1. 2017-2018 Texas Academic Performance Report
Department of Performance and Planning Dr. Dorian Galindo

2. TEA’s Guidelines Annual Report:
Student Performance in Postsecondary Institutions
PDF TAPR
PEIMS Financial Standard Reports
Public Hearing(s)
District Accreditation Status
Access to the PDF TAPR
Campus Performance Objectives (CIPs)
Publishing the Report
Requirement for Notice on District Website
SPED Determination Status
Report on Violent or Criminal Incidents
Recommended Meetings
Recommended Meetings Beyond the requirement to widely publish the district annual report and PDF TAPR, a superintendent may encourage principals to meet with staff to discuss their campus report and, following public discussion, schedule presentations of the information at meetings of local parent-teacher organizations.

3. How to get to the webpage:

4. For more information Contact:
Dr. Dorian Galindo, Director of Performance and Planning or
TAPR District and Campus Reports are located online at or
The information desk at: Lobby of Richard A. Middleton Education Center

5. Campus Instructional Improvement Plan 2018 – 2019
Updating Plans

6. Updating Formative Checks in CIIPs
Board Goals
Target Areas
Measureable Evaluation Criteria (Summative)
Performance Objectives / Strategies
Formative Check Point(s)
Timeline /
Responsible Person(s)
Cost / Resources
List #’s addressed separated by “, “
Subject, area of focus
Summative in nature (using state assessment whenever possible) – specific number/goal must be included.
Be sure that indicator directly relates to the performance objective/goal listed.
Must have –
Objective that will address the area of focus and needs assessment followed by a connecting word such as “by”, “through”, etc and then strategy/strategies to reach that goal/objective.
How will you check/monitor progress towards your goal?
Month year – Month year
Titles only (no names)
If no funds are needed, leave blank or type n/a
Check Point
Dec
Feb
The district and campus templates has been adjusted to include a place for formative check points.
The measureable criteria (how you will measure success), has been moved to the beginning after target areas.
The timeline has been combined with the responsible person to make room for the formative check points. You can use any available data to measure progress towards your summative goal and you can adjust the months to meet your needs.
In the past we have discouraged benchmarks, lesson plans, walk through as a summative measure of progress. Now you can use those in the formative column to monitor progress.

7. Clarify the meanings of the formative check options currently available on the 2018-19 CIIPs.
üá for Exceeded Expectations
ü for Met Expectations
û Did Not Meet Expectations

8. For the remainder of this year -
üá for Exceeded Expectations
(Means: completed the formative check and progress exceeds expectations for this point in the year)
ü for Met Expectations
(Means: completed the formative check and making progress towards goals)
û Did Not Meet Expectations
(Means: did not complete the formative check and/or did not make expected progress towards goals)
For the CIIPs we can change the wording of the formative checks -

9. If you have any suggestions for these please email BranDe Merriman
ü for Exceeded Expectations
(Means: completed the formative check and progress exceeds expectations for this point in the year)
üá for Met Expectations
(Means: completed the formative check and met expected goals for this time of the year)
ü for Progressing
(Means: completed the formative check and progressing towards goals)
û Did Not Meet Expectations
(Means: did not complete the formative check or did not make any progress towards goals)
If you have any suggestions for these please BranDe Merriman

10. QUESTIONS!

11. Interim Assessment Training 2018-2019 THEN and NOW
October 2018
Interim Assessments
THEN and NOW
NEISD Testing Services 11

12. THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW
Pilot Program
Available to all tested grade levels
Spanish items
Multiple attempts
Known format
Reliability of questions
Additional Embedded Supports (besides TTS)
Predictability for STAAR performance
Pilot Program
Available to all tested grade levels
Spanish items
Multiple attempts
Known format
Reliability Questions
Additional Embedded Supports (besides TTS)
Predictability for STAAR performance
Last year's interim assessments predicted the student's score correctly about 79-87% of the time.
When the prediction was incorrect, the student scored better than predicted 84% of the time.

13. Inform teachers of the options
What is Next?
Inform teachers of the options
Opportunity 1 is still available
Opportunity 2 opens today
Some teachers may be considering a Mock STAAR type assessment after the 2nd benchmark. Since they have had access to the STAAR items in Aware all year, perhaps this may be another option.
CTC’s have been trained
QUESTIONS?

14. Optional Afternoon Breakout Sessions
Eduphoria Aware Data Debrief Session Part A
Provide how-to files for
Locating the data needed for benchmark protocols
accessing quick views
creating customized student learning reports
populating performance and progress template
Creating and managing monitor groups
Eduphoria Aware Data Debrief Session Part B
WORK SESSION (As Requested)
Support on any of the above
Principal choice data
Schedule campus support