Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MQXF PD and Break Down Test Campaign

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MQXF PD and Break Down Test Campaign"— Presentation transcript:

1 MQXF PD and Break Down Test Campaign
Jan Petrik TE-MSC LMF With thanks to: Pierre-Antoine Contant, Paolo Ferracin 20/03/2019

2 Partial discharge Occurs when high enough excitation voltage(for given insulation system) is present Represents miniature failures in insulation (bubbles, voids, discharges..) Can accumulate over time and result in failure Requirement for PD free insulation in power transformers and other expensive equipment which are subjected continuous AC excitation – not our case Very sensitive Good for relative comparison Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 2

3 Partial Discharge AC Filter PD Detector DUT Jan Petrik, 11/01/2019

4 What we evaluated PD inception voltage PD vs voltage PD pattern Tricky
Comparison based Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 4

5 Limits We do not have bare coil Where are the limits of used cables?
QH contains Voltage taps traces Cables We measure everything together Where are the limits of used cables? Quick test with separate cable V Single test, let’s assume that above 1300V we are not sure… Distinctive PD pattern If PD activity was low, we’ve kept increasing test voltage, in 3 cases the coil DP pattern was swamped by cables Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

6 Sample size 33 QH 9 coils MQXFS3: 105, 106, 107, LARP 8
207 – virgin coil Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

7 PD Inception Voltage - [ACV]
Overall Results Assembly Coil Side Field PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] MQXFS3 LARP 8 Right High 559 Virgin 207 Low 1000 MQXFS5 206 619 Left 1011 204 821 205 1022 106 837 107 1053 850 105 1055 853 203 1069 902 1072 922 1086 929 1096 960 1136 961 1139 976 1150 980 1218 986 1234 992 1238 1342 1349 107 Right-High – QH already shorted Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

8 PD Inception Voltage - [ACV]
Results Per Coil PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] Coil QH Count Avg Min Max STD Larp 8 4 559 1349 206 3 619 1000 204 937 821 986 106 837 1150 207 928.5 850 1011 107 1017 902 1096 205 1099 922 1234 203 1027.5 929 1136 105 992 1342 Due to RH QH Virgin Coil Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

9 PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] PD Inception Voltage - [ACV]
Results per QH PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] QH QH Count Avg Min Max STD All QH 33 559 1349 High Field only 16 1342 Low Field Only 17 961 Left Side only 853 Right side only 1218 Left & High only 8 1046.5 Left & Low only 980 Right & High only 992 Right & Low only 9 And per Assembly PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] Assembly QH Count Avg Min Max STD MQXFS3 14 559 1349 MQXFS5 15 619 1234 Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

10 PD Results The Worst 10 – all are High field QH
7 out of 10 – Right side, High field QH Right side, high field is the worst QH for 8 out of 9 coils…#107 – RH QH was already busted… Virgin coil (#207) is comparable with others This would indicate (= not conclusive!!) that there is no damage during assembly and cold testing To be sure we would need to measure #207 after cold testing. Pattern analysis – yet to be done Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 10

11 Breakdown Tests Tests 5 coils 20QHs – 3 already damaged
Break down test – ramp 1kV/min Burn mode – Step, 500V increase Capacitive discharge to do more damage 5 coils 105, 106, 107, LARP 8, 206 20QHs – 3 already damaged Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 11

12 Splice issue Issue in insulation of cable splice
Effect of cold testing Coil #105 and #106 Might have influenced PD measurements PD inception voltage quite away from breakdown – all but #105LH Assembly Coil Side Field PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] Inception Voltage – Peak [V] Ramp Test Breakdown [DCV] MQXFS3 105 Left High 1342 1961 Low 1086 4850 Right 992 4521 1055 2223 106 1072 5567 1150 2297 837 2137 Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 12

13 PD Inception Voltage - [ACV]
Breakdown results Coil Side Field PD Inception Voltage - [ACV] IR [GΩ] 25V/30s Ramp Burn Test Passed 105 Left High 1342 >33.8 1961 10kV Low 1086 4850 Right 992 4521 6kV 1055 2223 106 1072 5567 1150 >34 2297 837 2137 8kV 107 1053 8720 902 >10kV 1096 7201 7.5kV 206 960 1803 2kV 1000 N/A 619 5287 LARP 8 1238 1349 6878 559 9.2 737 1139 Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

14 Breakdown - Preliminary Results
20QH – 3 already damaged – 17 QH to be tested 9 (10) reached 10kV with no BD (Burn test) 5 better than 5kV 2 very weak 2 shorts through neighbouring QH !! Fast ramp(burn mode) gives better results than 1kV/min ramp Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 14

15 Suggestions Better routing of signals Distances on QH (QH/QH,QH/VT)
Cable bundles – Different bundles ? Cable reliefs are missing Measurement suggestions Bare QH #207 After cold testing Coverlay for QH trace – reduce possibility of surface discharge in case of delamination/resin cracks Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 15

16 Extra Slides Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019 16

17 Jan Petrik, 20/03/2019

18 MQXFS5 Coil 203, 204, 205, 206 3 thermal cycles ~50 quenches
Paolo Ferracin

19 MQXFS3 Coil 105, 105, 107 Coil 8 5 thermal cycles 1 full disassembly
~100 quenches Coil 8 2 thermal cycles ~50 quenches Paolo Ferracin


Download ppt "MQXF PD and Break Down Test Campaign"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google