Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018

Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018
GCS State of the Arts 2018 Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018

Mission Guilford county students will graduate as responsible citizens prepared to succeed in higher education, or in the career of their choice.* *This mission was adopted by the Guilford County Board of Education on December 12, 2000. Vision ACHIEVING EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE

Where Are We Going? Summer Planning Committee
Arts Master Plan 2022 Development Improving Internal Communication PDAE Grant Board of Education Presentation October 2017 Marketing Expansion Surveys, Data Collection, Analysis Annual Report Staging for Future Grants and Awards Advocacy

Arts Master Plan 2022 Policy Goal I Professional Development Goal II
Create and improve district policies to better support education of the whole child and ensure access to a robust and world-class arts education. Professional Development Goal II Ensure arts educators are provided relevant, authentic, and current professional development while establishing arts-specific training opportunities for non-arts educators and administrators. Community Engagement Goal III Expand opportunities to further engage families, community, businesses, and other local, state, and national organizations in the district arts education program. Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Goal IV Create a robust curriculum delivery system inclusive of aligned instructional goals and well-defined assessment protocols for students and arts educators. Data-Driven Decision-Making Goal V Provide an environment in which and tools whereby arts educators are comfortable utilizing data to make informed decisions regarding student learning in the arts.

Improving Internal Communication
Canvas Newsletters Podcasts Digital Learning Office Hours?

Professional Development for Arts Educators (PDAE) Grant
Online Modules Face-to-Face Summer Instruction with Collaboration Peer and Administrative Evaluation Data Collection and Analysis Arts Integration

Marketing Expansion Developing Our Presence
Social and Traditional Media Website Development Influential Minds Branding Partnerships Arts Booster Council Fundraising

State of the Arts Survey

Data-Driven Decision-Making: GCS State of the Arts 2018 Survey
Participants Level Percent Elementary 50.2 Middle 24.2 High 25.6 Total 215

Content Content Percent Art 37.7 Music 28.8 Band 12.6 Orchestra 3.7 Chorus 6.5 Theatre Arts 5.1 Dance 5.6

Degree Degree Percent Bachelor’s 63.7 Master’s 34.9 Doctoral 1.4

NBPTS NBPTS Percent No 86.0 Yes 14.0

Licensure Lateral-Entry? Percent No 76.7 Yes 23.3

Experience Years of Experience Percent 0-5 22.3 6-10 24.2 11-15 19.5 16-20 14.0 21-25 10.2 26-30 3.3 30+ 6.5

Budget Sources % Allocation Percent Funded School PTA Booster Fundraising Donation Partner 0-25 54.4 84.7 86.0 68.4 71.6 89.8 26-50 9.8 5.1 6.0 8.8 14.9 4.7 51-75 11.2 4.2 3.3 5.6 2.3 76-100 24.7 16.7 7.9

Fundraised Amount Per Year $ Percent I Do Not Fundraise 54.4 1-500 15.3 501-1,000 7.4 1,001-2,000 8.4 2,001-3,000 6.5 3,001-5,000 3.7 5,001-7,000 1.9 7,001-10,000 0.5 15,001-20,000 0.9 30,001-40,000 100,000+

How Much $ is Needed to Attain Your Vision $ Percent I Need No Extra Funds 4.7 1-1,000 17.7 1,001-5,000 30.7 5,001-10,000 22.8 10,001-15,000 7.4 15,001-20,000 4.2 20,001-30,000 2.3 30,001-40,000 0.9 40,001-50,000 1.9 50,001-75,000 75, ,000 1.4 100, ,000 250, ,000 0.5 500,000-1,000,000 1,000,000+

Rate Classroom Facilities Mean = 3.24 SD = 1.093 Rating Percent 1 (Worst) 5.6 2 21.4 3 28.4 4 32.6 5 (Best) 12.1

Rate Access to Supplies Mean = 3.18 SD = 1.146 Rating Percent 1 (Worst) 9.8 2 17.7 3 28.8 4 32.6 5 (Best) 11.2

Rate Auditorium Median = 2 Rating Percent 47.0 1 (Worst) 8.4 2 17.2 3 13.5 4 9.8 5 (Best) 4.2

Planning Time Mean = 4.40 Minutes Percent Less than 20 3.7 20-30 7.0 31-40 16.3 41-50 19.5 51-60 25.6 More than 1 hour 27.9

