Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
WG 3: Impact assessment ► 9 members – good discussions ► Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle ?? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
2
WG 3 – Impacts and assessment area ► Impacts adverse effects on ecosystems and humans induced by xenobiotics ► Assessment area – urban water wastewater ► municipal ► industrial? ► hospital? stormwater surface water groundwater drinking water ”recreational” water ► bathing water recycling water ► ”who” is impacted? who is hit (target/non-target) COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
3
Xenobiotics? Man-made chemicals or materials not produced in nature and not normally considered a constituent component of a specified biological system. The term is usually applied to manufactured chemicals. (Van Leeuwen & Hermens, 1995) COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
4
WG 3 – xenobiotics ► Xenobiotics covered by WG3 man-made chemicals in ”forms” or amounts not normally found in nature ► xenobiotic organic compounds ► heavy metals strong urban source ► input FROM urban areas WG1 ► background concentrations.... ► Chemicals grouping/tracers (use, chemical structure, distribution) matrix WG 1 (source) priority pollutants (e.g. WFD) COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
5
WFD in WG 3 ► the legal frame but not scientific ► retrospective... not proactive ► toolbox-development ► stakeholders as driving force ► groundwater – surface water interaction ► ecotoxicological status vs ecological status ► threshold limit values across Europe COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 WFD WG3 37
6
Long-term objective for WG3 ► Conceptual framework for impact assessment for xenobitics in the urban water cycle ► Biotests as analytical tool ► Are we measuring the right thing? Common research project... Marie Curie proposal... COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
7
Action plan 2006-2008 ► Plan for 2006 Meeting in March/April 2006 – in Luxembourg (??) WG3 in Freiburg in Oct 2006 (only WG3!!) ► Activities 2007 & 2008 Themes – 2 meeting/yr Conceptual framework – building blocks ► Activities between meetings Before 1 st meeting: Background papers ► what’s the status of applying biotests for impact assessment around Europe (and North America) (draft by Zita Vosyliené) ► state-of-the-art for complex mixture assessment (Sureyya Meric) ► impact assessment relation to WFD (Verena Höckele) ► overview of the ”impact assessment” expertises within the group – 3-4 lines of expertises, key publication, test methods available, ongoing project (Anders Baun provide outline, collects input, write intro) Identification opportunities for exchange of human resources Identification of common topics for training courses COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
8
Themes in 2006 1 st meeting Impact thresholds in the environment & humans methods from molecular level whole organisms ecosystem which methods exist? state-of-the-art what do they tell us? do we really use the appropriate methods to evaluate the impacts we are interested in do we have the methods for this? do we have the relevant expertises represented in WG3 going beyond what we take for granted... ways of evaluating results (e.g. statistical significance) link to WFD? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
9
Themes in 2006 2 nd meeting Complex composition – how is dealt with in different countries? Impact of the whole sample is the only relevant thing...!? WET – whole effluent testing – not only xenobiotics give rise to adverse effects Chem. anal. vs effects TIE – Toxicity Identification Evaluation ► Groupwise fractionation techiques ► Source tracking – gaining knowledge about composition Treatment efficiency – tox before and after cleaning WG2 Concentrations – continous discharge vs. intermittent discharges COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
10
2007-2008 WG 3 – list of ”discussion words” ► Bioavailability – exposure concentration chemical vs biological methods ► By-products, degradation products, metabolites ► Existing bioassays for monitoring discharges – WFD ► Human toxicology – drinking water issues ► Water vs sediments ► Risk management ► Urban area – defined by space or activities? ► Test batteries ► Ring testing – biological and chemical... not in WG3 ► Sinks – long-term vs. short-term storage WG1 dynamics ► Training courses/schools QA/QC ► Particles ► Scales average human vs. ecosystem (”½ pregnant woman”) dilution does the tests/chem analyses make sense? ► site specific vs. generic ► spatial ► temporal ► extrapolation ► uncertainty ► How to select chemicals? task force with members from WG1-4 largest possible list? national lists of PP ► How to choose methods? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off meeting DTU 7-9 Sept. 2005 37
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.