1. First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review

2. Graduate Mission Superior Graduate Study Options Quality of Enrollment Advanced Scholarship through Assessment Rigorous Courses & Options Student Scholarship Faculty Scholarship

3. Criterion 1: Sustained Achievements Attracting Quality Candidates Enrollment Management  Recruitment Plan  Selection Criteria  Acceptance Rate Assistantship/Scholarship Management  Annual Awards  Competitive Awards Matriculation Management Graduate Placement

4. Criterion 2 Sustained Achievements Fostering Scholarship Assessment Results Center for Academic Support & Achievement  Written & Oral Communication  Depth of Knowledge (Technology & Ethics)  Critical Thinking & Problem Solving  Research & Scholarship Assessment Results Graduate School

5. Criterion 3 Rigorous Courses and Options Sustained Mission Planning Sustained Curricular Leadership  Administration Contributions to Quality  Faculty Contributions to Quality External Review Contributions to Quality Capstone Contributions to Quality Student Contributions to Quality Alumni Contributions to Quality External Partnership Contributions To Quality

6. Criterion 4 Sustained Student Research/Creative Activities Sustained Student Research  Productivity  Engagement Commitment to Research & Travel Grants Showcasing Scholarship Award Participation

7. Criterion 5 Sustained Faculty Scholarship Coordinator Leadership Faculty Scholarship

8. What is a Consultation? Informal Summary Documenting Criteria Informal Presentation to Review Board Only Guidance for a Decision about a Full Review Identification of Criteria that Appear to be Met Identification of Criteria that Appear not to be Met

9. How Does it Start? Chair Collaborates with Coordinator: Makes decision to apply Chair & Coordinator Select Program Team, Team Leader, Team Consultants (if desired) Chair or Coordinator Request a Consultation Date

10. Guidelines for the Consultation Report Not Required in Advance Informal without Format Expectations

11. Outcome Following a Consultation Dean Provides a Formal Summary of Strengths/Weaknesses via the CGS Board’s Review in 30 Days Meeting with Dean to Review Report Program Communicates Decision for Pursuing Full Review

12. What is a Full Review? Comprehensive Evaluation of a Program Formal Report with Format Expectations Report Required 30 Days in Advance Presentation to Entire CGS CGS Provides Feedback to Review Board Board Makes Recommendation to Dean Formal Report and Decision

13. What is Included in a Full Review Report? Program Mission Program Degree Requirements Program Admission Requirements Other Essential Elements Documentation of How Criteria Met/Sustained Highlights of Exemplary Achievements

14. How is a Full Review Conducted? Documents Reviewed by CGS & CGS Board Formal Presentation to CGS by Program Team Program Team Discussion with CGS CGS Board Discussion with CGS Recommendation by CGS Board to Dean Decision by Dean

15. What is the Outcome of a Full Review Program Achieves or Does Not Achieve the First Choice Designation Review Board Provides Dean with Summary Report Dean Completes Formal Report for Program If Achieved, Resources Follow If Not Achieved, Meetings Held to Review Needs

16. AQIGP: Academic Quality Improvement for Graduate Programs Selection Process Consultation Process Report

17. Suspending Enrollments Enrollment Limitations Assessment Limitations Curriculum Limitations Student Research/Creative Activity Limitations Faculty Scholarship Limitations

18. Discussion Q & A