Lunch Time Mean = 2.26 Minutes Percent Less than 20 10.2 20-30 67.4 31-40 11.6 41-50 8.4 51-60 1.4 More than 1 hour 0.9

Importance of Arts Integration Mean = 2.18 Rating Percent Not at all important 3.1 Somewhat important 14.0 Very important 44.6 Extremely important 38.3

I Integrate the Arts in My Classroom Median = 2 Rating Percent Never 5.1 Once a month 25.1 Once a week 27.4 Every class 34.9 I don’t know 7.4

My School Integrates the Arts Median = 2 Rating Percent Never 5.1 Rarely 32.6 Sometimes 40.5 Often 9.8 I don’t know 12.1

Is Arts Included in Your SIP? Median = No Answer Percent No 62.3 Yes 7.9 I don’t know 29.8

Is There an Arts Rep on the SIT Median = Yes Answer Percent No 27.4 Yes 63.7 I don’t know 8.8

How Often Do You Attend PD? Median = Often Answer Percent Never 1.4 Rarely 6.0 Sometimes 27.9 Often 64.2 I don’t know 0.5

# of Professional Memberships Mean = 0.96 Number Percent 33.5 1 46.0 2 13.5 3 5.1 4 1.9

Attend State PD in the Past Two Years Answer Percent No 59.1 Yes 40.9

Attend District PD Answer Percent No 20.5 Yes 78.6 I don’t know 0.9

How Would You Spend an Extra $10,000? Capital, Instructional Supplies, Technology, Field Trips, Graduate Courses, Guests, Professional Development Rating Percent Instruct. Supply Capital Guests PD Field Trips Grad. Courses Tech 1 27.4 42.3 2.8 2.3 9.3 4.2 11.6 2 20.5 25.1 12.6 7.0 7.9 3.7 23.3 3 14.9 10.2 24.7 8.8 17.2 4 6.0 20.0 22.3 25.6 5 10.7 6.5 24.2 19.1 12.1 6 3.3 13.5 27.9 16.3 7 7.4 63.7

Rate Funding Median = 2 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 5.1 Very Inadequate 34.9 Somewhat Inadequate 25.1 Somewhat Adequate Very Adequate 9.8

Rate Facilities Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 0.9 Very Inadequate 13.0 Somewhat Inadequate 23.3 Somewhat Adequate 40.0 Very Adequate 22.8

Rate Available Supplies Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 0.9 Very Inadequate 16.3 Somewhat Inadequate 26.5 Somewhat Adequate 38.6 Very Adequate 17.7

Rate Condition of Supplies Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 0.9 Very Inadequate 15.3 Somewhat Inadequate 28.4 Somewhat Adequate 44.7 Very Adequate 11.6

Rate Instructional Time Median = 3 (Mean = 3.13) Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 1.9 Very Inadequate 5.1 Somewhat Inadequate 12.1 Somewhat Adequate 40.5 Very Adequate

Rate Available Technology Median = 2 (Mean = 2.3) Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 0.9 Very Inadequate 24.7 Somewhat Inadequate 33.0 Somewhat Adequate 26.5 Very Adequate 14.9

Rate Planning Time Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 2.3 Very Inadequate 8.4 Somewhat Inadequate 19.5 Somewhat Adequate 34.9 Very Adequate

Rate Collaboration Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 1.4 Very Inadequate 20.0 Somewhat Inadequate 24.2 Somewhat Adequate 39.1 Very Adequate 15.3

Rate Motivation of Students Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 0.9 Very Inadequate 6.0 Somewhat Inadequate 24.2 Somewhat Adequate 34.4 Very Adequate

Rate Parent Support Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 1.9 Very Inadequate 12.1 Somewhat Inadequate 20.0 Somewhat Adequate 40.9 Very Adequate 25.1

Rate Administrator Support Median = 3 Answer Percent Not applicable / I don’t know 2.3 Very Inadequate 6.0 Somewhat Inadequate 16.7 Somewhat Adequate 37.7 Very Adequate 37.2

GCS vs. NC Arts Support Mean = 3.52 Stars Percent 1 2.3 2 11.2 3 40.5 4 31.2 5 17.2

