1. SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning
Captain John T. Dye Jr.

2. Ready Relevant Learning
Nature of Brief
Informational/Decisional
Ready, Relevant Learning Initiative
Issue Summary
Develop Block Learning for 77 Ratings and conduct analysis for 6 pilot ratings to support FY17 Content Re-engineering
Effectively manage contract funding in support of Ready Relevant Learning
Context /Assumptions
Block Training will utilize existing curriculum, and current training delivery methods and locations
Fleet SMEs and Learning Center resources will be available to perform required analysis and validate Block Learning recommendations
Contract centrally managed by NETC N7 with dedicated support from NETC N-Codes and Learning Centers
NETC N5, N7, LCs, NAVMAC, and the Fleet must partner for Block Learning to succeed
Partner with NETC N6 to identify Information Technology required to support Block Learning & the Learning Continuums
Way Ahead
Learning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block Learning
Contract Award (SEP 2015)
Team Composition
Team Training
Block Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)
Validate with Requirement Sponsor
Modify Courses to Re-Phase Training
Update Schedules
Perform Assessments, and Adjust Training as Required
Build Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master)
For Centers, this brief is informational. When it is briefed to N7/CNETC it should be decisional.
Bottom line up front: Prototype has been tested by our internal team and the process works to block training for 77 rates and will follow a POA&M that should have all 77 ratings completed by JULY 2016. 2

3. Definitions RRL BLOCK LEARNING (Interim Step to RRL)
The reorganization of current “As Is” training and delivery methods into blocks to be delivered closer to the time of actual use in the performance of duties. Redistribute accession level training courses across the Delayed Entry Program, initial service schools, and first two operational tours.
RRL/LEARNING CONTINUUM
A learning model that combines self-development, institutional training and operational experience that begins when a Sailor enters the Navy and ends when they retire. The model should provide more relevant, tailored, and engaging learning experiences through a career long continuum of learning that is not location-dependent, but accessed at the point of need. Right Training, Right Time, Right Place. 3

4. RRL
CNO Directed, Joint Initiative with USFF, CPF, NETC, CNPC, CNRC, OPNAV Resource Sponsors, TYCOM Reps, Program Offices, SYSCOMs, and NAWCTSD
Initially, Only Applies to NETC Training, 77 Ratings
Analysis Based upon a Standardized, Repeatable, and Defendable Process to Determine “Right Training, Right Time, Right Place”
NETC E2E Process
Using AIM CPM (JDTA, to define the work) and LO Module
Goal is to Achieve a Reduction in “Brick and Mortar” Training for 30% “A” School and 70% “C” School Accession Training
Maximize Re-Use, Re-Purpose, and Reference (R3), “Eliminate Redundancy”
Mobile Modularized Learning
Leverage Innovative Training Delivery Technologies
Proposal to assign CCA and CCMM for Common Core Modules (e.g. Basic Electricity, Pumps, Switchboards, Radar Fundamentals, etc...)
- Assign CCA and CCMM for Common Core Modules:
“NOT WITHOUT PRECEDENCE”
Today:
3M – CSS
CNO Directed “SONAR Training” be aligned to SLC (includes sonar for surface, air, and sub-surface communities) 4

5. RRL Content Re-Engineering Phasing Matrix
Crafted by OPNAV N1.
Based upon availability of funding through Analysis is underway to identify an optimal phasing plan that will be focused on rating commonality that will fit the financial model associated with RRL.
Learning Center: Ratings:
CID CTM, IS, CTT, CTR, CTN, IT, CTI
CNATT AE, AM, ATI, ATO, AME, AG, AZ, ABE, ABF, ABH, AC, AO, AS, AD, AW(F, O, R, S, V), PR
CSCS STG, BM, OS, FC, GM, IC, FC(A), MN, ET
CSF MA,
CSFE SW, EA, BU, CE, CM, UT, EO
CSS LS, PS, SH, CS, LN, YN, NC-C, NC-R, MC, MU
EODD ND, EOD
NCSC RP
SLC STS, ET (NAV), MM-W, FT, CSS, LSS, MT, YNS, ITS, MM-A, ET(COM)
SEAL/SWCC
SWOS QM, EN, DC, HT, GSE, GSM, MR, EM, MM 5

