1. Innovative Project Delivery May 15-19, 2005 Texas Department of Transportation Texas Turnpike Authority Division Texas Department of Transportation Texas Turnpike Authority Division FHWA / AASHTO Austin, Texas

4. Cintra-Zachry Plan is Conceptual Subject to Revision SH 130 – Segments 5 and 6 Dallas Southeast Connector Dallas Northeast Connector Georgetown to Temple Temple to Dallas SE Connector San Antonio Southeast Loop UP Railroad Relocation (MoPac) IH 10 Expansion, Seguin to San Antonio SE Loop SH 130 – Segments 1 to 4 Near Term (2005 – 2010) Mid Term (2010 – 2025) Long Term (2025 - ) San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley Dallas to Austin Freight Rail Dallas to Austin High Speed Rail Austin – San Antonio High Speed Rail Forth Worth Southwest & Northwest Connector

5. Proposed Cintra Near-Term Facilities Concession Fees - Preliminary / Subject to Revision 20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015 Toll Road – S. of Austin to San Antonio Toll Road – S. of Dallas to E. of Dallas Toll Road – E. of Dallas to N. of Dallas Initial Toll Road – Georgetown to Temple Scope Toll Road – Temple to S. of Dallas of Work Toll Road – S. of San Antonio to E. of San Antonio Railroad Relocation Project – Central Texas ► $ 36,700,000 ► $ 580,000,000 ► $ 407,900,000 ► $ 116,300,000 ► $ 32,300,000

6. Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and Comprehensive Development Agreements

7. Purpose of Trans-Texas Corridor CDA Accelerated delivery of benefits to the traveling publicAccelerated delivery of benefits to the traveling public Attract private sector partnersAttract private sector partners –Equity –Innovation The CDA will provide an umbrella framework for the long-term partnershipThe CDA will provide an umbrella framework for the long-term partnership

8. Risk Assessment and Allocation Issue/RiskDesign-Bid-BuildCDA Who is better able to manage the risk  TxDOTDeveloperTxDOTDeveloper Project Scope – Purpose & Need  Project Design  Environmental Studies (state and federal)  Utility Coordination and Relocation       Right-of-Way Acquisition  Environmental Permits  Financial      Construction      Operations      Maintenance     

9. TRADITIONAL VS. CDA TYPICAL SCHEDULE Traditional Traditional2005200620072008200920102011201220132014 Preliminary Design & EISDESIGN ROW BID CONSTRUCTION CDA Preliminary Design & EIS DESIGN SOLICIT ROW CONSTRUCTION TIME SAVINGS

10. Ed Pensock, Jr., P.E. Director of Corridor Systems Texas Turnpike Authority Division Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation Texas Turnpike Authority Division Texas Department of Transportation Texas Turnpike Authority Division 125 East 11th Street Austin, TX 78701-2483 Phone: (512) 936-0965 FAX : (512) 936-0970 www.keeptexasmoving.org

11. EDA / CDA gives TxDOT authority to: Enter into an agreement with a private entity to construct, maintain, repair, operate, extend or expand a turnpikeEnter into an agreement with a private entity to construct, maintain, repair, operate, extend or expand a turnpike Negotiate professional and consulting servicesNegotiate professional and consulting services Negotiate terms of financingNegotiate terms of financing

12. Key Benefits of EDA / CDA Approach Fixes price early in design phaseFixes price early in design phase Guarantees completion dateGuarantees completion date Single point of responsibilitySingle point of responsibility Defines important project risksDefines important project risks Life cycle cost efficiencyLife cycle cost efficiency Captures private sector innovationCaptures private sector innovation Streamlines project administrationStreamlines project administration Enhances cost control and risk managementEnhances cost control and risk management

13. Donald C. Toner Jr., SR/WA Right of Way Administrator Texas Department of Transportation