Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMadeline Fox Modified over 5 years ago
1
Designing Analog Circuits with Ultra-Low THD (<-120 dB)
Bruce E. Hofer Ex-Chairman & Co-Founder Audio Precision, Inc. (now retired)
2
Foreword This seminar is derived from my own experiences in the design of high performance and state-of-the-art test equipment over the past 48 years You will not find some of this material in textbooks Certain topics are considered proprietary and will be addressed only superficially; other topics literally beg for more research and data Any errors or misrepresentations are solely my own In many ways this seminar reflects my passion for analog circuit design, and for “getting things right”… Your feedback is welcome! A copy of this slide set is available by sending your address to
3
Introduction All too often, it is what you do not see on a schematic that really matters in achieving ultra-low distortion Clever circuit design is an important first step… However the analog design engineer must also be aware of the many forms of component imperfection and non-linearity that can limit performance Today we will focus on some of those factors Models of component non-linearity, estimation of distortion The good, the bad, and the ugly of resistors and capacitors Op-amp non-linearity Some circuit suggestions and tips
4
Taylor Series Model of Non-Linearity
Many forms of non-linearity can be modeled using a Taylor Series expansion, for example a dynamic gain: Vout = Vs * A(Vs ) = Vs * A0 * (1 + k2 * Vs + k3 * Vs ^2 …) Harmonic distortion is related to the series coefficients. If one neglects the effect of higher order terms: 2HD ratio ≈ k2 / 2HD ratio is proportional to Vs 3HD ratio ≈ k3 / 3HD ratio is proportional to Vs^2 2HD & 3HD can be estimated from the dynamic gains at the positive peak (AP), negative peak (AN), and zero crossing (A0) points of an assumed sine-wave signal 2HD ratio ≈ |AP – AN| / (8*A0) 2HD ≈ 0 if AP = AN 3HD ratio ≈ |AP + AN – 2*A0| / (24*A0)
5
Emitter Follower Example
An emitter follower was built using a MPSA18 with 4.02kΩ from emitter to -15V, and collector to +15V Task: Estimate the distortion in the output signal with a ±5 Vpk (10 Vpp) 1 kHz sine applied to the base… Assume Ta = +22C (+295K) and Vbe = 0.64V Equivalent circuit is shown on next slide The element “re” models the dynamic impedance of the transistor’s emitter-base junction at audio frequencies The 100 kΩ resistor represents the input impedance of the audio analyzer (dc coupled) that will be used to measure the actual distortion “re” interacts with the total load impedance to give a voltage gain that is slightly less than unity, and that varies as a function of the emitter current
6
Emitter Follower Circuit
Note: re = kT/qIe
7
Distortion Estimation
Dynamic emitter impedance, re ≈ kT/qIe “k” = Boltzmann’s constant = E-23 “T” ≈ 295K ignoring self heating (This is often not a good assumption!) “q” = electron charge = E-19 Calculate dynamic gains at VB = -5.0, 0.0, +5.0: VB = -5.0 V: Ie = mA, re = Ω AN = VB = V: Ie = mA, re = Ω A0 = VB = +5.0 V: Ie = mA, re = Ω AP = 2HD estimate ≈ |AP – AN| / (8*A0) = dB 3HD estimate ≈ |AP + AN - 2*A0| / (24*A0) = dB Actual measured 2HD = dB; 3HD = dB
8
Frequency Dependent Non-Linearity
Some forms of non-linearity are frequency dependent, in which case one or more of the coefficients of the Taylor Series model become functions of frequency: Vout = Vs * A0 * (1 + k2(ω) * Vs + k3(ω) * Vs ^2 …) Distortion can still be estimated from the coefficient functions k2(ω) and k3(ω) evaluated at the frequency of interest, ωo. Again, neglecting higher order terms: 2HD ratio ≈ k2(ωo) / 2 3HD ratio ≈ k3(ωo) / 4 One particularly interesting example of this type of distortion is caused by resistor thermal modulation
9
Resistor Thermal Modulation
Instantaneous changes in power dissipation do NOT cause instantaneous (or even identical) changes in temperature through-out the 3D volume of a resistor The magnitudes of temperature change within a resistor in response to an applied sine-wave signal are inherently frequency dependent A proposed model for resistor thermal modulation: R(VR, ω) = Ro * [1 + TCR * Z(ω) * (VR^2 / Ro)] Note Taylor Series form with k2(ω) = 0 and k3(ω) = TCR * Z(ω) / Ro “TCR” is the DC temperature coefficient (ppm/C) of the resistor “Z(ω)” is the device thermal impedance (C/W)…a very complex function of frequency not easily described by simple poles and zeros As ω 0 , Z(ω) θRA which is the DC thermal resistance to ambient: typically 340 C/W for a 1206 thick film resistor, or C/W for a thin-film resistor of the same size depending upon its design
10