6. Block Learning Project Workforce
Project Workforce (Government)
NETC
Project Management Team
Project Management (TPOC / ATPOC / 4 Project Leads (QA) (6 member team)
Rating Analysis Teams
Program Analysts (Team Leads for ten project teams) (10 Analysts)
Learning Centers
Center Project Lead, Instructional Systems Designer and Rating Lead (3 Analysts)
Rating Phasing will determine total commitment at any time
Fleet
3 to 5 Fleet Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
Project Workforce (Vendor)
Management Team (1 Project Manager / 1 ISD Lead)
10 Analysis Teams
Instructional Systems Specialists (2), Database Management and input (4)
This represents the original construct for team composition. Once the contract is let, the contractor will come to the table with their recommendations which may alter the current plan.
Provide description of the “process” to Block Learning, to include the Learning Center’s role in Block Learning. 6

7. Create Repository Collaborative Work Environment (CWE)
Centrally Manages Content. Stores Source and Working Files
Allows Learning Center, NETC, and Fleet Requirement Sponsor(s) and SME’s to Review and Discuss Material, and Analyze Results Online
Repose Comments and Actions Taken, and Maintain Schedules and Timeline
Recommended solution is Blackboard, SharePoint to be utilized initially until ATO issues are resolved
Content Planning Module (CPM) - Clean Database
To Establish and Create the Foundation for Future NETC Training Requirements
Business Rules, Style Guide and a Properly Structured Database to Achieve Sailor 2025 Requirements is Critical
NETPDTC has Created a New AIM CPM Data Base for Sailor 2025
It is important to note that most of the work will be performed in a virtual collaborative environment. Ultimately all work associated with the 77 ratings will be uploaded into AIM CPM. 7

8. Identify Ratings & Courses
Learning Center
Number of Ratings
Number of Rating Paths
Number of Unique CINs
CID 7
CNATT 20
CSCS 9
CSF 1
CSFE
CSS 10
EODD 2
NCSC
SLC 11
SEAL/SWCC
SWOS
Totals: 77
This is a snapshot of all ratings by Centers, the number of Rating Paths which N71 has coordinated with OPNAV and the numbers of courses that will have to be reviewed broken down by Centers.
Learning Center: Ratings:
CID CTM, IS, CTT, CTR, CTN, IT, CTI
CNATT AE, AM, ATI, ATO, AME, AG, AZ, ABE, ABF, ABH, AC, AO, AS, AD, AW(F, O, R, S, V), PR
CSCS STG, BM, OS, FC, GM, IC, FC(A), MN, ET
CSF MA,
CSFE SW, EA, BU, CE, CM, UT, EO
CSS LS, PS, SH, CS, LN, YN, NC-C, NC-R, MC, MU
EODD ND, EOD
NCSC RP
SLC STS, ET (NAV), MM-W, FT, CSS, LSS, MT, YNS, ITS, MM-A, ET(COM)
SEAL/SWCC
SWOS QM, EN, DC, HT, GSE, GSM, MR, EM, MM
Need to Identify Courses that have issues. (i.e. ITRO, Executive Agent, FMS) 8

9. Identify Metrics Example of a Metrics Chart Cognos can Provide
Partner with N5 to Create Metrics
Metrics to Track Progress of Block Learning for each Rating
NAE/N98 CNATT:
AIRC-AWO
AIRR-AWS
AIRC-AWV
AV-AT-I
AV-AE
AV-AT-O
AIRC-AWF
AN PACT PR AD AZ AC AG AO
AIRR-AWR AM
AME AS
ABE
ABF
ABH
SWE/N96 SWOS: EM
GSM MM EN DC MR
FN PACT
GSE HT QM
SWE/N96 CSCS: FC IC GM OS ET BM
STG
NIDE/N2/N6 CID:
CTI- Korean
 CTI- Chinese
 CTI- Hebrew
 CTI- Persian
 CTI- Arabic
 CTI- Russian
 CTI- Spanish
CTM
CTN
CTR IS IT
CTT
N7 will partner with N5 to build the metrics that we will utilize to track Block Learning progress by rating and perhaps by each course associated with a rating. This slide will provide the overview and the previous slide will track each step in the process to determine which are on track and which may need additional attention to get back and stay on track.
Example of a Metrics Chart Cognos can Provide 9

