4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013.

4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013

Executive Panel : LISP Customers Discuss Modern Network Solutions
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Executive Panel : LISP Customers Discuss Modern Network Solutions PNLRST-2020 Fabio Maino, Distinguished Engineer, LISP Team Colin Kincaid, Vice President, NOSTG Marketing & Architecture

Introduction Fabio Maino LISP Perspectives Colin Kincaid Customer Use Case :: Cisco IT Khalid Jawaid Customer Use Case :: IBM Chris Williams Customer Use Case :: Etat du Valais Christian Quenzer Customer Use Case :: AVM GmbH Eric van Uden Questions/Answers ALL Closing Words Fabio Maino Technical Seminar Agenda – Full Day Part 1 (2 hours) Break Part 2 (1hr 45 mins) Lunch Part 3 (1hr 45 mins) Break Part 4 (2hrs 15mins)

LISP Introduction Fabio Maino, Distinguished Engineer LISP Team
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Introduction Fabio Maino, Distinguished Engineer LISP Team

Introduction LISP has come a long way since 2006 IETF…
LISP Update LISP has come a long way since 2006 IETF… when a small group of Cisco engineers started the design of a protocol for identity/location separation 8 IETFs RFCs published during 2013 (RFC , RFC 7052) IETF LISP WG now focusing on LISP use cases Most importantly we have very significant customer deployments Enterprise and Service Provider space Use cases: Internet VPNs, Multi-homing, IPv6 Transition, Data Center Host Mobility

Introduction LISP is a transformative technology
What have we learned so far? LISP is a transformative technology LISP adds significant new capabilities and reduces complexities! LISP deployments are now moving beyond ‘early adopters’ Large number of customers deploying LISP in production Large scale of LISP deployments and wide diversity of LISP deployments Commitment to and reliance on LISP LISP engages a broad range of new participation in networking Open standard, control plane/data plane separation enables… Universities and researchers to experiment on new and novel designs Easy and effective Integration with software defined networking initiatives Open source code implementations and wide hardware/device support

Use Cases: Internet Based VPN
IP based, transport independent VPN solution Support for multi-tenancy and security Global mobility Minimal infrastructure disruption Today’s Testimonial Etat du Valais: Christian Quenzer IP Network West DC LISP Site Legacy Site East PxTR Mapping DB

Use Cases: BGP-free Multi-homing
Multi-provider connectivity and policy without BGP complexity OpEx-friendly multi-homing across different providers Simple Policy Management Ingress/Egress Traffic Engineering Today’s Testimonial AVM GmbH: Eric van Uden LISP routers LISP Site Internet

Use Cases: IPv6 Transition
Rapid deployment of IPv6 over IPv4 Or IPv4 over IPv6 Accelerates IPv6 adoption Minimal added configurations No core network changes Today’s Testimonial Cisco IT: Khalid Jawaid AVM GmbH: Eric van Uden IPv4 Core IPv4 Enterprise Core v6 v4 V6 xTR

Use Cases: Host Mobility
Host mobility for Data Center applications DC Migration Disaster Recovery Hybrid Cloud Extension Integrated mobility, inbound routing optimization, OTV integration Today’s Testimonial IBM: Chris Williams Data Center 1 Data Center 2 a.b.c.1 VM VM move LISP routers Internet

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Perspectives Colin Kincaid, Vice President NOSTG Marketing & Architecture

LISP Perspective NOSTG is a central innovation engine for CISCO
LISP and Cisco NOSTG is a central innovation engine for CISCO Supports the core of the LISP HIP team (engineering + marketing) With LISP, Cisco is innovating at the cutting edge of technology providing An open, scalable architecture for network virtualization Easy to deploy Focused on simplifying network operations

LISP Perspective Platforms supporting LISP (Cisco and Open Source)

LISP Perspective Cisco is strongly committed to LISP technology
Future Work Cisco is strongly committed to LISP technology Future work is focused on: Integration with SDN (OpenDayLight LISP project) Data Center and Hybrid Cloud Extension Campus Architecture Support to Customers with existing and new use cases