GCS vs. US Arts Support Mean = 3.13 Stars Percent 1 7.0 2 20.0 3 35.8 4 27.4 5 9.8

Class Sizes Grade Band Mean K-3 21.34 4-5 26.32

Correlations Level + Rate Classroom Facilities r = -.271 Level + Rate Access to Supplies Level + Rate Auditorium r = .293 Level + Planning Time r = .471 Level + Spend Capital r = -.236 Level + Spend PD r = .237 Level + Rate Facilities r = -.256 Level + Rate Available Supplies r = -.278 Level + Rate Condition of Supplies r = -.359 Level + Available Tech r = -.234 Level + Rate GCS v. NC / GCS v. US r = / -.273

Correlations SOC Status + FRL r = -.723 SOC Status + Composite Test r = .674 SOC Status + NCTWCS r = .491 SOC Status + Teacher Growth Ratings r = .324 SOC Status + Teacher Attrition r = -.318 SOC Status + Arts Teacher NBPTS SOC Status, PTA, and Fundraising r = .248; .269 SOC Status + Parent Support r = -.281 SOC Status + Community Support r = -.319

Correlations Composite Test + Arts NBPTS r = .277 Composite Test + Every Outside Fundraising Metric r = +PTA; Booster; Fundraising; and amount needed each year / - donation and partnerships Composite Test + Access, Availability, Condition of Supplies r = .239; .224; .219 Composite Test + Parent, Community Support r = .383; .372

Correlations NCTWCS + Arts NBPTS r = .235 NCTWCS + Access, Availability, Condition of Supplies r = .315; .252; .208 NCTWCS + Parent, Community Support r = .261; .276

Correlations EEG Status + Fundraised Amount Per Year r = .254 Teacher Attrition + Lunch Time r = -.208 Teacher Attrition + Parent, Community Support r = -.231; -.245 Content + Funds: School Source, Booster, Fundraising, Fundraised Amount PY, Funds Needed to Equalize r = -.208, .260, .251, .269, .331 Content + Professional Memberships, Two Year PD Attendance r = .254, .306 Content + Spend on Instructional Supplies r = .392 Content + Administrator Support

Correlations Licensure + Partnership r = -.305 School Source Budget + Fundraising r = -.429 School Source Budget + Two Year State PD Attendance r = -.231 Fundraiser Amount Needed PY + Booster Source Funds r = .526 Fundraiser Amount Needed PY + Equalizing Funds r = .429 Equalizing Funds Needed + Rate Condition of Supplies r = -.330 Equalizing Funds Needed + GCS v. US r = -.224

Correlations Rate Classroom Facilities + Spend $ on Capital, Spend $ on Guests r = .206; -.254 School Source Budget + Fundraising r = -.429 Rate Classroom Facilities + Rate Funding, Rate Facilities, Rate Available Supplies, Rate Condition of Supplies, Rate Available Tech r = .282, .644, .383, .442, .202 Rate Classroom Facilities, Rate Access to Supplies + GCS v. NC, GCS v. US r = .353, .359 Rate Access to Supplies + NCTWCS r = .315 Rate Access to Supplies + Rate Classroom Facilities r = .574 K-3 Class Size + Planning Time, Class Size 4-5 r = -.347, .402

Correlations K-3 Class Size + Rate Motivated Students r = -.275 K-3 Class Size + GCS v. NC Support, GCS v. US Support r = -.228, -.229 Planning Time + Spend $ on Capital r = -.232 Importance of Arts Integration + Self-Integration of Arts r = .194 Frequency of PD Attendance + Rate Motivated Students r = .220 Frequency of PD Attendance + GCS v. NC Support GCS v. NC Support + Rate Administrator Support, Rate Community Support r = .267, .277 GCS v. US Support + Rate Administrator Support, Community Support r = .245, .263

What Can We Learn From This Data?

Where Are We Going?

District Awards and Grants
Annual Report Annual Report 2018 Programming (i.e., SAI) Student Work Teacher Work District Awards and Grants Arts Master Plan 2022 Data Analysis

Staging for Future Grants and Awards
AEMDD Individual School Grant Applications Award Narratives Advocacy and Marketing National Leadership in Arts Education

Questions

Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Nathan Street, Ed.D. Director of Fine Arts January 31, 2018"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback