Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAllison Howard Modified over 10 years ago
2
Why do the researchers believe this is an important study? Are acts that do not cause harm, immoral? Does if vary by context?
3
Should harmless offenses fall within the domain of moral violations? (cognitive developmental view p. 614) Theories are split Kholberg: actions that affect the material or psychological well-being of others
4
Where did the study take place? Who participated? Porto Alergro Recife Philadelphia Adults and children
5
Describe the different types of stories used in the study. Physical Harm (Swing) No harm (uniform, hand-washing) Disrespect (Flag, death promise) Disgust (eat the dog, kissing sibs, chicken)
6
Explain the manipulation checks done to adults. What did they reveal? Kissing story
7
Discuss what the authors found when they looked at how people justified the offenses? High SES: more autonomy, less community and norm Among children SES didnt matter.
8
Is it moral to eat your dog? Use the results of the study to support your position.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.