1. 1 Madhya Pradesh Decentralized Planning Experience in Madhya Pradesh M.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSION

2. Overview 2 This presentation provides a brief overview of sharing the model designed to rollout the Decentralized Planning Process in the State

3. Present Status 3 Villages participated in process Block plans ULB plans Districts plan Remark 52000313 360 (+ 6000 wards) 50 Online available in public domain …….of preparation of various plan through decentralized approach First ever…… Prioritizing Activities by COMMUNITY themselves. Beneficiary identification during the planning process by GRAM SABHA. Assessing status of Basic infrastructure of the stateBasic infrastructure of Assessing status Delivery of services.

4. Key Sectors involved 4 INFRA. HEALTH EDU. LIVELI. ENERGY CIVIL RIGHTS Departments (No) Development Schemes (No.) Community Demands / Activities (No) Remark 28180 10,00,000 (Approx. ) Online available in public domain

5. Framework, Organizational Structures, Methods, Techniques, Tools Prescribed 5 “MP Model” (DPP structure) of Madhya Pradesh State Planning Commission ( Link A)( Link A) Technical Support System for Capacity building of Planning Units. (Link B). (Link B) Technical Support Groups for facilitation of planning processes ( Link C)( Link C) Methods, techniques, tools prescribed (LINK D)(LINK D)

6. Outputs of DPP 6 Village Master Plan (52,000 Plans ) Village Panchayat Plan(23,000 Plans) Block level Plan (313 Plans) Districts Plan (50 Districts Plans) Rural and Urban Plan (Separate)Urban Plan Scheme specific plan (965 Plans) Example RKVY-Dist. Morena Scheme specific plan (965 Plans) Sector Plans (06 Key Sectors ) Department Plans (All ) Beneficiary identification. Planning & feedback mechanism (in process).

7. Main Advantages of this Exercise 7 Ownership of plans & Involvement of stakeholders Integrate participatory monitoring, evaluation and learning systems within the planning cycle itself Prioritize planning in advance for all departments/schemes/sectors especially flagship programmes Resource matching with “preferences of peoples’ demand” and “Departments’ pre-set targets” Effective efficient use of through access to untied funds through village level plans like CDAP, NREGA, SSA, BRGF plan etc. Achievement of sectoral goals (MDGs/ 11 th 5yr. Plan) through convergence amongst departments and schemes

8. … Main Advantages 8 Enhance sensitivity and accountability towards preferences of people Build awareness level on schemes Feedback to improve scheme design Transparency, Feed-back possible Provide opportunity to build capacities of grassroots level govt. functionaries Ensure Social Inclusion. Scope of local innovation Identifying champions at every level of implementation Driving convergences at the district level

9. Area of further Improvement (Quality issues) 9  Limited communication efforts specially mass communication  Convergence  Role of elected representatives  Managing and sustaining Change  Urban Planning  Integration of rural and urban  Human Resources (inadequate)

10. Area of further Improvement (Quality issues) 10 Limited capacity building efforts : Strengthening of DPCs and District Planning Offices Capacity development of key Stake holders specially in DPP, Acts, urban planning etc. Data management system Capacity Building in software application E- learning programmes Empanelment of National experts /Quality Institutes Inclusion of DPP section in other developmental modules

11. Way Forward … 11 Community based monitoring system -Social audit Resource mapping as per the demand GIS based action monitoring Awards and appreciations Political sensitization Strengthening of capacity of DPCs and key stake holders

12. Thanks 12