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 IT

Member of the Technical Staff, Cisco IT
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 As a Member of Technical Staff at Cisco Systems, Khalid Jawaid is the Lead Design Engineer for IPv6 integration/deployment across Cisco and the EON project (Cisco IT's SDN Initiative). Double CCIE certified and experienced in routing and switching technologies and WAN design, Khalid has been at Cisco for the last 13 years and worked with multiple technologies across TAC, Cisco Services and Cisco IT. Khalid Jawaid Member of the Technical Staff, Cisco IT

Over 180,000 people around the world in the extended Cisco family
Introducing Cisco The Global Cisco Family 369 locations in 90 countries 450+ buildings 51 data centers and server rooms 1500+ labs world wide (500+ in San Jose) 66,000+ Employees 20,000 Channel Partners 110+ Application Service Providers 210+ Business and Support Development Partners Over 180,000 people around the world in the extended Cisco family Estimated Numbers

Cisco IT LISP Use-case IPv6 Transition Support
Cisco Live 2013 Cisco IT LISP Use-case IPv6 Transition Support 4/13/2017 IPv6 Deployment strategy IPv6 deployment challenges Business Impact Delayed deployment of IPv6 affects product development/testing and IPv6 adoption. Dual stack IPv4 only WAN Backbone L3 MPLS VPN Long term plan that absorbs cost in established lifecycle process Financial investment required Migration to L2 VPN Overlay Day-1 tunneling techniques do not scale very well Next-Generation overlay architecture Locator/ID Separation Protocol Have a quick and scalable solution in hand to relieve delivery pressure Anycast ISATAP Manual 6in4 Tunnel

Why LISP ? Day-1 tunneling techniques Next-Generation overlay
Cisco Live 2013 Why LISP ? 4/13/2017 Day-1 tunneling techniques Next-Generation overlay Anycast ISATAP End-Client centric solution Support challenge Locator/ID Separation Protocol Configuration & Troubleshooting simplicity Any-to-any traffic flows IPv4 exit-strategy (IPv4 over IPv6) New capabilities (Mobility, Virtualization) Manual 6in4 tunnels Configuration overhead Performance impact (Hub & Spoke) DMVPN Potential routing challenges when multi-homing Scalability concerns Any-to-any traffic flows

EMEAR LISP IPv6 Deployment overview
Cisco Live 2013 EMEAR LISP IPv6 Deployment overview 4/13/2017 DC DC Internet Cisco Enterprise Backbone Network Mapping System Proxy Tunnel Router ASR1006 Geographically diverse Standalone / Self-managed Primary / Backup PxTR London Amsterdam Dual Stack Tunnel Router ASR 1006 & ISR 3945 LISP IPv6 in IPv4 Carrier Managed L3VPN MPLS Default Route / HSRPv6 to attract traffic Load sharing defined by WAN topology Internet IPv4 Only Dual Stack RLOC route-loss detection RLOC probing Locator Status Bits (LSB) Solicited Map-Request (SMR) DS3 DS3 DS3 E1 E1 BB Liveliness features Load Sharing Primary/Backup Primary/Backup DC Cisco Remote Offices From an interim to permanent solution ? “LISP allows us to postpone some of our WAN migrations in locations where services are not available or cost inefficient “ Cisco Managed CE Map-Resolver, Map-Server, Proxy Ingress/Egress Tunnel Router Cisco Managed CE Ingress/Egress Tunnel Router IPSEC VPN Tunnel head-end

Deployment Status Pilot Deployment Accelerated Deployment
Cisco Live 2013 Deployment Status 4/13/2017 Pilot Deployment (Completed September 2013) Accelerated Deployment (Completed November 2013) General Deployment (Target completion May 2014) Istanbul (Turkey) Greenpark (UK) Munich (Germany) Moscow (Russia) 80+ Remote Offices 7000+ end-users Galway (Ireland) Vimercatie (Italy) Dubai (UAE) 3 Engineering Data Centers Internal LISP Design (Guidelines, Cut-sheet, test plan) Resource training (Configuration & Troubleshooting) Implementation (Test plan execution and monitoring) Operational support In numbers … Target = IPv6 configuration automation via scripts ! LISP is the easy part ! 1700 end-users 1300 IPv6 endpoints + 30 Mbps IPv6 peak BW 0 LISP related cases opened !!!

