1. Tdw12 – user feedback survey
YOUR FEEDBACK
Tdw12 – user feedback survey

2. A. COMMON DATA ISSUES Slow internet speed / constant dropouts
Takes long time to sync and upload attachments
Issues related to Logsheet
Errors in logsheet after entering
Fixing errors time consuming
Incomplete logsheet / missing pages
Logsheet not attached on T2 for verification
Issues with Data validation
Unable to validate if iFIMIS data imported into T2
Data validation time consuming

3. A. Common Issues: Suggestions
Regular communication with SPC and Users of T2
SPC to check on all T2 users on issues faced on a quarterly basis to avoid practical issues and update Tufman 2 accordingly and more user friendly where possible.
SPC should advice on what to do when the error of logging in to Tufman 2.
If possible all Observer name and their respective codes
Logsheet
SPC format need to be revised
Data validation
Data Validation should be for responsible countries to which vessels are licensed to, while SPC could only provide a reminder to notice for parties to validate timely.
Remove or delete the iFIMS trip and just enter into T2 using Logsheet so that it can appear in Dorado reporting

4. B. DATA SHARING 43% 57% Some countries (e.g. Fiji) data unavailable
Responded NO
They either have access to all the data they need from T2
43%
Responded YES
They need some data both flagged or coastal state but are not able to access
Some countries (e.g. Fiji) data unavailable
Vessels do not send the required data

5. B. Suggestions
Better communication between member countries facilitated by SPC
Agreement with the heads of Fisheries with member countries specifically, on data sharing.
Penalties
Some form of penalty for not sharing data

6. C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

7. C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

8. C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

9. C. CHARTER ARRANGEMENTS

10. D. DORADO

11. D. DORADO

12. 17. Features or functions participants use the most
Use for Part 1 Reporting function
Catch and effort geographic function
Tuna catch and effort
Features
Position Report monthly summary
Vessel cost and catch to generate monthly fuel subsidy
National catch estimates

13. 18. Features or functions participants like the most
Use for Part 1 Reporting function
Catch and effort geographic function
Tuna catch and effort
Features
Position Report monthly summary
Vessel cost and catch to generate monthly fuel subsidy
National catch estimates
ALL features
Long line recon

14. 19. Features or function participated would like improved or added
Function to report on transshipment data
The Mapping
Overlaps and repetition needs further cleaning
Search button
Field for validation in reporting to see how many countries have shared data
Chart on more reports

15. 20. Actions that takes the longest time to complete

16. 21. Actions need less time consuming
Finding reports and checking data
Exporting to right format
Creating summaries
Math with data, filtering data table
Error fixing

17. 22. Actions need the most improvement
Creating summaries
Data visualization (graphs, maps,etc)
Checking data and finding reports
Filtering data tables
Addressing fix or errors in logsheets

18. E. GENERAL FEEDBACK
23. What participants like most or least about TUFMAN 2
Most Like
Easy to use
Web-based so you can access from anywhere anytime
Lets you know where errors are
Easy to find information and do validations
Least Like
Slow internet and server errors
Takes long time to load
Some errors take long time to fix

19. 24. What participants like most or least about TAILS
Most Like
Helps in artisanal data collection
Web-based so you can access from anywhere anytime
Paperless auto-calculations
Faster process of getting artisanal data to Tufman2
Least Like
Slow internet and server errors
Too slow for port sampling
Some errors take long time to fix

20. 25. Usefulness of SLACK

21. 26. Suggestions on improvement
Make regular visit to countries
Train countries to handle some errors by themselves