10. Gather Data Learning Center NETC N7 NAVMAC Acquisition
Training Course Control Document (TCCD), with Annexes
Formal Course Reviews
Instructor Guide, Trainee Guide and Presentation Material
Testing Plan and Assessments
NETC N7
CETARS CMS and Course Description
List of COI’s Necessary for Sailor 2025 Block / Analysis
NAVMAC
Approved Occupational Standards (OCCSTDs)
Acquisition
Navy Training Systems Plan (NTSP)
This slide identifies the documents that we will utilize to conduct the analysis and block training. All documents will be maintained in a collaborative work environment that will provide common access to materials in use. 10

11. JDTA Process Modified to Meet Timeline
Conduct Analysis
Analysis Documents
Training Situation Document (TSD)
Documents the “As-Is” State of the Courses of Instruction
Provides Data to Recommend “Block Learning”
Instructional Performance Requirements Document (IPRD)
Documents the Work Requirements and Puts Them into Context
Provides Data that Recommends When the Content Should be Trained
Creates the JDTA for Review
Instructional Media Requirements Document (IMRD)
Identifies Media Requirements, Supports “Rounding the COI Edges Between “Blocks of Learning”
Job, Duty, Task Analysis (JDTA) Data
Approved Work Requirements in Context in AIM CPM
New slide under development for the analysis process.
JDTA Process Modified to Meet Timeline 11

12. USFF Proposed Governance RRL
Decisional
FCRC
4 Star
The FCRC will make final judgment on the RRL pilot and determine if RRL is applied to other rates
R3B and FCRC will provide strategic oversight and make determinations where RRL changes will impact Readiness
RRL ESC is the Flag/SES decisional body for the tactical and operational levels; all Design WGs and Rating Review WGs will brief the ESC
RRL ESC Action Team aggregates information coming out of the ESC for presentation to the R3B and the FCRC
R3B
Integration Working Group
Coordinates RRL impact across all Navy and DoD systems and processes (e.g. DRRS, CeTARS, FLTMPS, NTSP, 3M, ITRO, etc.)
Identify resources required to update systems and processes to ensure compatibility with RRL
Integration of RRL to external Navy processes
RRL ESC
1-2 Star
RRL ESC
Action Team
O-6 Level
Design
Execution
Resourcing
RRL-Wide Planning Groups
RRL Rating Review
Working Groups
Navy Capability Board (NCB)
Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition
O-6 Level
One WG per rate
OPNAV N80/N10
Resource Sponsors
USFF/CPF
Distribution
DEP
Assessments
IT Backbone
Conducts pilot programs for each rate prior to full implementation of block learning phase for that rate
Responsible for assessing impacts to readiness
Determines resources required at each phase of RRL
Works within individual warfare area process to provide solutions for their aligned rates
Slides 12 & 13 are designed to impress upon everyone the necessity to stay on track and on timeline. Our work, and subsequent recommendations, must be made in timely fashion in order to support whatever approval process is ultimately put into place.
Design solution options for each functional area that will be applied to all RRL rates
Provide direct liaison with individual Rating Review WGs
RRL Rating Review
Working Groups
Lines of Effort
Foundational
Block Learning
Mobile Modularized Learning
O-6 Level
One WG per rate
Owns RRL for each specific rate
Manages the rate through the RRL process
Content Reengineering
Assessments 12

13. USFF Proposed Decisional RRL
Members
Responsibilities
FCRC
Per COMPACFLT / COMUSFLTFORCOMINST A
CPF and CUFFC co-chair the FCRC
FCRC provides strategic oversight of RRL and makes decisions on recommendations forwarded and vetted by the R3B
Supported TYCOM represents the integrated voice of their warfare community to the FCRC for RRL
R3B
RRL ESC
1-2 Star
USFF *
CPF
CNETC *
CNPC
OPNAV Resource Sponsors
TYCOM Reps
Flag / SES decisional body for RRL operational and tactical-level issues
All Design Planning Groups and Rating Review Working Groups will brief the ESC
Informs R3B/FCRC of decisions made
Forwards the following to R3B/FCRC for final decision:
Concurrence to shift each rating to Block Learning
Concurrence to secure legacy training for each rating
RRL ESC
Action Team
O-6 Level
Here are the major players and their responsibilities.
NETC *
USFF *
CPF
TYCOM
Filters briefs coming up from the Design and Rating Review Working Groups prior to delivery to the ESC
Aggregates information and decisions coming out of the ESC for follow-on presentation to the R3B and FCRC
Maintains RRL Battle Rhythm
Provides status to NCB as requested (quarterly/semiannually)
Serves as conduit between various working/planning groups
Direct the development of a charter and approve for each Planning Working Group
OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.)
* Co-Chair 13

