2. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 What are digital libraries? Variety of perspectives and models Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and Library Studies Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey, U.S.A. tefko@scils.rutgers.edu http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko

3. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 2 On the scene F Several different communities involved in digital libraries, each with quite different  concepts, emphasis, approach, agenda F Many disciplines, institutions involved  national & global interest F Large research projects - U.S. & abroad F Many libraries investing & changing - hugely F Very high significance for the future of libraries & library & information professionals

4. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 3 Basic problems addressed F Creating means & ways for dealing with & using human knowledge records in the new digitalized AND networked world  How to deal with electronic “books”, journals, publications, texts, images, sounds,? u create, organize, represent, store, interact, preserve?  What access & services to provide?  How to effect use? Communities?  AND all in a networked environment?

5. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 4 Problems... F Problems are  technical, organizational, operational  managerial, institutional  social, legal, economic, cultural … F Creating a new world for libraries and for organization, access, preservation & use of human knowledge records in all formats F Digital revolution may be as far reaching as that created by Gutenberg & the printed book

6. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 5 What is a DIGITAL LIBRARY? F No single, all-encompassing answer F Several perspectives  from different communities - different agendas F Little communication among them F Coherent, integrating concept, approach not yet emerged F Complex problems in any approach  Many experiments; many experts & “experts” F Highly exiting & volatile area

7. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 6 Major (but only) perspectives F Two major conceptualizations stressing: 1. distributed objects in various forms, distributed access, representation, operability (computer science) 2. institution, collection, services, availability (libraries) F First is research perspective u focus on a range of research problems, with little or no operations; “D-lib” very broadly interpreted F Second is library operational perspective u focus on practical problems of transforming library institutions and services, with little or no research; “D-lib” very specifically interpreted

8. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 7 Research perspective "Digital libraries are organized collections of digital information. They combine the structuring and gathering of information, which libraries and archives have always done, with the digital representation that computers have made possible.” Lesk, 1997 “Digital library is a managed collection of information, with associated services, where information is stored in digital formats and accessible over a network.” Arms, 2000

9. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 8 Library perspective “Digital libraries are organizations that provide the resources, including the specialized staff, to select, structure, offer intellectual access to, interpret, distribute, preserve the integrity of, and ensure the persistence over time of collections of digital works so that they are readily and economically available for use by a defined community or set of communities.” Digital Libraries Federation (DLF)

10. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 9 Computer science, engineering F Concentrating on research & development F Technology centered  distributed & organized knowledge resources in electronic, digital formats u collect, store, organize, distribute, access, interact u diverse types of information –texts, images, sounds, multimedia in many areas  new kind of distributed database services to manage unstructured multimedia resources F Important for infrastructure

11. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 10 Examples of research areas F Interoperability between heterogeneous collections F Data integration - text, video, sound; metadata F Network protocols and standards F Search engines & agents for searching, filtering, navigating, summarizing, integration F Visualization & other interactive technology  browsing large volumes of texts & imagery; display F Scaling R&D to large collections, applications

12. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 11 Libraries and information science F Concentrates on institutions, service, practice  logical extension of libraries F Content, collection centered  Creation of digital collections - variety of forms  Subscription, licensing, sharing of digital resources  Organization, representation, storing  Access to collections F Guided by service mission u various environments, user communities u various degrees of integration - hybrid libraries

13. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 12 Examples of operational projects F Large number in the U.S. - various institutions - e.g.:  National Digital Library of the Library of Congress u “provide the widest possible access to knowledge & information for educating a free society.” F Numerous projects in Europe - e.g.:  Library Working Group in Britain; publishers projects with National Libraries; Delos Working Group (Espirit);  ERCIM consortium of institutions F All have web pages & many links to projects

14. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 13 Digital libraries & organizations F Variety of organizations built digital libraries  scientific & technical societies  various fields, academic units  projects - institutions, consortia  government agencies, international organizations F Concentrate on applications & access  Availability of collections in different fields  New forms of publishing, housing & distribution  Generally aimed at services to their communities or perceived needs

15. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 14 Digital libraries & business F Offering various kinds of digital libraries, collections, services, information resources  concentrating on markets, opportunities, niches  library and non-library markets F Publishers & digital publications - BIG business  traditional publishers changing & new emerging  providing libraries with different arrangements u electronic licenses, subscription, storage, services u relations between libraries & publishers drastically changing  mix of new technology & new economics

16. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 15 Advantages: Why digital libraries? F Access: brings library to users  always available; better and wider delivery  many libraries now possible to use F Sharing: information resources; linking F Timeliness: easier to keep current F Searching, browsing: use of computer power F Information resources: new forms possible F Services: new & new forms possible F Costs: may save effort, money??

17. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 16 Problems for libraries F Integration between print and digital  mixing new digital technology with print, local with global; managing diverse resources - all difficult  economic trade-off decisions; new economic relations F Competition for scarce resources sharpening F Institutional, cultural & social adjustments not easy F Bridging the digital divide F Resistance, threats:  guerilla warfare within and nuclear annihilation without

18. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 17 Economic issues F Costs not insignificant - WHO PAYS?  Two traditions: old - users, new (“free”) - providers F Dilemma in library budgets  licensing of digital publications vs. subscriptions F Publishers’ economics for digital publications  approaches vary, not settled, even scared  even: who is a publisher? - lines blurring F Economics of digital libraries still up in the air  room for research & experimentation

19. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 18 Social issues F Legal issues: copyright protection, security F Individual: privacy protection; rights; obligations  role in information exchanges, work, needs; life... F Organizations: integration; changing structure F Traditional libraries: disappearing? changing? F Education: impact on all levels; integration F Computing & society: disparity between information rich & poor; digital divide; equity

20. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 19 General opportunities F Building digital collections of national importance from existing texts, documents, images  historical, educational, strategic, legislative … F Creating new digital documents & linking them F Cataloging Internet resources in own domain F Selecting digital resources from wherever & creating & maintaining linkages F Developing/adapting search engines & other management tools for digital collections

21. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 20 General opportunities … continued F Providing access to digital collections F Integrating digital & other library collections  incl. integration of OPACs & library management tools F Establishing services for digital libraries  online access & offline support  education & training of users, and librarians F Addressing social, legal, policy issues F Cooperative national & international ventures F Making libraries more central to needs & users

22. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 21 Conclusions “War is too important a matter to be left to the generals.” Georges Clemenceau F Digital libraries are too important to be left to any one discipline, any one agency F Why? Work on digital libraries is defining the future of handling of human knowledge records F Caught a lot of interest globally & politically F They are also redefining the role of libraries in society & the role of librarians & inf. specialists

23. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 22 Conclusions … continued F Digital libraries provide challenge & opportunity for cooperative & interdisciplinary ventures F Provide a GREAT opportunity for many institutions to participate in many ways  have room for smaller institutions & projects F Digital libraries will NOT replace libraries F But no matter what: libraries and information agencies cannot escape digital libraries, must change  so might as well actively join the movement

24. © Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 23