Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire"— Presentation transcript:

1 RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire
Responses opened from Thursday November 2nd until Wednesday November 15, 2017

2 135 Total Responses Date Created: Sunday, October 29, 2017
Complete Responses: 135

3

4

5

6 Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay?
Answered: Skipped: 0

7 Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay?
Answered: Skipped: 0

8

9

10

11 Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)? Answered: Skipped: 1

12 Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)? Answered: Skipped: 1

13

14 Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide? Answered: Skipped: 4

15 Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide? Answered: Skipped: 4

16

17 Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers? Answered: Skipped: 4

18 Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers? Answered: Skipped: 4

19 Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline? Answered: Skipped: 1

20 Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline? Answered: Skipped: 1

21 Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed? Answered: Skipped: 1

22 Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed? Answered: Skipped: 1

23 No Question Posed

24 RCPNA Board Meeting Tues. November 7th
Unanimously approved the recommendation: “Request a 6-month Extension to the Nov. 30th, 2017, comment deadline for the City of Portland RIP Discussion Draft”

25

26

27

28 City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS)
BPS recently extended the deadline for public comments to the RIP Discussion Draft to 5:00 pm on Thursday November 30, 2017, See: RCPNA LU & TC has the authority by Charter to render a decision on behalf of RCPNA when the item in question is time sensitive and does not allow the Board the opportunity to review the proposal. This is the case with the RIP Discussion Draft. LU & TC Possible Actions Include: Forwarding the RCPNA Board recommended 6-mo extension, only; Recommending approval of the Oct. 19th Tentative Recommendations (possibly amended) together with the 6-month extension request; Bullet #2 with questionnaire summary. No Action

29 Thank You for Your Participation
Tamara DeRidder, AICP Principal, TDR & Associates


Download ppt "RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google