1. IPCRF for T1-3 WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D.
SANTA ANA FISHERY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D.
Santa ana, cagayan valley

2. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
Teaching-Learning Process
Prepare daily lesson logs of activities in learning areas handled including appropriate adequate and updated instructional materials
June-March
10%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1. DLLs have always SMART objectives, developing HOTS
2. Objectives are competency based under the K+12 curriculum
3. Parts of the DLLs have correct entries
4. With appropriate IMs
5. DLLS are 100% complete in subj. handled
6. Submitted on time
Very Satisfactory 4
With items no. 1 and 2 plus 3 other indicators specified above
Satisfactory 3
With items 1 and 2 but with instances of Non-SMART objectives and not developing HOTS plus 2 other indicators
Unsatisfactory 2
DLLs were not properly prepared; with missing parts and incomplete in the subjects handled
Poor 1
None of the given indicator was followed
Name
Name of Rater
Position
Teacher
Review Period
April 2016
Date of Review

3. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
Teaching-Learning Process
Facilitate learning through appropriate and innovative teaching strategies that develop HOTS
June-
March
20%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Learning activities provided were always in line with the objectives specified in the DLL
2. Utilized varied strategies and differentiated instruction always
3. Strategies used elicited 100% class interaction
4. All learning activities developed HOTS
5. ICT integration was evident
Very Satisfactory 4
With items 1,2,3 and 4 of the given indicators with no. 3 at 75% only
Satisfactory 3
With indicator 1 plus 2 other indicators
Unsatisfactory 2
Indicator no. 1 was not always observed but with another indicator followed
Poor 1
None of the indicators was followed

4. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
Teaching-Learning Process
Provide a safe, student-friendly and conducive learning environment for learners
June-
March
10%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Classroom is neat and clean, well-lighted, ventilated and with well-maintained facilities (chairs, tables and blackboard, windows and doors)
2. With functional drinking facilities
3. With cabinets for books and cleaning materials neatly arranged
4. Bulletin boards are structured with learners’ information profile and school rules and other required information
5. With available garbage receptacles; evident of proper waste segregation and disposal
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 but with 2-3 instances of non-compliance
Satisfactory 3
With any 3 of the 5 indicators
Unsatisfactory 2
With any 2 of the 5 indicators
Poor 1
With only 1 of the 5 indicators

5. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES
Monitor
and evaluate students’ learning outcomes
June-
March
15%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Class records reflect
> students’ assessed competencies
> date of assessment
> at least 10 recorded assessment
> remediation assessment conducted
2. Summative assessments reflect the three components that serve as bases for grading as indicated in the TOS
3. Utilization of test results is evident as shown in students’ portfolios in subjects handled
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1, 2, and 3 but no students’ portfolios
Satisfactory 3
With any 2 of the 3 indicators
Unsatisfactory 2
With any 2 of the 3 indicators but incomplete
Poor 1
With any 1 of the 3 indicators but incomplete

6. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES
Undertake activities to improve performance indicators
June-
March
15%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.100% of learners in the subjects handled have passed for the academic year
2. 100% of the learners handled have completed the school year
3. Taught 100% of the required competencies with 75% mastery level
4. Conducted remediation for slow and absentee learners
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1,2,3 but mastery level is not 75% but not lower than 50%
Satisfactory 3
With indicators 1,2, and 3 but not 100% but not lower than 75% for indicators 1 and/or 2
Unsatisfactory 2
With indicators 1,2and 3 but below 75% but not lower than 50%
Poor 1
Only 1 of the 4 indicators but below 50%

7. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES
Maintain updated students’ school records
June-
March
10%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.With complete profiles of students handled including anecdotal records of students with special needs
2. Released students’ grades (100%) every grading period in all subjects handled on or before the due date
3. Submitted SF 2 on time, data reflected in SF1
4. Submitted well accomplished forms of students like forms 138, 137, school clearance and other forms required by the office
5. With evidence of utilization of the students’ school records
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1,2,3 and 4 but with instances of not more than 2 delays
Satisfactory 3
With indicators 1and 2 plus another indicator either 3 or 4 or 5 with instances of not more than 5 delays
Unsatisfactory 2
With at least 1 of the indicators with instances of not more than 5 delays
Poor 1
With at least 1 indicator but incomplete and delayed more than 5 times

8. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Supervise curricular and co-curricular projects and activities
June-
March 5%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Adviser/ Coordinator of recognized school organization/club/program established in the school
2. Initiated activities/projects of the organization/ club handled as reflected in the action plan submitted with external funding and support
3. Accomplished activities/projects/programs within the scheduled date
4. Activities/projects contributed to the improvement of performance indicators
5. Supervision, training and activities were done as additional tasks apart from the regular loads handled
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1,2,3,4 and 5 but funding has been provided by the school
Satisfactory 3
With indicators 1,2,3,4 and 5 but without action plan submitted
Unsatisfactory 2
With indicator 1 plus any other indicator from 2,3,4,5
Poor 1
With indicator 1 only

9. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Support activities of governmental and non-governmental organizations
June-
March 5%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Officer of a GO, NGO or PO for the current rating
2. Participated in the implementation and completion of a GO,NGO or PO program, project or activities for the current year
3. Program, project, activities have positive impact to the welfare of the youth or the community
Very Satisfactory 4
Any 2 of the 3 indicators given
Satisfactory 3
Any 1 of the 3 indicators given
Unsatisfactory 2
Participant to any 3 government or non-government activities
Poor 1
Participant to less than 3 government or non-government activities

10. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
Per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Conduct action research in the area of concern/creative work/publication
June-
March 5%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Action research was in line with the subject area/concern of the researcher
2.Action research has been submitted at least to the school head for approval before implementation
3. Action research has been implemented with reported results within the rating period
4. Results has been utilized in the school
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 1,2 and 3
Satisfactory 3
With indicators 1,2 and 3 but results had been incomplete
Unsatisfactory 2
With indicators 1 and 2 but implementation is initial only
Poor 1
With indicator 1 only

11. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Participate in activities that enhance professional growth (seminar, teachers association)
June-
March 3%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Had finished at least 9 units in post graduate studies within the rating period
2. Had 100% attendance in all seminars required by the school
3. Had 100% attendance in school programs and activities
4. Manifested professionalism in dealing with colleagues, parents and members of the community
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicators 2, 3 and 4
Satisfactory 3
With indicators 2,3 and 4 but not 100% for indicators 2 and 3 but not less than 75%
Unsatisfactory 2
With indicators 2, 3 and 4 but less than 75 % in attendance to seminars and programs
Poor 1
Failure to observe indicator no. 4

12. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME
LINE
WEIGHT
Per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
Receive special awards/
citation/ recognition for exemplary performance
June-
March 2%
Outstanding 5
INDICATORS
1.Award/s received is for exemplary performance that had contributed to the improvement of performance indicators for the current rating period
2. Received at least 5 awards under the category of outstanding with supporting documents
Very Satisfactory 4
With indicator 1 but only 4 awards and only 1 or 2 under the category of outstanding
Satisfactory 3
With indicator 1 but only 3 awards and not in the outstanding category
Unsatisfactory 2
With indicator 1 only
Poor 1
Received award/s but did not contribute to the improvement of performance indicators
OVER-ALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS