Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Information literacy activities at the University Campus Library

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Information literacy activities at the University Campus Library"— Presentation transcript:

1 Information literacy activities at the University Campus Library

2 Compulsory and optional courses for FSpS and FM
Our IL activities Compulsory and optional courses for FSpS and FM F2F for midwifery and paramedic Blended learning for PhD students E-learning for bachelory and master degree students Trainings for users from the campus Each semester lessons on various topics Cooperation on university teachers‘ lessons

3 The courses contents Searching in EIR (discovery.muni, WoS, Scopus, PubMed) Publication and citation ethics, citing Zotero Bibliometrics (impact factor, SJR, SNIP, h-index) Predatory journals ORCID, ResearcherID, Open Access

4 The need of developing PhD students‘ information literacy skills:
Why the courses exists? The need of developing PhD students‘ information literacy skills: Searching scientific informations Evaluation of information sources Scientific writing and citing Publishing in high-quality journals

5 Evaluation of teaching efficiency due to the time spent by teaching/tutoring
Continously counting number of minutes spent by any process (checking homeworks, responding etc.) in terms spring and autumn 2015 Comparison of an average and a percentage of a time spent by processes

6 Evaluation of teaching efficiency due to the time spent by teaching/tutoring
Processes F2F (block teaching) E-learning spring 2015 autumn 2015 Contact teaching 635,0 490,0 0,0 Preparing an interactive syllabi 53,0 97,5 44,0 99,0 Preparing tests 15,5 12,0 7,0 11,5 Checking tasks 480,0 552,0 416,0 632,5 Preparing study materials 13,0 Preparing information about the courses at the websites 97,0 15,0 Preparing tasks 4,0 14,0 34,0 Communication with students 149,5 115,5 218,0 175,5 TOTAL MINUTES 1 337,0 1 377,0 699,0 967,5 TOTAL HOURS 22hrs 20mins 22hrs 55mins 11hrs 40mins 16hrs 10mins Number of students 22 21 12 17 Average number of minutes on each student 58 57

7 Evaluation of teaching efficiency due to the time spent by teaching/tutoring

8 Organization of the course
Interactive syllabi Various types of study materials Practical tasks Evaluation

9 Interactive syllabi

10 Various types of study materials
Animations? Never more! To make text more attractive Progressive bar with chapters

11 Practical tasks - Searching
Defining keywords Using Boolean operators Personal feedback

12 Practical tasks – Checking an availability of a text
Checking an online availability of a journal Using a link service

13 Practical tasks – Writing and citing
Difference between annotation and abstract All corrections made directly in a task

14 Practical tasks – Writing and citing
Difference between annotation and abstract Students are requested to read Author instructions and cite according them Colors help to identify a file with scanned publication that is to cite

15 Practical tasks – Writing and citing
Difference between annotation and abstract Students are requested to read Author instructions and cite according them Citation specifics need to be explained

16 Practical tasks – Gaining bibliometric values

17 Practical tasks – Predatory journals
Comments confirming or contradicting a student´s finding Students repeatedly evaluate (non)indexing of a journal in Web of Science, Scopus and DOAJ

18 Measuring the impact of teaching on PhD students‘ knowledge
Measuring based on pre-tests and post-tests Same pre-tests/post-tests for F2F and e-learning (since 2016 only blended learning) Comparison of only results from students with completed both tests Detecting the percentage difference between the number of people who correctly answered question

19

20

21

22 Evaluation of PhD student´s satisfaction with courses
Survey in Google Docs (closed and Likert scale questions, comments) Each semester evaluation Negativ - a low return of surveys

23

24

25

26

27 Comments and corrections in tasks on references and predatory journals were evaluated individually.
All tasks, instructions, evaluation etc. were detailed. A teacher reminded to all of us and cared for us as his own. A greatly-prepared interactive syllabi with the ability to visit a particular lesson is the best combination. I also appreciate video presentations.

28 Best practice

29 Organizace

30 Organization Quick overview Personal approach

31 Communication – Reminder only on demand

32 Prevent unnecessary errors
Efektivita předmětů informační gramotnosti pro doktorandy Lékařské fakulty MU / Knihovna univerzitního kampusu MU

33 References training via Google Docs
Tailor-made exercises (AMA, ACS, NLM etc.) Corrections displayed to everyone Possible alerting on errors during exercise Laptops or tablets are the most suitable

34 Make a lesson fresh with online exercise
In F2F students shy Anonymously more active

35 Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "Information literacy activities at the University Campus Library"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google