Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Objectives Solve one more example related to the psychometrics in AHU and building systems Learn about the psychometrics related to the cooling towers.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Objectives Solve one more example related to the psychometrics in AHU and building systems Learn about the psychometrics related to the cooling towers."— Presentation transcript:

1 Objectives Solve one more example related to the psychometrics in AHU and building systems Learn about the psychometrics related to the cooling towers Analize cooling cycles

2 2

3 Summary of HVAC Systems
Show HVAC processes on a psychrometric chart Draw condition lines Define sensible heat ratio Draw HVAC processes for real buildings Single zone Multiple zone

4 Cooling towes Similarity and difference between
Evaporative coolers and Cooing towers

5 Cooling Tower Similar to an evaporative cooler, but the purpose is often to cool water Widely used for heat rejection in HVAC systems Also used to reject industrial process heat

6 Air Washer Sprays liquid water into air stream
Typically, air leaves system at lower temperature and higher humidity than it enters

7 Schematic

8

9 Cooling Tower

10

11 Solution Can get from Stevens diagram (page 272)
Can also be used to determine Minimum water temperature Volume of tower required

12 Real World Concerns We need to know mass transfer coefficients
They are not typically known for a specific direct-contact device Vary widely depending on packing material, tower design, mass flow rates of water and air, etc. In reality, experiments are typically done for a particular application

13 Summary Heat rejection is often accomplished with devices that have direct contact between air and water Evaporative cooling Can construct analysis of these devices Requires parameters which need to be measured for a specific system

14 Reading assignments related to the HVAC systems Chapters 7 & 8 and Handout Section on the course website

15 Vapor Compression Cycle
Expansion Valve

16

17 Efficiency First Law Second law Coefficient of performance, COP
COP = useful refrigerating effect/net energy supplied COP = qr/wnet Second law Refrigerating efficiency, ηR ηR = COP/COPrev Comparison to ideal reversible cycle

18 Carnot Cycle No cycle can have a higher COP
All reversible cycles operating at the same temperatures (T0, TR) will have the same COP For constant temp processes dq = Tds COP = TR/(T0 – TR)

19 Real Cycles Assume no heat transfer or potential or kinetic energy transfer in expansion valve COP = (h3-h2)/(h4-h3) Compressor displacement = mv3

20 Example R-22 condensing temp of 30 °C (86F) and evaporating temp of 0°C (32 F) Determine qcarnot wcarnot Diminished qR and excess w for real cycle caused by throttling and superheat horn ηR

21

22 Comparison Between Single-Stage and Carnot Cycles
Figure 3.6

23 Subcooling and Superheating
Refrigerant may be subcooled in condenser or in liquid line Temperature goes below saturation temperature Refrigerant may be superheated in evaporator or in vapor (suction) line Temperature goes above saturation temperature

24 Two stage systems

25 Multistage Compression Cycles
Combine multiple cycles to improve efficiency Prevents excessive compressor discharge temperature Allows low evaporating temperatures (cryogenics)


Download ppt "Objectives Solve one more example related to the psychometrics in AHU and building systems Learn about the psychometrics related to the cooling towers."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google