1. Development of Quality Monitoring System on satellite Sea Surface Salinity Products Yongsheng Zhang NESDIS/NODC – UMD College Park/ESSIC/CICS

2. In the past four years, NODC has developed a quality monitoring system known as the data Rich Inventory (RI) for Jason-2 level-2 products. The concept of RI is originally developed by NGDC/NESDIS for data management in CLASS. The basic idea is to extract existing metadata and calculate the QA statistics in a granule, store them in a database, and make them available as part of a data discovery system. NODC’s Jason-2 data quality monitoring system provides: 1) real-time original data process and visualization, statistical value calculation and QA information packing, and conversion of the outputs in CF compliant NetCDF format. 2) Provided data achiever and user the data quality information in numerical presentation via various data access tools (http, ftp and OPeNDAP) and graphical one via web interface. Development of Quality Monitoring System at NODC http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/SatelliteData/Jason2/qa.html

3. 1.To develop automation processing and visualizing tools for near real-time level-2 SMOS data in swath, daily, 3-day and monthly mean time frames; 2.To develop tools for calculation of QA statistical values in a SMOS level-2 swath data file and visualization (valid observation number, mean, standard deviation, minimum & maximum) ; 3.To perform and develop tools and methods for histogram analyses for comparing the monthly mean SSS among SMOS, Aquarius and NODC objective analysis from In-situ observations; 4.To Conduct investigation on SMOS QA flags choices Current tasks and goals of QA monitoring on SMOS/Aquarius Sea surface salinity products

4. 1.0x1.0 longitude/latitude box average; Applied Quality Flags: 1. Dg_quality_sss_# (model #): Quality index for sss, lower=better, values over 300 are filtered 2. Control_Flags_# (model #): Total = 32, but only contains 27 meaningful control flags, all applied except mask(tag # 1), roughness correction (tag # 16), availability of ECMWF(tag # 19) and grid point measurement discrimination test (tag # 19). Software: FORTRAN,C-shell, GrADS and Linux image convert; Outputs: EPS and PNG format. Development visualizations of level-2 SMOS data in swath, daily, 3-day and monthly mean

8. Development of tools for calculation of quality statistics a level-2 granule Six QA statistics: – Valid number of observations – Number of observations over 3-sigma – Mean – Standard deviation – Minimum & Maximum Provide visualizations (EPS and PNG); Convert the data into CF compliant NetCDF format and provide data access via LAS/OPeNDAP/THREDDS servers (future work)

9. Data filters: SSS1=-999; Dg_quality_SSS_1=999, Control flags not applied Zero Obs NO

13. Data Sets and Histogram Analysis Data sets: monthly 1x1 degree, April 20120 Aquarius: JPL PO.DDAC Level-3 mapped and smoothed version 1.3. SMOS: gridded by NODC from level-2 swath data with Dq_quality and control flag filters. NODC monthly objective analysis. Histogram analysis References: “The SST quality Monitor (SQUAM)”, P. Dash et al. 2010. Median and Robust Standard Deviation (RSD) are used to construct thresholds to remove extreme values, compared to conventional mean and Standard Deviation (SD) : SD= RSD=IOR/S IOR is the interquartile range: difference of the values of 75 th and 25 th percentile in an ordered dataset. S=1.348 for an ideal normal distribution Outliers: median ± 4xRSD

14. Difference of monthly SSS between SMOS and Aquarius

17. Histograms of SSS difference between SMOS and Aquarius April 2012 Number Density (%) SMOS Model 1SMOS Model 2SMOS Model 3 Left outlier: Value median+4xRSD

18. Histograms of SSS difference between NODC OA and SMOS April 2012 SMOS Model 1SMOS Model 2SMOS Model 3 Number Density (%)

19. Histogram of SSS difference between NODC OA and Aquarius April 2012

20. Histogram statistics for monthly difference among NODC OA, SMOS, and Aquarius SSS, April 2012 Observation N meanmedian Standard Deviation Robust Standard Deviation N: left outlier N: right outlier SMOS(M1)-Aqu 32856-0.09-0.011.420.422018863 SMOS(M2)-Aqu 31981-0.190.031.380.422219730 SMOS(M3)-Aqu 32889-0.120.01.470.452159805 NODC OA-SMOS (M1) 258500.310.271.641.20138182 NODC OA-SMOS (M2) 249410.360.251.721.2669277 NODC OA-SMOS (M3) 259270.340.161.851.4372324 NODC OA-Aqu 258830.340.313.701.15209358

21. SMOS level-2 data quality flags choices and impact in monthly mean results Test and Applied Quality Flags: Dg_quality_sss_# – Quality index for sss, lower=better, values over 300 are filtered Control_Flags_# – Total 32, but only contains 27 meaningful control flags, all applied except: – Mask (tag # 1) – Roughness correction (tag # 16) – Availability of ECMWF(tag # 19) – Grid point measurement discrimination test (tag # 19).

22. Distributions of number density of Dg_quality_sss_# in April 2012 (849 swath files) number density (10**6) Values of Dg_quality_sss_# flags

23. Dg_quality_SSS_1 GoodBad

24. Data filtered: Dg_quality_SSS_1 <= 300

25. Data filtered: Dg_quality_SSS_1 >= 300

26. SMOS Filter: Dg_quality_SSS_1 =999 SMOS Filter: Dg_quality_SSS_1 <300 SMOS Filters: Dg_quality_SSS_1 =999; Control_flags_1, except tag# 1,6,16,18,19 SMOS Filters: Dg_quality_SSS_1 <300; Control_flags_1, except tag# 1,6,16,18,19

27. Future Work Application of more flags in data quality analysis in SMOS level-2: Control_Flags_#, Science_Flags_# ; Compare difference among SMOS Models 1, 2 and 3. Develop NetCDF format for the QA statistics and data visualization tools; Histogram analysis and development NetCDF format for the histogram statistical data and visualizations; Development of software for automation processing and user service interfaces