14. Challenges Block Learning
NETC/Navy Does Own All Training Courses:
DoD Executive Agent
ITRO
SCETP
Other Services
Implementation of Block Learning to Commence in FY17
Future Delivery Issues
Block Learning May Result in Multiple CINs and CDPs
Security Clearances
Success of Block Learning and RRL will be used in discussions with other Services, Agencies, and Foreign Services to determine if they want to shift to the RRL Model.
DoD Executive Agent:
Training provided to two or more Services by a Service or agency under the authority of OASD
Participation is mandatory
EA may use ITRO processes
Example: Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)
Navy (NETC) EA
With oversight from the Technical Training Acceptance Board (TTAB) and EOD Program Board
ITRO: Interservice Training Review Organization - Two or more military Services mutually agreeing to train together on individual skills in an institutional setting
Types of ITRO Training:
Consolidated Training
A course consisting of a curriculum developed by two or more Services
The course faculty includes fair-share instructor representation from all participating Services and the host Service
Training policies, directives, materials and personnel requirements are determined by mutual agreement of the Services involved
Collocated Training
A course taught by one Service on another Service’s installation in which classroom facilities and equipment may be shared
Training policies, curriculum and instructor requirements are the responsibility of the Service conducting the training
SCETP: Security Cooperation Education and Training Programs. The Naval Education and Training Security Assistance Field Activity (NETSAFA) manages the Navy’s international education and training under SCETP. Education and training courses offered through SCETP include: Professional Military Education, technical, maintenance, operational, and personnel development.
Major activities under SCETP include:
Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
Foreign Military Financing (FMF)
U.S. Grant programs:
International Military Education and Training (IMET)
Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP)
Counter Narcotics (CN)
Other Services: Training provided by other services that Navy students attend, that is not associated with ITRO. 14

15. Way-Ahead
Learning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block Learning
Initial Contract Award (SEP 2015)
Team Composition
Team Training
Block Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)
Validate with Requirement Sponsor
Modify Courses to Re-Phase Training
Update Schedules
Perform Assessments, and Adjust Training as Required
Build Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master) 15

16. QUESTIONS 16

17. BACK-UPS 17

18. Validation Multiple Tiers of Validation
Team Lead with Members
QA Team (N72 and LC) with Team
Management Team with Multiple Teams
Requirement Sponsor, Rating Lead, and
Fleet SME’s with Teams
Data Completed and Approved on Spreadsheet Before being
Entered into AIM CPM
Data Added to Master IPRD Task List; Redundant Items Identified
Construct Allows Individual Items to be Added or Deleted
Validation will take place at different tiers throughout the project. Internally the Quality Assurance Team comprised of personnel in N72/74 and the Learning Centers will validate information prior to being uploaded in to CPM. A second form of validation will take place once the analysis in complete and that will be performed by the Resource/Requirements Sponsors prior to making changes to content. (Blocking the existing material.) 18

19. Phased Implementation Plan
FY 16
FY 17
FY 18
FY 19
FY 20
FY 21
Phasing Plan 77
Block Learning Build 77
Interim Block Learning 6
Pilot DEP Trng 6
Training in DEP 12
In Depth Analysis 6 6
Content Reengineering
Content Validation
Mobile, Modularized Learning 15 15
Pilot DEP Trng
Training in DEP 30 15 15
In Depth Analysis
Content Reengineering
Content Validation
Mobile, Modularized Learning 23 23
Pilot DEP Trng
Training in DEP 18
In Depth Analysis 23
Content Reengineering
Content Validation 23 23
Pilot DEP Trng
Training in DEP 17
Feedback required by rating & stage to ensure quality maintained
Ratings transition from Block Learning to mobile, modularized learning as it is delivered
In Depth Analysis 23
Content Reengineering 10
Pilot DEP Trng 10
Trng in DEP
Metered approach 10
Content Reengineering 19