Resistor Thermal Modulation, cont’d
At very low frequencies (typically <0.2 Hz), a resistor can approach thermal equilibrium as the signal varies 2HD ratio ≈ 0, assuming no significant DC component 3HD ratio ≈ TCR * θRA * (VR ^2 / Ro) / 4 As signal frequency increases the magnitude of Z(ω), hence 3HD, usually rolls off monotonically and drops to a negligible value above 1-2 kHz As ω ∞ , Z(ω) 0 Experiments by the author suggest |Z(20 Hz)| ≈ (25%-50%) * θRA for a 1206 surface mount resistor [more data is welcome] Other experiments by the author (corroborated by another individual) show that metal foil resistors behave very strangely, as if |Z(ω)| > θRA in the range of about Hz, before rolling off at higher frequencies TCR=100, theta=340, 20/dc = 35%, Vp=30, R=10k 3HD (20 Hz) = 270 ppm = 0.027% = dB
11
Limitations of the Taylor Series Model
The Taylor Series model generally works well with a non-linearity that monotonically increases in response to increasing signal voltage or current However several forms of non-linearity cannot be modeled with a Taylor Series: Cross-over distortion where non-linearity increases as signal decreases Contact resistance (often very bizarre with dead-band behavior) Abrupt or nearly discontinuous functions arising from clipping or slew rate limiting (think of slew rate limiting as “clipping” of the first derivative) Time varying distortions such as those occurring in compressors or AGC circuits due to non-zero attack and decay time constants Passive component voltage coefficient effects
12
Resistor Voltage Coefficient
The “voltage coefficient” of a resistor requires a very different model: R(VR) = Ro * (1 + kV* |VR|) kV has units of “ppm/V” kV is usually negative (R decreases as |VR| increases), and it is believed to be frequency independent [more data is welcome] kV has been recognized for decades in high voltage attenuator design The form of this model may look similar to a Taylor Series, but it has very different characteristics due to the dependence upon |VR| Distortion ratios can be estimated by calculating the harmonic amplitude coefficients of the FFT of a full-wave rectified sine multiplied by the sine 2HD (and all even harmonics) ≈ 0, assuming no significant DC component 3HD ratio ≈ |kV*VR|* (8/15π) Note proportionality to |VR| not VR^2 5HD ratio ≈ |kV*VR|* (8/105π) 5HD ≈ (3HD / 7) regardless of VR
13
Circuit Sensitivity to a Non-Linearity
When investigating the impact of a component non-linearity, one must also consider the sensitivity of a circuit to that component For example, a series combination of ‘N’ identical resistors reduces both thermal modulation and voltage coefficient distortion by dividing the signal amplitude Thermal modulation 3HD ratio is reduced by a factor of N^2 Voltage coefficient 3HD ratio is reduced by a factor of N Parallel combinations benefit only from the lower power in each resistor, and do nothing to reduce voltage coefficient distortion In some cases distortion cancellation may be possible Consider a voltage divider composed of identical, equal-value resistors…
14
Linear Resistor Technologies
Composition Thick Film Thin Film Axial-leaded “Metal” Film Axial-leaded “Carbon” Film (will not be covered in this seminar) Metal Foil Wire-Wound
15
Composition Resistors
The resistive element is a compacted mixture of carbon and ceramic held together in a resin base Very popular prior to the 1970s, much less popular today Still useful in some applications that require high peak power capability, or super low series inductance Unimpressive performance by today’s standards Tolerances from 20% to 5% TCR is typically 150 to 1000 ppm/C (worse at low values) High modulation noise and voltage coefficient compared to other types DO NOT USE in high performance analog designs! One notable exception is found in older guitar and musical instrument amplifiers where certain forms of distortion are actually desirable
16
Thick Film Resistors The resistive element is a conductive paste (often RuO2 plus other materials), typically 100 μm thick, applied to the surface of a cylindrical or rectangular substrate then fused at ≈850C into a glass-like film Resistance is determined by film composition and pattern Offers the greatest variety of values, sizes, and power ratings Most popular for general purpose applications today Tolerances of 5% to 0.1%, usually laser trimmed when <1% Standard TCR is 100 ppm/C increasing at value extremes Modulation noise much better than carbon composition, but still high in comparison to thin film, WW, and foil types Voltage coefficient is rarely specified; and it can vary considerably from brand to brand, lot to lot, and value…up to 10 ppm/V is not uncommon