Lesson learned Network convergence MTU handling Feature Support
Cisco Live 2013 Lesson learned 4/13/2017 Network convergence Minor routing architecture changes required to match IPv4 convergence SLA RLOC route-down detection provides fastest convergence (/32 Prefix leakage) RLOC Probing detects all other failures MTU handling Only stateful fragmentation (pMTU) supported as per IPv6 best practices Previous overlay solutions provided stateful fragmentation Our LISP implementation uncovered some pMTU support problems Feature Support Most exciting capabilities/enhancements included in more recent versions of code

Cisco IT LISP Strategy Evaluate Learn Explore
Cisco Live 2013 Cisco IT LISP Strategy 4/13/2017 Evaluate Learn Explore Potential use-cases Data-Center VM Mobility Client IP Portability & Disaster Recovery Traffic engineering (SDN/OnePK)

Conclusion Big wins for Cisco IT
Cisco Live 2013 Conclusion 4/13/2017 Big wins for Cisco IT Accelerated EMEAR IPv6 deployment within 6-9 months More time to explore most cost-efficient WAN backbone replacement Supported on existing WAN Edge platforms – no capital investment Easy to deploy … It just works ! Relatively low risk learning experience for future use-cases THANKS to the LISP-Support for the guidance and great customer focus !

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Chris enjoyed a successful career with IBM spanning 21 years. His notable achievements include the role of chief architect for IBM on the multi-million dollar Lloyds TSB converged IP network, and conceiving and developing IBM’s global secure network infrastructure connecting its outsourcing clients to IBM Global Services. Chris now works as an independent consultant, and more recently at IBM, working on a data centre and network migration. PIC Chris Williams Infrastructure Architect/Network Architect CEng (MIET), IBM

IBM and RSA Company Overviews
Cisco Live 2013 IBM and RSA 4/13/2017 Company Overviews International Business Machines Corporation. Founded Headquarters in Armonk, New York. Multinational technology, consulting and hosting corporation. Royal and Sun Alliance, Founded Headquartered in London. Operating in 32 countries. 17 million customers in 140 countries . Listed on the London Stock Exchange and FTSE 100 Index. In 2001, IBM and RSA signed the first IT services agreement for IBM to manage and support the IT infrastructure and provide end-to-end service integration across all of the third party technology suppliers.

Data Centre Migration Challenges for IBM
Cisco Live 2013 Data Centre Migration Challenges for IBM 4/13/2017 Why this is an issue To reduce the time it takes to migrate servers or applications from: a customers data centre to an IBM data centre an ‘inherited’ data centre to an IBM strategic data centre within a data centre, from a legacy to a new environment (our challenge here) Competitors who can perform a faster migration can offer a lower price to the customer and have higher margins. Traditional migration approaches all have limitations: Application migration Physical move Whole DC ‘Big Bang’ migration

DC Migration without IP mobility / IP Retention
Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration without IP mobility / IP Retention 4/13/2017 Application Migration – Complexity of Ensuring Interfaces are Maintained Move application to new DC requires change of IP address and hostname Takes longer to start moving servers due to data gathering / documentation of legacy application interfaces Risk – has an interface been overlooked?

Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration without IP mobility / IP Retention 4/13/2017 Application Migration – Complexity of Ensuring Interfaces are Maintained Complexity of ensuring interfaces are maintained - affects even non-moved / non- migrated systems DNS may not always help with legacy hard coded applications Applications local and remote may need to be amended Firewalls need to be amended Risk - Can you be sure you have the complete picture?

Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration without IP mobility / IP Retention 4/13/2017 What is the traditional approach? Move a server (physical move or virtual migration) and keep the IP Address and Hostname Should be simpler process – Is this true?

Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration without IP mobility / IP Retention 4/13/2017 Affinity Groups Move requires understanding of server VLAN cross-patching / affinity groups if smaller units of servers to be migrated in one event Subnet A Subnet B Subnet C

DC Migration – Server Physical Move
Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration – Server Physical Move 4/13/2017 Physical Move of Affinity Groups – The Reality Physically move the server and patch into new infrastructure: Takes longer to start moving servers due to data gathering and understanding of virtual server network interfaces. Requires understanding of server VLAN cross-patching & affinity groups if smaller units of servers to be migrated in one event Conflicting VLAN numbering in switch blocks – virtual server VLAN re-configuration required during migration event Risk – has a server or VLAN cross connection been overlooked? Server virtualisation / platform refresh is a follow on project

Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration – Big Bang 4/13/2017 Every Server Migrated in Single Migration Event (Physical Move or Re-build) Without a solution that enables IP mobility with IP Retention for each server then ‘Big Bang’ approach implies: Years in Planning - takes longer to start moving servers due to data gathering and move planning Longer storage migration cycle that requires keeping a large data set in synch over WAN (or other methods) High risk / large service outage during migration event Cast of thousands / large workforce required

DC Migration with IP mobility / IP Retention
Cisco Live 2013 DC Migration with IP mobility / IP Retention 4/13/2017 Using LISP We need a way to move servers with IP mobility and removing affinity group constraints of traditional approach: Move a server (physical or virtual) and keep the IP Address and Hostname Should be simpler process – Is this true using LISP?

LISP Implementation Models
We Used Model 3 Model 1 – To use this method, would require every location to have its site WAN routers involved in the LISP ‘cloud’ Model 2 – Located at a pinch point in the network Model 3 – The model we intend to use - Link is across the machine room floor in our case

The Migration Scope Legacy DC to New Infrastructure – Same Location

LISP Infrastructure Cross Machine Room Links – ASR1002 Routers

LISP Server Migration Initial State

LISP Server Migration Intermediate State – Some Servers Migrated

LISP Server Migration Servers Migrated

LISP Server Migration Servers Migrated – HSRP Cut-Over
Migration Steps: New DC aggregation router interface enabled & added to HRSP group HSRP priority raised - ‘active’ router becomes New DC aggregation router Routes injected into New DC OSPF & removed from legacy Remove HSRP configuration on the MR-MS LISP router i/f for fully migrated subnet HSRP Removed on MR-MS LISP Router to avoid traffic black holing from hosts on other LISP mobility subnets in the new DC to the subnet being migrated.

LISP Server Migration End State – Servers Migrated & Cut-Over to New DC Complete

Why Choose LISP Why not use other Layer 2 LAN extension methods?
Cisco Live 2013 Why Choose LISP 4/13/2017 Why not use other Layer 2 LAN extension methods? We looked at but rejected: IRB (Integrated Route Bridging) VPLS (Virtual Private LAN Service) over MPLS There are two viable candidate technologies. They are: OTV (Overlay Transport Virtualization) LISP (Locator Identifier Separation Protocol) Our Preferred Method is LISP Because it’s a safer interconnection method. It protects against broadcast storms and spanning tree issues Non-disruptive Layer 3 connection to existing live data centre's Works with all server types – physical/virtual/x86/P-Series/Mainframe

Cisco Services – How They Helped Us
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Cisco Services – How They Helped Us

Cisco Professional Services
Data Centre Replica – Cisco Lab Reading UK Replica data centre - same hardware & code levels LISP infrastructure - 4x Cisco AS1002’s Comprehensive suite of LISP function & performance tests 129Mb test report ! LISP configurations created Post implementation support

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 du Valais

State of Valais General Facts
Cisco Live 2013 State of Valais 4/13/2017 General Facts One of the 26 states forming Switzerland. Composed of government, administration, police and justice. 5’000 employees. Serves more than 320’000 inhabitants. Most offices are located in seven major cities.

State of Valais About the Network
Cisco Live 2013 State of Valais 4/13/2017 About the Network 7 POPs, one in each of the main cities. 200 buildings 800 network devices 5’000 IP Phones / 1’000 TDM Phones Operate a dedicated MPLS backbone build on dark fiber. 90 % of the links are build with dark fiber. 300 km of dark fibers 10 % of the links are build with leased line or leased L3 services.