20. USFF Proposed Planning Groups RRL
Members
Actions
Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition (TDR&A)
NETC *
OPNAV
Other Training Agents
SYSCOMs (as applicable)
NAWC TSD
Learning Centers
USFF / CPF
TYCOMs
TRAINING DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS
Standardizes requirements and execution of learning
Provides oversight for all Planning / Working Groups in the design and execution of all RRL Lines of Effort
Ensures the design and execution for each Rating WG incorporates effective learning delivery technologies that apply adult learning theory and produce maximum learning transference
Develops and publishes guidance for planning, analysis, design development, implementation and evaluation (PADDIE) in support of RRL
Coordinates with IT Backbone PG to maintain Instructional Systems Design (ISD) standards and alignment of all training systems
ACQUISITION
Coordinates training technology acquisition to maximize shared and re-purposed curriculum content
Develops processes for operational systems acquisition (platform, system, subsystem, equipment) to ensure NTSP development and review process incorporates approved RRL concepts
Assessments
USFF *
SYSCOMs
NETC
Program Offices
Learning Centers
CNPC
OPNAV
All others with equity in Readiness
CPF
TYCOMs
Develops comprehensive MOPs and MOEs that provide qualitative and quantitative feedback for Navy Individual Training for all applicable aspects of Readiness (DOTMLPF) into the foreseeable future (extends beyond RRL)
Creates a single template for use by all Rating WGs to provide results to the RRL ESC
Once implemented for a rating, determines the effectiveness of Block Learning, including the effects on the fleet from mid-tour training and if the Block Learning model produces a better prepared Sailor
Develops and implements a means (dashboard product) to provide the overall impact of RRL on each pillar of DOTMLPF
NETC plays a role beginning in DEP through the establishment of the IT Backbone, coordination with the distribution system, assessments required, and ultimately training delivery.
Distribution
CNPC *
USFF */ CPF
OPNAV
TYCOMS
NETC
Produces a system capable of distributing and tracking Sailors throughout each rate’s career training continuum
Ensures RRL distribution is compatible with enlisted advancement processes
Ensures RRL distribution is compatible with Readiness reporting mechanisms (DRRS)
Integrates Billet-Based Detailing (BBD) into RRL design and execution
IT Backbone
NETC *
TYCOMS
OPNAV
Learning Centers
USFF / CPF
Supports delivery of IT tools supporting Block Learning, DEP training and learning continuum development
Develops mobile learning strategy to support mobile, modular learning for the Sailor of 2025
Facilitates requirements development for required RRL IT capabilities in FY17 and beyond
DEP
NETC *
USFF / CPF
OPNAV
Legal Rep
CNRC
Learning Centers
NETC
Produces a legal, measurable and repeatable DEP training template available for each RRL rating working group to use in their rate’s training continuum design
Monitors legislative changes required to authorize training in DEP
Liaises with Assessments WG to define MOPs and MOEs for training in DEP
* Planning Group Lead
OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.) 20

21. Identify Ratings & Courses Training Path Example
Pre A School
A School
Post A School
Five Accession Training Paths:
NEC 0000, NEC 2005 (Dog Handler), NEC 90CS (ECS), NEC 90CS + (CDP 09GP or 09XN)
Life Skills replaces NMT and PFM in FY16 F L E T
59 Days
2 Days
2 Days
75 Days
RTC
CDP 6387
NMT
CDP 982U
PFM
CDP 653F
MA A SCHOOL
CDP 1981
NEC 0000
77 Days
MILITARY WORKING DOG
HANDLER CDP 478N
NEC 2005
26 Days
EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT SKILLS
CDP 03PP
This is a sample training path the MAA rate. Each rating has it’s own unique set of paths that have been validated with the Centers and OPNAV.
26 Days
26 Days
EXPEDITIONARY
COMBAT SKILLS
CDP 03PP
CRF EMB SEC SKILLS
CDP 09GP
26 Days
26 Days
EXPEDITIONARY
COMBAT SKILLS
CDP 03PP
CRF EMB SEC SKILLS
CDP 09XN
 COASTAL RIVERINE FORCE
EMBARKED SECURITY COMBAT SKILLS (A ) taught by CORIVGRU 1 & 2 21 21