORMATIVISM & POLYCOMMUNALISM
16
RIGGS MODELS BAZAAR—CANTEEN MODEL
THE ECONOMIC SUBSYSTEM OF A PRISMATIC SOCIETY HAS BEEN TERMED BY RIGGS AS THE BAZAAR—CANTTEEN MODEL COMBINING THE MARKET ECONOMY OF A DIFFRACTED SOCIETY AND TRADITIONAL ECONOMY OF FUSED SOCIETY PRODUCING PRICE INDETERMINANCY OR FLUCTUATIONS AUTHORITY IS HIGHLY CENTRALISED AND CONCENTRATED WHEREAS CONTOL SYSTEM IS LOCALISED AND DISPERSED RESULTING IN AN UNBALANCED POLITY
17
RIGGS MODEL REVISED PRISMATIC MODEL
DIFFERENTIATION; ONE - DIMENSIONAL APPROACH DIFFERENTIATION & INTEGRATION : TWO – DIMENSIONAL APPROACH
18
RIGGS MODELS CHANGE IN A PRISMATIC SOCIETY
PACE OF DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO CHANGE (WESTERN SOCIETIES ADJUSTED TO CHANGE DUE TO LONG TIME SPAN OF DEVELOPMENT) LESS HETEROGENEITY,FORMALISM AND OVERLAPPING THAN THE DEVELOPING(TRANSITIONAL) SOCIETIES EXTERNAL(EXO GENOUS) & INTERNAL(ENDO GENOUS) PRESSURE FOR CHANGE AND EQUI-GENETIC CHANGE
19
RIGGS MODELS DIFFRACTED AND PRISMATIC SOCIETAL MODELS SUBDIVIDED ON BASIS OF DEGREE OF INTEGRATION DIFFRACTED SUB- DIVIDED INTO EO-DIFFRACTED, ORTHO-DIFFRACTED AND NEO- DIFFRACTED PRISMATIC SOCIETIES SUBDIVIDED INTO EO-PRISMATIC,ORTHO-PRISMATIC AND NEO-PRISMATIC
20
ROBERT DAHLS CONTRIBUTION
ADMINISTRATIVE GENERALISATIONS NOT APPLICABLE UNIVERSALITY ONLY POSSIBLE IF EMPIRICALLY TESTED IN VARIOUS SETTINGS SHOULD BE TRULY INERDISCIPLINARY TO BE SCIENTIFIC AND RELEVANT TO ALL SOCIETIES STUDY OF PEOPLE CAN ONLY ENSURE VITAL TO ENSURE PUBLIC COOPERATION
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.