1. Eugénio Oliveira /2007 Methodologies for Scientific Research: An Introduction Responsible: Eugénio Oliveira Edition 2007/2008 Doctoral Programme in Telecommunications MAP-Tele

2. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Questions: Why are you doing a PhD? What do you hope to get out of a PhD? Better Question: What are you suppose to be able to do if you have a PhD? Eugénio Oliveira /2007

3. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Eugénio Oliveira /2007 Goal: To pass your Thesis exam ! Publish or Perish Do Not Forget: Examiners will find it difficult to fail you if your thesis is supported by publications in peer-reviewed journals and conferences demonstrate a critical, perceptive and a constructive analysis of the subject;

4. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Aims and expected outcomes The main goal : to assume a scientific attitude while dealing with technological-like problems. Eugénio Oliveira /2007

5. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Eugénio Oliveira /2007 Expected outcomes include: To make acquaintance with the Methods, Processes and best Practices associated to Scientific Research To adequately produce scientific papers and thesis following the accepted best practices for this kind of texts. to develop scientific meetings organization skills.

6. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives The word "SCIENCE" used NARROWLY. PhD students often reply that his ideas rely in some evidence, but not the kind of those backed by "science.“ The problem with this is that science is no more and no less than total sum of what we have learned about evaluating general empirical claims and their evidence. Eugénio Oliveira /2007

7. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives The word "SCIENCE" used NARROWLY. Eugénio Oliveira /2007 “asserting that there is no scientific evidence is the same as asserting that there is no good evidence.” Russell Turpin – University of Texas

8. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Leonardo da Vinci All sciences are vain and full of errors that are not born of Experience- Mother of all certainty- and that are not tested by experience…. Eugénio Oliveira /2007 “A scientist sees a phenomenon and ask “why?” and proceed to research the answer to the question. An engineer sees a practical problem and wants to know “how” to solve it and “how” to implement that solution, or “how” to do it better if a solution exists

9. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Eugénio Oliveira /2007 A scientist builds in order to learn, but an engineer learns in order to build” Dr. Leung Yee Hong, Australian Telecommunications Cooperative Research Centre

10. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives A PhD student should pursue his thesis work following Scientific methods and not just Project-oriented ones. Eugénio Oliveira /2007 A PhD Student has to develop and put in practice a systhematic scientific criticism over all the subjects Unlike scientific research, engineering research must address following question: Is “this” problem a significant problem? That is, why should we solve it?

11. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 Objectives Eugénio Oliveira /2007 A PhD Student has to demonstrate the ability to produce different kinds of scientific texts in the right format, besides its intrinsic good quality

12. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 WEB Web site for this “Methodology for Scientific Research” course is available: http://paginas.fe.up.pt/~eol/MEMBERS/eco_i.html Eugénio Oliveira /2007

13. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 PROGRAMME 1- Methods and Techniques for developing Research projects -Basic Motivations: Issues on Scientific Methods - Supporting Theories - Positivist (classical) Research methods - Interpretative Research method - Research in Engineering disciplines - Techniques associated to Research: Eugénio Oliveira /2007

14. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 PROGRAMME Non-empirical Positivist “Borderline” techniques Engineering-based (constructive, de-constructive) -Quality of Research - Challenges Eugénio Oliveira /2007

15. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 PROGRAMME Eugénio Oliveira /2007 2. How to conceive and produce useful publications: for Conferences, Journals and Theses Preparation, Motivation, Structure, Contents, Conclusions and impact How to write a readable paper: guidelines

16. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 PROGRAMME 3. How to get good competences for searching Scientific & Technique written texts Information Retrieval from specific Data Bases By Drª Ana Azevedo, Librarian at FEUP Eugénio Oliveira /2007 4. Selecting typical papers for reviewing 5. Final workshop producing papers “Scientific” Programme Organization Papers Evaluation Oral Communications

17. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 TEACHING METHODS Attending and interacting during classes. Review of selected scientific papers (both good and bad) Students are asked for producing papers’ reviewing (in pairs) Organizing an internal workshop, including: -- Production of papers in the appropriate format -- Paper reviewing and reviews collecting through software tools -- Paper presentation at the Workshop Students are asked to meet together for the workshop organization. Eugénio Oliveira /2007

18. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 GRADING INFORMATION: Up to 35% for attending and participating during classes including papers reviewing Up to 65% for the submitted paper and oral presentation at the workshop Eugénio Oliveira /2007 DATES 04/01 Selecting typical papers for reviewing 11/01 Presentation of the reviewing work done Choosing a specific subject for writing individual paper 18/01Workshop Scientific Committe meeting 25/01Oral presentation at the internal workshop (? Or later?)

19. Eugénio Oliveira /2006 SCIENCE Science never is completely right. However, it rarely is totally wrong. In general, science has a higher probability of beeing correct than the non-scientific theorie. That is why it is rational to accept scientific explanation as an hipothesis. Bertrand Russel My philosophical development Eugénio Oliveira /2007 “Science distinguishes FACTS from the interpretation of those facts Through PROPOSITIONS” Alan Sokal