1. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces What makes an open place (e.g., plaza, mall, park, etc.) pleasant? How do we measure/assess the pleasant qualities of these spaces? What view of city life is put forward in this film? What was the societal impact (in New York City) of Whyte’s work?

2. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces What ethical issues arise from Whyte’s filming behaviour occuring in the street? What does the current Canadian Tri-Council Ethics Code state about the filming of behaviour in public?

3. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Characteristics of best used plazas: higher proportion of groups rather than solitary individuals Greater proportion of female users Variablility over day, week, season *”People are most likely to sit where there are places to sit”

4. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Design Criteria for Plazas Movable chairs (benches are less desirable) Seating area should be approximately 10% of the total open space Protection from sun, wind and noise (use trees and water) Availablility of food (snack bars, vendors, tables & chairs) Related to the street, near the action

5. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Seagram Building, 375 Park Avenue (52 nd to 53 rd Streets, designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Phillip Johnson (1958), who won an architectural competition arranged by Phyllis Lambert, architect and daughter of Sam Bronfman. What building in Toronto did Mies van der Rohe design that is quite similar to Seagram’s?

6. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

7. Seagram Building Architects: Ludwig Mies van der Rohe & Phillip Johnson Built in 1958

8. Toronto-Dominion Centre Mies van der Rohe’s only Canadian building

9. Paley Park Designed by Zion & Breen on the site of the former Stork Club (just off 5 th Avenue at 53 rd Street

10. Paley Park

12. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Design Criteria for Plazas: “Triangulation: presence of people or things that induce strangers to talk with each other Surveillance comes from vendors, newsstands, building employees. Dealing with “undesirables”: make the area appeal to anyone

13. Bryant Park Renovations Movies, ice skating, & a cafe draw people into the park

14. Bryant Park Renovations Movable chairs permit many sitting opportunities to facilitate differing activities

15. Bryant Park Renovations Note the high density of users on a warm summer day

16. Bryant Park Renovations A hawk visits the park!

17. Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Design Criteria for Indoor Spaces (e.g., atria, galleries, courtyards, arcades, concourses, indoor plazas) Seating Food Retail stores Public toilets Presence

18. Underhill, P. (1999). Why we buy: The science of shopping. New York: Simon & Schuster. A fascinating description of Underhill’s company’s (Envirosell) research into consumer behaviour. % buying jeans after trying them on: –Females: 25% –Males: 65%

20. Underhill, P. (1999). Why we buy: The science of shopping. New York: Simon & Schuster. A fascinating description of Underhill’s company’s (Envirosell) research into consumer behaviour. % buying jeans after trying them on: Females: 25% Males: 65%

21. Making Sense of Supermarket Shelf Displays

22. Envirosell at work

23. Examing price tags: Females: 86% Males: 72% “Butt-brush” stops female purchasers Importance of adjacencies Detection of shoplifters Importance of shopping basket distribution Right turn bias of North American shoppers

24. Mean shopping times in a national housewares chain store (USA): Women with women8 min. 15 secs. Women with children7 min. 19 secs. Women alone5 min. 2 secs. Women with men4 min. 41 secs. How could you increase women’s shopping times for women accompanied by males?