1. CMGC Overview SLAC Site Plan Systems Description Construction Schedule
Cost Estimate
ES&H
CMGC SOW
Summary

2. SLAC Site Plan SLAC Main Gate Pep Ring Road Bldg #081 - MMF Sector 25
Sector 20 Upstream
LCLS General Work Boundary
Research Yard

3. LCLS Site Plan Spear Future Office Space Pep Ring Road SLC
Legend
Baseline
Future
LCLS Site Plan
Spear
Future
Office Space
Pep Ring Road
SLC
Office Complex
Undulator Hall
Research Yard
Survey Tower
NEH
Beam
Transport
Hall
SLC Tunnel
Beam Dump
Front End
Enclosure
Future
Beam Lines
X-Ray Transport
Pep Tunnel

4. LCLS CF Systems Description
Includes a composition of renovations to existing SLAC infrastructure and new facilities for CMGC
Research Yard Modifications
Beam Transport Hall
Undulator Hall
Electron Beam Dump
Front End Enclosure
Near Experimental Hall
X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel
Far Experimental Hall
Central Lab Office Complex

5. New Facilities
Beam Transport Hall – 227m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY
Undulator Hall – 175m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment
Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists
Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space
Electron Beam Dump – 40m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams
Front End Enclosure – 30m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam
Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops
X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH

6. Below Grade Plan FEE Beam Dump Near Hall/CLOC
Beam Transport Hall (at grade)
Undulator Hall
XRTDT
Far Hall
FG ~ 360’
FG ~ 320’
FG ~ 280’
FG ~ 245’

7. LCLS CF Construction Schedule
LEGEND
TI Design
TII Design
Preconstruction
Construction
Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration
Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces
Site-work at NEH is key!
Increased duration of CM/GC procurement phase
DOE SO approval for CM/GC SOW – (in progress)

8. WBS 1.09 TEC (BCWS x FY) $76.7M Construction Start Mar 06
LLP – S20, MMF, CMGC Phase 1

9. ES & H Risks
Construction Safety – Is not a priority, but a VALUE! (priorities change from time to time, values remain consistent over time)
All construction activities shall comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes
Subcontractor activities
In-house activities
LCLS will approve GC construction safety program prior to any start of construction activities
Unique considerations to normal day-to-day construction projects at SLAC
Tunnel construction
Excavations
Subsurface construction
Weak ground conditions
Naturally occurring asbestos
Elevated work
Heavy equipment
Congested work areas (RSY)

10. CM/GC Plan
SOW for CM/GC (LLP) has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project
Reviewed by SLAC DOE SO
Final comments updated and sent to proof reader for final corrections
Once approved by SLAC DOE SO, plan will be submitted to DOE HQ for approval (Chicago → DC)
With blanket approval, there will not be a need to return for multiple approvals for bid packages

11. CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved
Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb
Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved
Meeting planned milestones are crucial!

12. CM/GC Plan – cont’d
CM/GC services will be solicited with an award based on a best-value firm fixed price contract
Phase 1 – preconstruction services
Phase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings
Anticipating CM/GC award for Sept 05
CM/GC qualifications – partial list
Technical competence
Similar previous experience
Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors
Financial strength

13. CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record
Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <.81
EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are considered average among their industry group
EMR > 1.0 indicated that the company files more claims than other similar companies
EMR<0.81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than other similar companies
Injury frequency and severity rates
Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel
OSHA citation history
References from previous projects
Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices
LCLS has decided to place all contractors working on projects to have an EMR of <.81, go no-go

14. Summary
SOW completed and is currently being reviewed (with RFP package) in collaboration with SLAC DOE SO, SLAC and LCLS project team
Comments incorporated
Complete CMGC package (RFP, SOW, T&C’s, etc) under review by technical writer
DOE approval milestones are critical!
CM services (interim phase) scheduled to commence in collaboration with 30% design review
Cost validation
Schedule review
Constructability review
Value Engineering

15. End of Presentation