17
Thin Film Resistors The resistive element is a more stable metallic film (e.g. Ni-Cr, Si-Cr, or Ta-N), typically 0.1 μm thick, deposited onto a cylindrical or rectangular substrate Far fewer choices of size and power ratings versus thick film The designation “metal film resistor” typically refers to an axial leaded design in which the resistive element is cut into a spiral form (helix) “Carbon film” is still a further sub-set of axial leaded resistors… Superior performance, but much more expensive Tolerances from 1% to 0.01% (usually laser trimmed) Standard TCR is typically 25, 10, 5, or even 2 ppm/C (very recently) Excellent (i.e. very low) modulation noise Voltage coefficient is usually much lower than thick film, but still rarely specified and variable from brand to brand, lot to lot, and by R value… typically in the range of 0.1 to 1 ppm/V n
18
Metal Foil Resistors The resistive element is a special metal alloy foil that is cemented to an inert substrate Resistance is determined by the foil characteristics and a cleverly designed pattern that allows trimming by opening links instead of “L” cuts Superb DC performance, but very expensive Tolerances to 0.001% with TCR as low as 0.05 ppm/C Extremely low modulation noise and thermal EMF Specified voltage coefficient is <0.1 ppm/V at DC Beware for high-end audio applications! Low frequency thermal modulation distortion in the range of Hz is typically much higher than that implied by its ultra-low TCR specification. This phenomenon is currently unexplained (perhaps due to the foil and the substrate having different thermal responses?) [more data is welcome] 18
19
Wire-Wound (WW) Resistors
Wire-wound resistors are typically used in high power applications and metrology as secondary standards The resistive element is a special alloy wire having a low TCR and wound on a physically stable substrate TCR can be vanishingly small with proper design and annealing to relieve the residual physical stress in the wire from the winding process Superb DC performance, but both large and expensive Significant parasitic shunt capacitance and series inductance, however the inductance can be minimized with dual opposed windings (Ayrton-Perry) Virtually non-existent modulation noise Usually very low voltage coefficient, but still rarely specified Can tolerate serious short term power overloads without shifting value n
20
Recommendations In my experience, the best resistor technology for most high performance analog circuits is thin-film with the lowest TCR that one can afford Avoid the more common 25 ppm/C grade in critical circuit locations such as gain setting elements…pay the premium for 10 ppm/C or 5 ppm/C [Update 2016] At least one manufacturer now offers a 2 ppm/C family For surface mount resistors, use only the 1206 size 1206 is a “sweet” spot. Smaller sizes have a lower power rating hence a higher thermal resistance which will increase thermal modulation effects. Sizes larger than 1206 are not commonly available in thin film Limit the signal across critical resistors to about mWpk or 3-5 Vpk for the lowest distortion performance Use series combinations in circuits requiring higher peak power dissipation or higher voltage (e.g. the feedback resistor in an audio power amplifier)
21
Capacitor Dielectric Materials
Polymer Film A broadly generic term covering many different types of films Ceramic Another very broadly generic term covering a wide variety of compositions and performance characteristics. Indeed, beware! Some types of ceramic capacitors are grossly non-linear, and should never be used in the signal path of high performance analog circuits Mica Glass Electrolytic (will not be covered in this seminar)
22
Polymer Films Widely available from many major vendors:
Polyester (PET, or just PE depending upon one’s age), aka Mylar® Polyphenylene-sulfide (PPS), rapidly gaining popularity as an alternative or replacement for polyester and polycarbonate with better characteristics Polystyrene (PS), very good but has a TCC of about -100 ppm/C; can be easily damaged by soldering because the film melts at +85C Polypropylene (PP), very low dissipation factor and a lower cost alternative to PS with a higher melting point (+105C); higher TCC up to -250 ppm/C Less common, typically from “boutique” vendors: Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), aka Teflon®, can be problematic due to its porosity; many audiophiles believe PTFE capacitors sound better Others: Polycarbonate (PC), once popular but virtually obsolete today; Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN), similar to polyester but better >100C; Polyimide (PI), can potentially operate in environments up to +400C 22
