3. The implications have been assessed by applying these eligibility criteria to reported 2007 VET activity Ineligible enrolments Government funded in 2007 but become ineligible for funding under skills reform Newly eligible enrolments Fee-for-service enrolments that become eligible for government funding under skills reform

4. Data limitations: Does not consider changes in enrolment patterns resulting from skills reform Includes reported fee-for-service activity only

5. i.e. The potential shift of 60,000 enrolments from fee-for-service to govt funding (74%) These are not additional enrolments; they are the potential net funding shift from FFS to GF These enrolments (18%) become ineligible for government funding

6. 84% of domestic fee-for-service SCH eligible for government funding (74% enrolments) 15% of government funded SCH ineligible for government funding (18% enrolments) The net funding shift from FFS to government

7. 68% of the ‘ineligible’ enrolments have access to government funded VET training at a higher level 32% are ineligible for any government funded VET training

8. Victorian population (15-64) by highest qualification held CohortQualification heldEligible for VET?Persons Population share (15-64) 1Graduate Certificate or aboveIneligible (except Found.)832,70024% 2AQF 1-6Yes - at higher levels924,47627% 3No post-school qual. or under 20Yes – at any level1,697,22449% 4N/AFoundation coursesAll100% If just 2 per cent of these Victorians enrolled in VET, this translates into a potential 34,000 additional students entering the VET system

9. Business Services, Community Services & Health and Electro-technology & Communications are the three industries most effected (25,000 ineligible places in total) AQF 2-4 largest number of ineligible places

10. 44% of gov-funded Public Admin. & Safety enrolments become ineligible

11. All students under 20 have access to a GF VET enrolment Enrolments by younger students (those aged 20-39) account for the largest number of ineligible enrolments