1. Instruction Matters: Purdue Academic Course Transformation (IM:PACT) Longitudinal analysis of GPA, DFW and Retention Rates, Fall 2011-Fall 2013 M. Brooke Robertshaw, PhD Assessment & Data Analyst robertshaw@purdue.edu

2. ACTIVE LEARNING PROBLEM SOLVING BEING PURPOSEFUL ABOUT TEACHING What is IM:PACT?

3. IM:PACT Numbers 120 Courses (Spring 2014) Over 20,000 cumulative enrollments

4. Question Is there a difference in DFW rates and course GPA between IMPACT and Non-IMPACT courses? Population Courses with at least one instructor who has gone through IM:PACT during – Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2013

5. Is there a difference between IM:PACT and Non IM:PACT Sections? Not really. Some differences are indicated, but the trend is there are no differences between IM:PACT and Non-IM:PACT sections

6. GPA

7. DFW

8. Question: Does participation in IM: PACT courses improve retention to the institution after one year? IM:PACT Retention Rates Population

9. Answer: Patterns indicate that there is no difference in retention to the university through participation in an IM:PACT course

10. Courses with increased retention (<+2%) Courses with decreased retention (<-2%) Fall 2011 Cohort: 1 course Spring 2012 Cohort: 2 courses Spring 2013 Cohort: 5 courses Spring 2012 Cohort: 3 courses Fall 2012 Cohort: 2 courses Spring 2013 Cohort: 2 courses Answer: There are some courses that do show changes in retention after IM:PACT.

11. Future work Understanding high/low performing courses  Technological pedagogical behaviors  Fidelity of implementation Looking at impact of learning space

12. Thank you! Questions? M. Brooke Robertshaw, PhD robertshaw@purdue.edu