23
Film Capacitor Construction
Metalized Film The dielectric film is pre-coated with a conductive surface that is connected to the capacitor terminals Has higher equivalent series resistance (ESR) due to the relatively small thickness of the metallization, hence higher dissipation factor (tan θ) Metal Foil Film The dielectric film is interleaved with real metal foils that are connected to the capacitor terminals Lower ESR and dissipation factor than metalized film The nature of the electrical connection between the conductive plates of the capacitor and the external leads can result in non-linear ESR 23
24
Ceramic Capacitors There are many types of ceramic capacitors, but the only one that should ever be used in high performance analog design is “C0G” (also known as “NP0”) Available in values to >100nF with tolerances of 1-5% and voltage ratings up to 500V (up to 1kV for through-hole) TCC is ±30 ppm/C, typically <15 ppm/C better than many resistors! Low dissipation factor and frequency dependence Excellent stability, virtually immune to humidity Lower grades of ceramic caps can exhibit profound non-linearity with applied voltage…some can also be strongly piezoelectric and microphonic Examples include Z5U, Y5Y, and Hi-K® 24
25
Mica Capacitors Mica capacitors were once highly regarded for analog design in the past…but much less so today… Still commonly available with 1-5% tolerances in values up to 10,000 pF TCC varies by brand and value, usually around +90 ppm/C Relatively stable, however the typical epoxy coating is very easy to fracture near the leads allowing moisture intrusion during board wash or long term exposure to high humidity (caps so affected behave very strangely) Potentially abrupt small shifts in value when exposed to vibration or shock Unfortunately mica is a product of nature, some of its better sources have been depleted With the widespread availability and lower guaranteed TCC of C0G (NP0) ceramic caps, there are very few reasons to specify a mica capacitor anymore 25
26
Glass Capacitors Glass is relatively inert and potentially one of the most stable of all capacitor dielectrics Values commonly available up to 2,200 pF (some vendors to 100,000 pF) Extremely stable, almost no aging, near zero voltage coefficient Some sensitivity to frequency, perhaps a bit worse than “NP0” ceramics and polypropylene (PP) film capacitors [more data is welcome] Curiously, TCC is not as good as other types: typically +140 ppm/C Highest immunity to radiation—obvious uses in military and aerospace applications (and perhaps the best choice for the survivalist golden-ears preparing for the post-apocalyptic world…) Unfortunately molten glass is not so easy to form with precise dimensions 5% tolerance typical, 1-2% available but much more expensive 26
27
Non-Linearity of Capacitors
A complex, fascinating, and often neglected subject… Capacitors can also have a voltage coefficient effect The E-field between the capacitor plates will cause a compressive force on the dielectric that can modulate its thickness (especially non-rigid films) Unlike resistors, the voltage coefficient is usually positive A good design practice is to avoid peak signal levels that are greater than about 5-10% of the capacitor’s voltage rating As mentioned earlier, film capacitors can also have a nasty form of non-linearity related to signal current The metalized surfaces or foils of a film capacitor are often electrically connected to the external leads via physical crimping, not welding The resulting contact resistance (ESR) can be non-linear causing unwanted distortion voltages in series with the capacitor 27
28
An Interesting Distortion Comparison
Audio Precision recently replaced a custom 333 nF PP-Foil tubular capacitor with a module containing multiple 100V C0G ceramic caps wired in parallel 28
29
An Interesting Distortion Comparison
The following data was taken at 15 Hz and 5.30 Vac for 9 random samples: Original PP-Foil Design Multiple 100V C0G Ceramic HD HD HD 3HD dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB _________ _________ _________ _________ μ = μ = μ = μ = σ = σ = σ = σ = 4.50 29
30
Op-Amps, The Traditional Categories
Precision Optimized for low DC offset and bias current. Older designs tended to be slow with a very low slew rate, some were “chopper” stabilized… General Purpose Often dominant-pole compensated and stable under unity gain situations. Slew rates tend to be in the range of 4-20 V/μs. Many newer designs insert a pole-zero pair into the open loop response to increase GBW High Speed Not necessarily stable under unity gain situations. Slew rates tend to be >20 V/μs. Op-amps optimized for ultra-low noise and distortion tend to fall more into this category Really High Speed Optimized for video signal processing and specialized signal generation