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Existing topologies

Existing Topology Connecting the Police’s Offices Transport Sites
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Existing Topology Connecting the Police’s Offices Voice Data Internet Transport P-to-P IPSec tunnel for “blue” VRF. Juniper SSG on both sides. Sites 12 remote locations. 2 VRFs. IP Phones register to central CUCM. Voice call goes through PSTN. SRST for some phones. Single-homed Provider A IPv4 PSTN CUCM Cluster Leased L3 VPN All routers are outsourced Voice gateway with SRST

Existing Topology Connecting the Administration's Offices Transport
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Existing Topology Connecting the Administration's Offices Voice Data Internet Transport DMVP. GRE tunnels with IPSec. Nothing Sites 20 remote locations. 0-1-2 VRFs. CUCM Express IP Phones register to local CUCME. Voice call goes through PSTN. Single-homed Provider B IPv4 PSTN Multiple leased L3 VPN CUCM Cluster Voice gateway with CUCME

Existing Topology Putting All Together Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Voice
Data Internet Provider B IPv4 Provider A IPv4 PSTN Multiple leased L3 VPN CUCM Cluster Leased L3 VPN All routers are outsourced Voice gateway with CUCME Voice gateway with SRST

Existing Topology Limitations
Cisco Live 2013 Existing Topology 4/13/2017 Limitations It’s a complex solution  DMVPN, encrypted GRE tunnel There must be at least one voice gateway and one PSTN access on the remote sites for telephony. Require lots of configuration whether to add a new site or a new VRF  also require modification on the provider side in each case. Absolutely not scalable whether at site level or at VRF level. Lots of centrally hosted services are not available to the remote sites CUCM, Unity and UCCE. Radio network. Unable to deploy IPv6 to the sites.

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 THE LISP PROJECT

Goals of the LISP Project
Cisco Live 2013 Goals of the LISP Project 4/13/2017 Provider’s network Should be able to replace all existing solutions. One leased L3 VPN will be used to interconnect all the existing sites. This leased L3 VPN will be put in production in parallel to the actual. We should be able to migrate every site independently and one after the other. Our networks should be totally isolated from the leased L3 VPN. Changes to our networks should be transparent for the provider. QoS should be implemented and enforced by the provider on the leased L3 VPN

Goals of the LISP Project
Cisco Live 2013 Goals of the LISP Project 4/13/2017 Ours networks All centrally hosted services should be available to all the remote sites. No more voice gateway and/or PSTN access on the sites. All IP Phones should register to the corporate CUCM cluster. All external voice calls should goes through the centralized PSTN access. Voice and radio traffic must be prioritized. Each remote site will have at least 8 VRFs implemented. Encryption must be possible, if needed, at VRF level.

LISP Topology Provider’s network HQ Sites Headquarters
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology Provider’s network Site 1 Headquarters Provider A IPv4 HQ Multihomed, two CPE. One provider. Sites Single-home, one CPE. BW between1 and 8 Mb/s. Same provider on every site.

LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Site 3 Site 1 Site 2
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Site 3 Site 1 Site 2 Internet Provider A IPv4

LISP Topology User’s VRFs HQ Headquarters
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Internet HQ Has lots of networks in each of VRF. Some networks are /16. Gives access to the Internet . Hosts 3 DCs. Provider A IPv4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology User’s VRFs Sites Headquarters
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Internet Sites Have 1-2 networks in each VRF. Some networks are /24 but most are smaller. Have Loopback interfaces in each VRF. Provider A IPv4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology User’s VRFs HQ RTR acts as Headquarters Map Server.
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Internet Provider A IPv4 HQ RTR acts as Map Server. Map Resolver. PxTR Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology User’s VRFs Site RTR Headquarters acts as xTR
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology User’s VRFs Headquarters Internet Site RTR acts as xTR use PxTR at HQ use MS/MR at HQ Provider A IPv4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology Adding GETVPN Headquarters Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology Adding GETVPN Headquarters Internet Provider A IPv4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology Adding GETVPN HQ RTR acts as Headquarters Map Server.
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology Adding GETVPN Headquarters Internet Provider A IPv4 HQ RTR acts as Map Server. Map Resolver. xTR Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

