Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Permanent vs. Mobile HHW Collection: A Comparison Dan Miller, Operations Supervisor Quinte Waste Solutions.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Permanent vs. Mobile HHW Collection: A Comparison Dan Miller, Operations Supervisor Quinte Waste Solutions."— Presentation transcript:

1 Permanent vs. Mobile HHW Collection: A Comparison Dan Miller, Operations Supervisor Quinte Waste Solutions

2 Who We Are Centre and South Hastings Waste Services Board
Curbside/Commercial Recycling Household Hazardous Waste Electronic Waste Nine member municipalities

3 Belleville Depot Open Year Round Seasonally Changing Hours
Traffic Loop System Collect a variety of materials at one location

4 Mobile Collection Program
19 Collection events per season Saturdays between April- October 9 Different locations 1-4 Events per location Available to any member municipality Mobile containment berm used

5 Participation Belleville Depot
2016 – 9,012 attendees/ 808 operating hours (11/hr) 2017 – 11,006 attendees/ 879 operating hours (12/hr) 2018 – 11,894 attendees/ 879 operating hours (13/hr) Mobile Collection Program 2016 – 2903 attendees/ 95 operating hours (30/hr) 2017 – 1951 attendees/ 95 operating hours (20/hr) 2018 – 1961 attendees/ 90 operating hours (21/hr)

6 Capture Rates Belleville Depot
2016 – 307 metric tonnes/ 808 operating hours (0.38mt/hr) 2017 – 273 metric tonnes/ 879 operating hours (0.31mt/hr) 2018 – 306 metric tonnes/ 879 operating hours (0.35mt/hr) Mobile Collection Program 2016 – 66 metric tonnes/95 operating hours (0.69mt/hr) 2017 – 62 metric tonnes/95 operating hours (0.65mt/hr) 2018 – 59 metric tonnes/90 operating hours (0.65mt/hr)

7 Belleville Depot: Opportunities and Obstacles
Best annual material capture rate Best annual attendance More regular hours Fewer staff required Familiar to residents Storage space Efficiency Obstacles: Maintenance costs Higher annual staff cost Utilities/rental costs PPE costs Not convenient for entire service area

8 Mobile Collection Program: Opportunities and Obstacles
Best capture rate per hour Best attendance vs operating hours Improved access to smaller municipalities Can add event locations Diverting material that would not be captured Outreach and Education Presence and environmental awareness Obstacles: Cost per hour Impacted by weather Limited collection capacity Limited collection variety Increased risk and liability: Spills during transport Injury during loading/unloading

9 Summary

10 Questions? Dan Miller, Operations Supervisor Quinte Waste Solutions


Download ppt "Permanent vs. Mobile HHW Collection: A Comparison Dan Miller, Operations Supervisor Quinte Waste Solutions."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google