1. College Community School District Ten-Year Strategic Plan
School Board Report
August 19, 2019
What’s New for ?
Doug

2. Agenda Ten-Year Strategic Plan: Year 6 Personalized Learning at CCSD
Professional Learning for the School Year
New Teacher Orientation
Workshop Week
Doug

3. 10-Year Strategic Plan Update
Laura

4. Revision Input
Lorem 1
Throughout the school year, Oversight Team members and all administrators had the option of completing a Google Form to suggest additions, deletions, and revisions.
Feedback Form
SIAC
Lorem 2
The School Improvement Advisory Committee (SIAC) met in April to review the current strategic plan and provide feedback for the year ahead.
Oversight
Lorem 3
The CCSD Oversight Team met in April. Participants heard updates from several teams and program leaders. Based on those updates and their experiences as leaders within their schools, Oversight Team members suggested feedback for all areas of the Strategic Plan.
Laura

5. Layout and Format
The title of “Strategic Plan” to “10 Year Strategic Plan”
Current calendar year included, as well as “Year 6”
“Our ten-year goal is to create a personalized learning system built on a guaranteed and viable curriculum and strong multi-tiered system of supports for students.”
New timeline graphic
Goals together, not tied to specific focus area
Laura

6. Focus One
Implement a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) for academic, social, emotional, behavior, and mental health (SEBMH), with a focus on identifying and developing essential practices in the Universal Tier.
Engage in the SAMI process at the building level to strengthen MTSS
Establish school-based Accessible Educational Materials (AEM) leadership teams.
Laura

7. Focus Two
Implement a guaranteed and viable curriculum, effective instruction aligned to the Iowa Core and the Iowa Early Learning Standards, and standards-based grading practices.
Accelerate the development of healthy, productive, and effective PLCs by leveraging leadership and resources.
Gather and analyze baseline data for new state measurements including ISASP and the Conditions for Learning Survey.
Laura

8. Focus Three (military included within “career”)
Develop outcomes, timelines, structures, supports, and leadership capacity as we move toward a personalized learning environment that is engaging, equitable, and empowering.
Research and select an Instructional Framework for use in the school year.
Maintain a minimum of 30% IPI-T observations receiving a score of 5 or 6 to ensure students are engaged in higher-order, deeper thinking.
Establish indicators and competencies for college, career, and future readiness.
Laura

9. Focus Four
Articulate systems that provide equitable access to college and career readiness knowledge, skills, and opportunities.
Continue to engage our District and Community Leadership Team to collaboratively develop a continuum of mental health supports for all.
Laura

10. Other changes:
We are able to maintain these efforts without specific reference in the Strategic Plan
Create environments and conditions where the Habits of Success are an integral part of teaching and learning.
Include community and parent representatives in building and district-level teams focused on continuous improvement.
Laura

11. A. By June of 2020, 80% of PK-12 students will achieve a Meeting or Exemplary level on their initial attempt on District Common Assessments (DCAs) in literacy and math, indicating the impact of universal instruction.
B. By June of 2020, 60% of students in grades will meet the typical growth score on the Measures of Academic Progress from fall to spring in math and reading. (Average percentage of students meeting typical growth nationally is 50%)
Goals
Laura

12. Goals
E. By June of 2020, 85% of students or more will have 0-1 discipline referrals, fewer than 10% of students will have 2-5 discipline referrals and fewer than 5% of students will have 6 or more referrals.
F. By June of 2020, maintain or increase our overall attendance rate of 95.6% and decrease the number of students who are chronically absent by 3%.
Laura

13. Goals
G. By January of 2020, increase the percent of students in grades 5-12 who respond favorably to the Gallup Student Poll in two areas, Hope and Engagement, by .2% (This a statistically significant increase for this poll.)
I. By June of 2020, we will continue to increase our “Onpoint” score from 629 to 650 points, indicating our progress towards the development of a personalized learning system.
Laura

14. Goals
K. In response to initial data from the School Perceptions Survey, we will continue to improve school safety procedures and apply effective strategies to prevent and respond to challenging behavior.
L. In response to initial data from the School Perceptions Survey, we will prioritize initiatives to build coherence, connection, and understanding for staff.
Laura

15. Personalized Learning Update
Tracy

16. Tracy

17. 2018 OnPoint Score Report
3a. By June of 2019, we will increase our “Onpoint” score from 590 to 650 points. This score is an indicator of progress towards the development of a personalized learning system.
Tracy

18. How is the score calculated, are some elements weighted more than others, what does 590 mean?
Calculation - The Onpoint score is generated based on responses to survey questions. The survey questions are aligned to our Personalized Learning Implementation Framework, with 2 questions aligned to each of the 5 categories of the framework plus four questions aligned to a 6th category called “Culture of Innovation”. We calculate a score for each of the 6 categories, and average those 6 subscores to arrive at the overall score. Each survey question is scored on a 5 point scale according to the 5 answer choices, which is converted to a number out of For instance, a question which scores a 3.2 would equal 640 when scored out of 1000.
Weighting - Teacher and leader survey responses are each weighted equally to determine the score. Categories are also weighted equally.
What does 590 Mean? - The score is essentially an average of the 6 subscores (i.e., the average score for each category). That said, since Onpoint is a benchmark score, part of its meaning stems from how your district scores in relation to other districts at the same phase of implementation (in College Community’s case, you all were in the “Planning” phase). So, the benchmark for districts in the “Planning” phase (based on the average of all other “Planning” phase districts and schools that EE has worked with) is 561, whereas as College Community’s score was So, it scored above the benchmark for districts and schools in the “Planning” phase. The idea is to help you understand how your district is performing compared to others in a similar stage of implementation.
Tracy

19. Tracy

20. 2019 Onpoint Score Report
"College Community's 2019 Onpoint score is among the highest we have seen for schools in the planning phase of their personalized learning implementations. It exceeds the benchmark scores for nearly all of the subcategories, is well above where most districts typically score in the planning phase and shows tremendous growth from 2018 to This growth is a testament to the work the College Community team has done to define a clear purpose and roadmap for personalized learning."
~Justin de Leon, Education Elements
Tracy

22. Professional Learning Update

23. 19-20 New Teacher Orientation Schedule
Doug

24. 19-20 Staff Workshop Schedule
Doug

25. 19-20 Professional Learning Day Schedule
Doug

26. Questions

27. Thank You