Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Similarities Both objective based Both include evaluation process Peers TabaTyler Differences Teacher Centered Hands-on approach Practical Inductive Teach.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Similarities Both objective based Both include evaluation process Peers TabaTyler Differences Teacher Centered Hands-on approach Practical Inductive Teach."— Presentation transcript:

1 Similarities Both objective based Both include evaluation process Peers TabaTyler Differences Teacher Centered Hands-on approach Practical Inductive Teach students to think Deductive Society emphasis Top Down approach Teach Students to change behavior patterns

2 Similarities Teacher Centered in design Similar approach in hands-on and discovery learning TabaBruner Differences Teacher Centered Practical Inductive Design also includes planners Spiral Lifelong learners

3 Similarities Both have teacher focus (more from Taba) Taba Wiggins & McTighe Differences Teacher Centered Practical Inductive Objectives first Hands-on Emphasis on Understanding Backward design Essential questions

4 Similarities None I can find TabaOliva Differences DesignTeacher Centered Practical Inductive Deductive Design by curriculum planners Allows for variance of goals


Download ppt "Similarities Both objective based Both include evaluation process Peers TabaTyler Differences Teacher Centered Hands-on approach Practical Inductive Teach."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google