1. Camdeboo Local Municipality 2012 Blue and Green Drop Reports Camdeboo Local Municipality 2012 Blue and Green Drop Reports

2. Water Services Authority Camdeboo LM Water Services Provider(s) Camdeboo LM Municipal Blue Drop Score 51.65 % Performance Area Systems Graaff- Reinet AberdeenNieu Bethesda Water Safety Planning (35%) 64 58 Treatment Process Management (10%) 24 15 DWQ Compliance (30%) 36 Management, Accountability (10%) 32 Asset Management (15%) 69 43 48 Bonus Scores 4.50 0 Penalties 00 0 Blue Drop Score (2012) 53.49 %42.11 %42.86 % 2011 Blue Drop Score 32.81% 33.38 %43.28% 2010 Blue Drop Score 40.13 % 36.13 %35.38 % System Design Capacity (Ml/d) 16No Information Operational Capacity (% ito Design) 62.50No Information Population Served 32 50010 0001 000 Average daily Consumption (l/p/d) 307.69No InformationInformation Microbiological Compliance (%) 92.2%87.5%91.7% Chemical Compliance (%) >99.9%

3. Areas that requires attention in terms of the Blue Drop Requirements Water Safety Planning Treatment Process Management DWQ Compliance Management, Accountability Asset Management

4. Challenges related to the Water Treatment Works The absence of an operational logbook; The Operations and Maintenance manual compiled by DWA RRU not being utilised; The jar testing equipment is available but not used as yet; The working conditions of the process controllers (toilet facilities and the area for eating is not favourable to instil pride in the work place); The filtration process can be improved noting the recorded turbidity levels of final water as well as the visible unacceptable condition of the filter media; The gas chlorine content measurement scale was out of order and is identified as a significant risk area; The lack of flow recording at Aberdeen boreholes is a risky operation since the municipality has no means of monitoring abstraction vs. safe yield of the aquifer.

5. Water Services Authority:Camdeboo Local Municipality Assessment AreasAberdeenGraff RenietNieu Bethseda Technology Oxidation ponds Activated sludge and sludge lagoons Oxidation ponds Design Capacity (Ml/d) 0.3753.10.045 Operational % i.t.o. Design Capacity 117.3%154.8%71.1% i)Microbiological Compliance NI i)Chemical Compliance NI i)Physical Compliance NI Annual Average Effluent Quality Compliance NI Wastewater Risk Rating (%CRR/CRRmax) 88.2% (↑)94.1% (→)35.3% (↓) Highest Risk Area Operating capacity exceeds design capacity, non-compliance with R2834, no effluent compliance monitoring Non-compliance with R2834, no effluent compliance monitoring Risk Abatement Process No W 2 RAP Rough draft W 2 RAP Capital & Refurbishment expenditure in 2010/2011 R4.2mR7.3m Description of Projects’ Expenditure Extensions to WWTW Wastewater Risk Abatement planning Risk management is not practiced in Camdeboo LM Additional Notes None

6. Risk trend per plant as CRR/CRR max %

7. Highest Risk Area  Operating capacity exceeds design capacity;  Non-compliance with R2834/17;  No effluent compliance monitoring.

8. Recommendations to improve the DWQM & WWQM  To develop an action plan that will address all the gaps as identified in the 2012 Blue Drop and Green Drop Reports.  Upload the data on a monthly basis on the Blue Drop System and Green Drop System.  Develop the Waste Water Risk Abatement Plan.

9. ThanksThanks www.dwa.gov.za/bluedropwww.dwa.gov.za/bluedrop; www.dwa.gov.za/greendrop www.dwa.gov.za/bluedropwww.dwa.gov.za/bluedrop; www.dwa.gov.za/greendrop