31
Op-Amps, A More Useful Classification
Advances in IC processes and circuit techniques now strongly blur these traditional categories Indeed, there are a number of op-amps that feature the combination of excellent DC performance, decent slew rate and GBW characteristics, low noise, and low non-linear distortion…examples include the OPA1611/12, OPA1641/42, OPA827, and LT1468 My apologies if your own favorite op-amp is not in this list… A much more useful op-amp distinction is the input device technology: Bipolar vs. JFET Both can offer input voltage offset performance to <200 μV However, JFET op-amps have near-zero input bias current Bipolar op-amps still have the lowest input noise voltage performance, although some current JFET designs rival older classic bipolar designs
32
Op-Amp Distortion Mechanisms
Input stage trans-conductance non-linearity ΔIinput = Ccomp * d/dt(Vout) in a dominant pole design Input stage common mode impedance non-linearity Junction capacitance variation with signal voltage, JFETs are worse Input stage offset voltage modulation Unequal thermal coupling from the output stage to the input device pair Output stage non-linearity, crossover non-linearity Non-linear power supply currents (often overlooked!) Mutual inductance between power supply connections and critical circuit loops can be a significant distortion contributor (Faraday’s Law) Imperfect power supply rejection (PSRR) of non-linear ripple voltages 32
33
Some Distortion Reduction “Tricks”
Output stage non-linearity can often be significantly reduced by forcing the output to behave more like a class-A amplifier by adding a resistor or a biasing dc current source to one of the supplies Watch out for increased power dissipation in the op-amp! Op-amps needing an external compensation capacitor can usually benefit from either “2-pole” compensation or “feed-forward” compensation Instead of using the classic 22 pF between pins 5-8 of a NE5534, use a pair of 47 pF connected in series with a 499-1k resistor connected between the two capacitors and the positive supply For inverting NE5534 configurations, try connecting a capacitor having a value of about pF between the input and pin 8 33
34
Two-Pole Compensation
35
“Feed-Forward”
36
More Tips to Minimize Op-Amp Distortion
Use inverting topologies whenever possible Input capacitance modulation effects can be very significant with common mode signals in a non-inverting configuration Most op-amps will show dramatically lower THD (particularly 2HD above 5 kHz) when operated with a gain of -1 versus +1. If an op-amp must be used in a non-inverting topology (e.g. a Sallen-Key active low-pass filter), arrange for both inputs to “feel” the same source impedance This usually means adding a complicated RC network in series with the input to match the impedance seen looking outward from the +input Slight noise penalty due to extra resistive elements Distortion reduction can be surprisingly significant! 36
37
Common-Mode Distortion Cancellation
38
Which Op-Amp is Best for Ultra-Low THD?
NONE! Although some can deliver -120 dB THD at 1 kHz, none can maintain that level of performance up through 20 kHz or higher frequencies The solution is to think “outside of the box” and not be limited to just a single op-amp! Consider a 2 op-amp cascade topology: the first op-amp selected for its input characteristics, the second selected for speed and high slew rate Stability is an obvious concern, but it can be done… Indeed, this circuit topology is used extensively in the state-of-the-art Audio Precision APx555 audio test system (introduced in late 2014) Unfortunately our discussion of the 2 op-amp cascade topology and some of its design considerations must end at this point due to IP issues…
39
In Conclusion… Today we have examined some of the design factors responsible for distortion in analog circuits As you have seen, the analog design engineer must contend with real-world components having many forms of imperfection and non-linearity that can significantly limit THD Hopefully I have also shown you that analog design engineering can be both an exciting and challenging career…especially at the cutting edge of performance Questions, comments, slide set:
40
Designing Analog Circuits with Ultra-Low THD (<-120 dB)
Bruce E. Hofer Ex-Chairman & Co-Founder Audio Precision, Inc. (now retired)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.