Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

11 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 AREVA Views on Infrastructure Assessment Andrew Teller Senior Reactor Marketing Advisor AREVA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "11 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 AREVA Views on Infrastructure Assessment Andrew Teller Senior Reactor Marketing Advisor AREVA."— Presentation transcript:

1 11 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 AREVA Views on Infrastructure Assessment Andrew Teller Senior Reactor Marketing Advisor AREVA andrew.teller@areva.com

2 22 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 General Statement AREVA welcomes this initiative aiming to facilitate the orderly access to peaceful nuclear energy by countries with no or little previous experience in this area

3 33 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 Some Additional Comments  Milestones Document NG-G-3.1 proceeds in the IAEA’s typical way: very thorough and systematic  AREVA remains at the disposal of prospective customers to provide information enabling them to progress to the status of knowledgeable customer  Many actions referred to in NG-G-3.1 are to be documented in a report  These report chart the roadmap leading to the status of knowledgeable nuclear operator (milestone 3)  Especially for phase 1, stating the problem in terms of deliverables can help the journey towards reaching phase3

4 44 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 Proposed deliverables of phase 1  Policy document explaining reasons for choosing nuclear energy as part of the country’s energy mix  Document(s)  identifying all the necessary actions to be undertaken by the candidate country to reach phase 3  quantifying the efforts required by these actions  confirming the country’s commitment to undertake the said actions and providing details on route to be followed

5 55 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 Desired status prior to answering an Invitation to Tender (phase 2)  Signature of the International legal instruments governing nuclear activities (see list of Conventions in §5.1 of document NG-T-3.2)  Evidence of phase 1 having been achieved (see above-mentioned deliverables), including  Presence of a national, independent, Nuclear Safety Organization  Human resources development under way  Financial background to potential contract such that credit insurance can be obtained

6 66 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 The Particular Case of Export Control AREVA would expect the government of the importing country to institute a legislative framework requiring its companies to implement an Internal Compliance Programme (ICP) This ICP implies for each company concerned:  Compiling a comprehensive set of policies and procedures for the staff in charge of international procurement  Nominating an Export Control Officer supervising the import operations of the company  Implementing a suitable education programme for its staff  Instituting internal audits (to be performed by a body independent from international procurement) to verify actual compliance with the policies and procedures adopted

7 77 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 Note on Human Resources Development  Although the problem might be more acute for new entrants, having skilled staff in sufficient numbers is a concern for every country in the current context of the Nuclear Renaissance  New entrants must bear in mind that they will not need only Ph Ds in nuclear engineering:  workers skilled in mechanics, electricity, welding, etc. are also important and likely to be in short supply

8 88 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 Concluding remarks  AREVA is happy to take the IAEA Milestones methodology as the basis for assessing the “nuclear-worthiness” of potential customers  AREVA would appreciate some form of confirmation by the IAEA, as a neutral organization mustering the necessary expertise, that a given country has made sufficient progress on the road to nuclear-worthiness  In this respect, self-assessment is considered as a tool for speeding up the acquisition of expertise by the candidate countries, not as evidence of expertise having been acquired  Self-assessment exercises and/or IAEA evaluations can highlight areas where faster progress is desirable  The concerned country can expedite the process through hiring the services of experts in the areas to be addressed


Download ppt "11 Workshop on Evaluation Methodology – Vienna, 10th Dec 2008 AREVA Views on Infrastructure Assessment Andrew Teller Senior Reactor Marketing Advisor AREVA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google