LISP Topology Adding GETVPN Site RTR Headquarters acts as xTR
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 LISP Topology Adding GETVPN Headquarters Internet Site RTR acts as xTR use MS/MR at HQ Provider A IPv4 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3

NTP can be your main concern
Cisco Live 2013 LISP Topology 4/13/2017 Adding GETVPN The “orange” VRF is only used to connect the LISP routers to the Key Servers. We defined only one Loopback per site in the “orange” VRF. Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Phase 1 use “Pre-shared” key for authentication. The “orange” VRF is not encrypted. Voice traffic is not encrypted by GETVPN, this has to be done directly by the phones. NTP can be your main concern

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Conclusions

Cisco Live 2013 Why LISP 4/13/2017 Key Facts LISP was easy to deploy and has a great supporting team. LISP worked out of the box. It’s easy to add encryption on a VRF basis (GETVPN). The configurations on each remote site are the same  only the provider’s link has to be adapted. It’s very easy to add new sites with minimal configuration on the HQ side. IPv6 can be pushed to the sites with the current implementation  no change on the provider’s side. We are totally isolated from the provider’s network.

Next steps CY2014 Multiple service providers  disjoined RLOC-space.
Cisco Live 2013 Next steps 4/13/2017 CY2014 Multiple service providers  disjoined RLOC-space. Using the Internet as an “SP” to deploy very small sites. Using LISP to solve the north-south routing optimization in the case of VM- mobility between DC.

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 GmbH

Country Manager, AVM GmbH
Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Currently Country Manager at AVM. Experience in the data and telecommunications sector since the early1990s. Specialized in remote access projects with ISDN, GSM and VPN for several international customers. At AVM, Eric is responsible for sales in the Dutch market. He launched IPv6 with customer XS4ALL to the Dutch consumer market and is a member of the Dutch IPv6 Taskforce. Looking forward to commercial use of LISP with AVM products. Eric van Uden Country Manager, AVM GmbH

About AVM AVM is a Berlin-based communications specialist that develops and manufactures products for your broadband connection. The company has received numerous awards for its innovative FRITZ!Box family. FRITZ! offers fast Internet access, easy networking, convenient telephony and versatile multimedia applications.

- EUR 250 million in revenue
Overview Founded 1986 in Berlin Management formed by shareholders Fiscal 2012 Worldwide production with focus on Germany - EUR 250 million in revenue - 420 employees

What sets AVM apart Proximity to our core markets (EU and D)
Continuous innovations In-house developments – made in Berlin Speed – time to market

What is a FRITZ!Box? A router for the Smart Home or Office
Models for DSL,LTE or Cable WLAN AC + N with 1300 Mbit/s (5 GHz) and 450 Mbit/s (2.4 GHz) simultaneously Telephone system (ISDN, analog, IP) with DECT base station, answering machine and faxing

Why LISP at AVM? Request for multiple WAN, Aggregation of multiple links To speed up IPv6 implementation Request for cooperation from CISCO LISP Team

LISP in the FRITZ!Box, IPv6
LISP: Locator / Identifier Separator Protocol Idea: address space of my hosts (EIDs) is independent of the address space from my ISP (RLOC) Very flexible tunneling scenarios are possible: IPv4 in IPv6, IPv6 in IPv4, v6 in v6, v4 in v4

LISP in the FRITZ!Box, Hybrid solutions
Aggregation of multiple links with LISP

Example, Hybrid solution VDSL and LTE

LISP References LISP Information LISP Information LISP Mailing Lists
Cisco LISP Site ……………………. (IPv4 and IPv6) Cisco LISP Marketing Site ………... LISP Beta Network Site …………… or LISP DDT Root ……………………... IETF LISP Working Group ……...… LISP Mailing Lists Cisco LISP Questions ……………… IETF LISP Working Group ………… LISP Interest (public) ………………. LISPmob Questions ………………...

Cisco Live 2013 4/13/2017 Note: This slide is now a Layout choice

4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013

4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "4/13/2017 Cisco Live 2013."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback