1. Group 5 Jason Lin Jason Lin Brent Tam Susan Tong Neel Punatar Ozgun Karabal Troy Ballesteros Adetama Hendrasto

2. Overview IDEO Inspired Design Process IDEO Inspired Design Process Top 3 Designs Top 3 Designs User Survey Results and Analysis User Survey Results and Analysis Top Design Top Design Careers and Potential Employers Careers and Potential Employers Curriculum Curriculum Pros and Cons Pros and Cons Website Presentation Website Presentation

3. IDEO Inspired Process 1. Defining User Types User Types Potential StudentsFacultyIndustry High School, Community College, Undeclared COE Professors, Lecturers, GSIs Engineering Firms Design Firms Tech Companies

4. 2. Brainstorming 2. Brainstorming Quantity Building Off Each Other’s Idea Radical Ideas Encouraged

5. 3. Research Then we narrowed down our ideas…

6. Best Designs Conservative Technical Communications Engineering Moderate Prototype Engineering & IP Studies Radical Athletic Engineering

7. This major sounds fun and interesting. Student Surveys PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 102

8. I am willing to pursue this major. Student Surveys PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 102

9. Academic Faculty Surveys I am willing to teach a course in this major? PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 21

10. Academic Faculty Surveys How useful do you feel is this major? PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 21

11. Industry Surveys Would your company hire graduates of this major? PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 14

12. Industry Surveys Which major would best satisfy skills lacking in current graduates? PEIPSTCEAE Sample Size: 14

13. Decision Process Based on Feedback Based on Feedback –AE generated more high school student interest –PEIPS more interest from undergraduates and community college students –Industry professionals found PEIPS graduates most fitting in R&D departments –Industry found need for better communication skills in college graduates We chose…

15. Prototype Engineering Design Design –User Interface –Experience –Product Tools Tools –CAD –Simulation –Modeling

16. Intellectual Property Studies Exposure to patent law Exposure to patent law –To understand patent process and regulations –Learn to modify ideas to create legally “new” ideas

17. Design Process Process Process –Problem Definition –Brainstorming –Prototype Building –Product Testing through Usability –Statistical Analysis –Modifications –Creation of final product –Patenting of product

18. PEIPS at Freshman Year Curriculum Freshman Year Curriculum Freshman Fall Math 1A Calculus4 Physics 7AIntro. To Statics and motions 4 Chemistry 1AIntroduction to Chemistry 4 HumanitiesSuggested: English 1A (List E) 3 Total 15 Math 1B Calculus4 Physics 7BElectricity and Magnetism 4 Eng. 45Material Science 3 E28CAD Design3 PEIPS 1Seminar – Intro to PEIPS 1 Total: 15 Sophomore Fall FallSpring

19. Sophomore Year Curriculum Math 53 Multivariable Calculus 4 Eng. 77Programming3 IEOR 170Design3 Legal Studies 100 Introduction to Law 4 Total: 14 Math 54 Linear Algebra 4 Engineering 36 Statics2 PE 100Rapid Prototyping 2 EECS 40Introduction to Circuit Design 4 Bolt 275Introduction to Patent Law 3 Total: 15 FallSpring

20. Junior Year Curriculum Junior Fall Option 1 3 CE 130Mechanics of Materials 3 ME 104Dynamics3 EECS 143Micro Fabrication Lab 4 Bolt 277Patent law3 Total: 16 Option 2 Ind Eng 130Modeling and Simulation 3 ME 128Advanced CAD3 E 128Advanced CAD3 PEIPS 180 Molding Lab3 Psychology 2 Intro to Psychology 3 Bolt 278.65Internationa l IP 3 ME 130Planar Machinery 3 E 190Technical Communica tions 3 Total: 15 Fall Spring

21. Senior Year Curriculum Fall Spring

22. PEIPS at Double Major/Minor/Options Double Major/Minor/Options ABET/COE/U.C. Requirements ABET/COE/U.C. Requirements Department Collaboration Department Collaboration

23. Created Classes PEIPS 1 – Introduction to PEIPS PEIPS 100 – Rapid Prototyping PEIPS 180 – Molding Lab PEIPS 189 – Experience and Interface Design PEIPS 191 – Loophole Prototype Designs

24. Careers Prototype Engineer Prototype Engineer Design Engineer Design Engineer Patent Examiner Patent Examiner Patent Attorney Patent Attorney

25. Potential Employers

26. Pros and Cons Meets surveyed need in industry Meets surveyed need in industry Flexibility to pursue patent law Flexibility to pursue patent law Uses many existing classes Uses many existing classes  Law may not appeal to engineers  Difficult to complete in 4 years  Hard to collaborate departments